Despite multiple trials and case series on hip hemiarthroplasty designs, guidance is still lacking on which implant to use. One particularly deficient area is long-term outcomes. We present over 1,000 consecutive cemented Thompson’s hemiarthroplasties over a ten-year period, recording all accessible patient and implant outcomes. Patient identifiers for a consecutive cohort treated between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2011 were linked to radiographs, surgical notes, clinic letters, and mortality data from a national dataset. This allowed charting of their postoperative course, complications, readmissions, returns to theatre, revisions, and deaths. We also identified all postoperative attendances at the Emergency and Outpatient Departments, and recorded any subsequent skeletal injuries.Aims
Methods
Our aim, using English Hospital Episode Statistics data before
during and after the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial
(DRAFFT), was to assess whether the results of the trial affected
clinical practice. Data were grouped into six month intervals from July 2005 to
December 2014. All patient episodes in the National Health Service
involving emergency surgery for an isolated distal radial fracture
were included.Aims
Patients and Methods
United Kingdom National Institute for Health
and Clinical Excellence guidelines recommend the use of total hip replacement
(THR) for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck
in cognitively intact patients, who were independently mobile prior
to the injury. This study aimed to analyse the risk factors associated
with revision of the implant and mortality following THR, and to
quantify risk. National Joint Registry data recording a THR performed
for acute fracture of the femoral neck between 2003 and 2010 were
analysed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate
the extent to which risk of revision was related to specific covariates.
Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse factors affecting
peri-operative mortality (<
90 days). A total of 4323 procedures
were studied. There were 80 patients who had undergone revision
surgery at the time of censoring (five-year revision rate 3.25%, 95%
confidence interval 2.44 to 4.07) and 137 patients (3.2%) patients
died within 90 days. After adjusting for patient and surgeon characteristics,
an increased risk of revision was associated with the use of cementless
prostheses compared with cemented (hazard ratio (HR) 1.33, p = 0.021).
Revision was independent of bearing surface and head size. The risk
of mortality within 90 days was significantly increased with higher
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (grade 3: odds
ratio (OR) 4.04, p <
0.001; grade 4/5: OR 20.26, p <
0.001;
both compared with grades 1/2) and older age (≥ 75 years: OR 1.65,
p = 0.025), but reduced over the study period (9% relative risk reduction
per year). THR is a good option in patients aged <
75 years and with
ASA 1/2. Cementation of the femoral component does not adversely
affect peri-operative mortality but improves survival of the implant
in the mid-term when compared with cementless femoral components.
There are no benefits of using head sizes >
28 mm or bearings other
than metal-on-polyethylene. More research is required to determine
the benefits of THR over hemiarthroplasty in older patients and
those with ASA grades >
2.
