Gender bias and sexual discrimination (GBSD) have been widely recognized across a range of fields and are now part of the wider social consciousness. Such conduct can occur in the medical workplace, with detrimental effects on recipients. The aim of this review was to identify the prevalence and impact of GBSD in orthopaedic surgery, and to investigate interventions countering such behaviours. A systematic review was conducted by searching Medline, EMCARE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library Database in April 2020, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to which we adhered. Original research papers pertaining to the prevalence and impact of GBSD, or mitigating strategies, within orthopaedics were included for review.Aims
Methods
Accurate measurement of the glenoid version is important in performing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our aim was to evaluate the Ellipse method, which involves formally defining the vertical mid-point of the glenoid prior to measuring the glenoid version and comparing it with the ‘classic’ Friedman method. This was a retrospective study which evaluated 100 CT scans for patients who underwent a primary TSA. The glenoid version was measured using the Friedman and Ellipse methods by two senior observers. Statistical analyses were performed using the paired Aims
Methods
The concept of a predetermined first patient on the following days trauma list (the golden patient) was introduced to our hospital in April 2009. The golden patient (GP) should already have been seen by an anaesthetist and be ready to be sent for by theatres early. The aim was to improve theatre start times following disappointing results from a previous in-hospital study. It has been shown by others to improve operation start times and could be used to improve trauma services and meet clinical targets more readily. This prospective study involved the collection of planned trauma lists with the designated GP over November and December 2009. Data was collected from theatre logbooks and included patient demographics, theatre arrival, anaesthetic and operation start times. This was compared with the pre-GP data (January and February 2009). A two sample T-test was used to evaluate statistical significance between groups.Introduction
Methods
Ankle fractures account for 10% of all fractures. Most deformed looking ankles are manipulated in the emergency departments (ED) on clinical judgement in order to improve the outcome and avoid skin complications. It is accepted that significantly displaced ankle injuries with neurovascular (NV) compromise or critical skin should be reduced prior to imaging. However, is it really possible to understand the injury to an ankle without an x-ray or other imaging? The other possible injuries around the ankle, presenting with swelling and deformity of the ankle region, may include a ligamentous, talar, subtalar, Chopart joint or calcaneal injury. Does the risk of waiting for the imaging outweigh the benefit of manipulation of an undiagnosed injury? This prospective study involved the analysis of all patients with ankle injuries referred to orthopaedics between November 2009 and February 2010. Results: Over the audited period 100 referrals were identified (43 male, 57 female). The average age was 50.4 years (range 5–89). Only 2% of fractures were open. Manipulation in the ED was performed for 44% of patients. Of these, 39% (17 cases) were manipulated and supported in plaster slab without an initial x-ray; 3 due to vascular deficit, 2 due to critical skin and 12 with no documented reason! Re-manipulation in the ED as well as definitive open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were significantly lower in those patients who had an x-ray prior to manipulation (p < 0.05). ORIF was performed in 68% of all patients. Importantly, 80% of ankles manipulated in ED went on to have ORIF which was significantly higher than the 47% in the non-manipulation cohort (p < 0.05). We conclude that taking ankle injury radiographs prior to any attempt at manipulation, in the absence of NV deficit or critical skin, will constitute best practice.
The concept of the golden patient (GP) was introduced to our busy teaching district general hospital, in April 2009, to improve trauma theatre start times following disappointing results from a previous in-hospital study. The GP is a pre-selected first patient on the following day trauma list who is medically fit with a clear surgical plan. The GP should have already been seen by an anaesthetist and be ready to be sent for by theatres early. It has been shown by others to improve operation start times and could be used to improve trauma services and meet clinical targets more readily. This prospective study involved the collection of planned trauma lists with the designated GP over November and December 2009. Data was collected from the theatre logbooks, including patient demographics, theatre reception, anaesthetic and operation start times. This was compared with the pre-GP data (January and February 2009). Graphs showing the comparative mean start times between pre-GP and GP trauma lists, including the 95% confidence interval for the population mean were created. A two sample T test was used to evaluate significance between groups.Introduction
Methods
Sterile Surgical Helmet System (SSHS) are used routinely in hip and knee arthroplasty in order to decrease the risk of infection. It protects surgeon from splash and also prevents contamination of surgical field from reverse splash by virtue of its perceived sterility. A prospective study was conducted to confirm if SSHS remain sterile throughout the procedure in Hip (THA) and Knee (TKA) Arthroplasty. We also evaluated if type of theatre had any effect on degree of contamination. Visor area of 40 SSHS was swabbed at half hourly interval until the end of the procedure. Two groups of 20 each were made on the basis of theatre used for performing surgery. Group 1 (Gp1) had surgery performed in laminar flow and Group 2 (Gp2) in non-laminar flow theatre. Swabs collected were processed to compare the time dependent contamination of the SSHS and identify the organisms responsible for contamination.Background
Material and Methods
Current evidence on the indications for and efficacy of non-rigid lumbar stabilisation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to review the outcome of the DYNESYS system (Zimmer, Inc.) in a consecutive series of 34 patients undergoing this procedure between 2001 and 2006. Prospectively collected outcome measure data obtained pre-operatively and at 1 year post-operatively was analysed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed using revision surgery as the end point. Cox Regression was utilised to identify variables that were related to implant survival. Pain rating on the visual analogue scale improved from a mean of 7 pre-op to 4 at 1 year (p=0.009), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores from 13 to 9 (p=0.02), Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire from 13 to 9 (p=0.03). When reporting subjective outcome, 54% of patients reported “better” or “much better” outcomes at last followup (12–69 months post op). Eight patients (25%) required removal of the implant and conversion to fusion, one of whom had deep infection. Kaplan Meier survival analysis revealed a survival of 78% at 5 years (95% CI, 60 – 96%). Previous spinal surgery was significantly related to the time of survival of the implant (p=0.008). Our study has demonstrated a high revision rate for this implant and 54% patient satisfaction. We recommend that patients be counseled regarding these risks and further use of this implant should be subject to the outcome of larger studies and randomised controlled trials.
