Aims

The significance of the ‘clicky hip’ in neonatal and infant examination remains controversial with recent conflicting papers reigniting the debate. We aimed to quantify rates of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in babies referred with ‘clicky hips’ to our dedicated DDH clinic.

This is the first study in the Ponseti-era to compare severity and outcomes in cases of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) diagnosed antenatally versus those diagnosed at birth. Small pre-Ponseti studies showed antenatal diagnosis to be a predictor of severity and poor prognosis.

Prospective data collection was used to compare indicators of severity and outcomes for idiopathic CTEV between these two groups. These include Pirani score, number of casts, follow-up Roye score and need for surgery.

68 children with 106 affected feet were included. Antenatal diagnosis (AD) was made in 45 children (71 feet), with birth diagnosis (BD) in 23 children (35 feet). Mean follow-up age was 4.8 years (AD = 4.9, BD = 4.7), male:female ratio 2:1 (AD=BD) with bilateral CTEV in 55% (AD = 58%, BD=52%). Mean initial Pirani scores were 5.25 in the AD group vs 4.86 in the BD group (p=0.06). Mean Roye score at follow-up was 1.39/4 in the AD group vs 1.26/4 in the BD group (p=0.33) with 33% vs 30% complaining of pain respectively (p=0.80). Surgery was needed in 11/71 (15.5%) in the AD group vs 1/35 (2.9%) in the BD group (p=0.06))

There is no significant difference in severity between antenatal and birth diagnoses of idiopathic CTEV and no difference in outcomes between these groups when treated with the Ponseti regime. Although small, our sample size is greater than the largest published comparable study.

Conventional teaching advises against using adrenaline with local anaesthetic near end-arteries due to risks of irreversible vasospasm, however there are benefits of adjunctive adrenaline including enhanced anaesthetic effect, prolonged duration and temporary haemostasis.

Retrospective analysis was undertaken for all elective finger and distal palmar surgery using digital nerve or field blocks performed by four orthopaedic hand surgeons, during a two-year period in a large teaching hospital. Data collected from theatre databases and clinical notes included procedure type, anaesthetic agent, adrenaline use, tourniquet use and evidence of post-operative digital ischaemia or wound complications.

230 procedures (mean age 59 years) were performed, including 158 cases with plain anaesthetic only (2%, 1% Lidocaine or 0.25% Bupivicaine in 150, 4 and 4 cases respectively) and 72 cases with 0.25% Bupivicaine and adrenaline (1:200,000.) Mean anaesthetic volume was 7.5ml (7.2ml vs 8.0ml without and with adrenaline respectively.) Tourniquet was used in all cases without adrenaline but was not used in 21 (29%) of cases with adrenaline. Mean tourniquet time in each group was 16 minutes. Two post-operative infections occurred in the group without adrenaline with none in the adrenaline group and there were no cases of digital necrosis in either group

In the elective setting, adjunctive adrenaline with local anaesthetic does not increase the risk of post-operative infections or digital ischaemia. For proximal finger surgery, where digital tourniquets are often restrictive, using adrenaline can prevent the need for painful arm tourniquets.

Shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty is a bone conserving option for patients with glenohumeral arthritis. We report the early results of this procedure at our unit with a minimum follow up of 2 years (mean follow up of 36 months).

A historical analysis of prospectively collected clinical data was reviewed on a consecutive series of 22 patients (mean age of 73 years) with end stage gleno-humeral arthrosis who had undergone humeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty performed by a single surgeon. Pain and function were assessed using the Oxford shoulder score and patient satisfaction was recorded. Radiographs were evaluated for implant loosening.

82% of patients had significant improvement in their oxford shoulder score from pre-operatively to two years post-operatively. Complications included one case of intra-operative conversion to a stemmed hemiarthroplasty due to fracture of the humeral head, one case of adhesive capsulitis that required MUA and arthroscopic capsular release and two cases of revision to a total shoulder replacement for pain. Humeral resurfacing arthroplasty is a viable treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis with good short term results.