header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 23 - 23
1 Jan 2014
Hutchinson A Beard D Evans R Topliss C Williams P
Full Access

Introduction:

Historically the incidence of Achilles re-ruptures has been described as around 5% after surgical repair and up to 21% after conservative management. In 2008 we commenced a dedicated Achilles tendon rupture clinic for both conservative and surgically managed patients using new standardised operating procedures (SOP). We have evaluated the impact of this new service, particularly with regard to re-rupture rate.

Materials and methods:

The SOP was stage dependent and included an initial ultrasound examination, functional orthotics with early weight bearing, accelerated exercise and guidelines for the return to work and sport. Evaluation included re-rupture rate, complication rate, and outcome measured by the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and Achilles Tendon Repair Score (AS). A basic cost evaluation was performed to assess any potential savings.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 7 | Pages 915 - 919
1 Jul 2008
AlBuhairan B Hind D Hutchinson A

We reviewed systematically the published evidence on the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for the reduction of wound infection in patients undergoing total hip and total knee replacement. Publications were identified using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. We also contacted authors to identify unpublished trials. We included randomised controlled trials which compared any prophylaxis with none, the administration of systemic antibiotics with that of those in cement, cephalosporins with glycopeptides, cephalosporins with penicillin-derivatives, and second-generation with first-generation cephalosporins.

A total of 26 studies (11 343 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was variable. In a meta-analysis of seven studies (3065 participants) antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the absolute risk of wound infection by 8% and the relative risk by 81% compared with no prophylaxis (p < 0.00001). No other comparison showed a significant difference in clinical effect.

Antibiotic prophylaxis should be routine in joint replacement but the choice of agent should be made on the basis of cost and local availability.