header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 58 - 58
1 Sep 2019
Hofste A Soer R Hermens H Oosterveld F Groen G
Full Access

Aim

To systematically review the literature and anatomical atlases on LM morphology.

Methods

Relevant studies were searched in PubMed (Medline) and Science Direct. Anatomical atlases were retrieved from multiple university libraries and online.

Included atlases and studies were assessed at five items: visuals present(y/n), quality of visuals(in-/sufficient), labelling of multifidus (y/n), clear description of region of interest(y/n), description of plane has been described(y/n).

This risk of bias assessment tool was developed to assess the quality of description of anatomy, since existing risk of bias tables have only been developed to assess the methodology of studies.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 2 - 2
1 Sep 2019
Nijeweme - d'Hollosy WO Poel M van Velsen L Groothuis-Oudshoorn C Hermens H Stegeman P Wolff A Reneman M Soer R
Full Access

Aims

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can support clinicians in selecting appropriate treatments for patients. The objective of this study was to examine if triaging patients with LBP to the most optimal treatment can be improved by using a data-driven approach with the help of machine learning as base of such a CDSS.

Methods

A clinical database of the Groningen Spine Center containing patient-reported data from 1546 patients with LBP was used. From this dataset, a training dataset with 354 features was labeled on eight different treatments actually received by these patients. With this dataset, models were trained. A test dataset with 50 cases judged on treatments by 4 experts in LBP triage was used to test these models with data not used to train the models. Prediction accuracy and average area under curve (AUC) were used as performance measures for the models.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 3 - 3
1 Sep 2019
Cabrita M Nijeweme - d'Hollosy WO Jansen-Kosterink S Hermens H
Full Access

Background

Patients with Neck and/or Low Back Pain (NLBP) constitute a heterogeneous group with the prognosis and precise mix of factors involved varying substantially between individuals. This means that a one-size-fits-all approach is not recommended, but methods to tailor treatment to the individual needs are still relatively under-developed. Moreover, the fragmentation of disciplines involved in its study hampers achieving sound answers to clinical questions. Data mining techniques open new horizons by combining data from existing datasets, in order to select the best treatment at each moment in time to a patient based on the individual characteristics.

Method

Within the Back-UP project (H2020 #777090) a multidisciplinary consortium is creating a prognostic model to support more effective and efficient management of NLBP, based on the digital representation of multidimensional clinical information. Patient-specific models provide a personalized evaluation of the patient case, using multidimensional health data from the following sources: (1) psychological, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors, (2) biological patient characteristics, including musculoskeletal structures and function, and molecular data, (3) workplace and lifestyle risk factors.