The minimisation of errors incurred during the learning process is thought to enhance motor learning and improve performance under pressure or in multitasking situations. If this is proven in surgical skills learning, it has the potential to enhance the delivery of surgical education. We aimed to compare errorless and errorful learning using the high-speed burr.

Medical students (n=30) were recruited and allocated randomly to an errorless or errorful group. The errorless learning group progressively learnt tasks from easy to difficult on cedar boards simulating bone. The errorful learning group also progressed through the same tasks but not in order of difficulty.

Transfer tasks assessed students’ performance of cervical laminoplasty on saw bone models to assess their level of learning from previous stages. During transfer task 2, students completed the procedure under time pressure and in the presence of distractors, in order to simulate real-life stressors in theatre. Accuracy, precision and safety of the procedure were scored by expert opinions from spine surgeons blinded to the grouping of the participants.

Both errorless and errorful learners demonstrated improvements in performance with increasing amounts of practice (demonstrated by the decreased time taken for the task as well as improvement in accuracy of the cuts (depth, width and smoothness). The performance of both groups was not impaired by the incorporation of a secondary task which required participants to multitask. No statistically significant difference in performance was noted between the two groups.

In contrast to previous research, there was no significant difference between errorless or errorful learning to develop skills with a high-speed, side-cutting burr. In both groups, practical learning during the session has led to improvement in overall performance with the burr relevant to cervical laminoplasty.

Aims

The aim of this study was to report the medium-term outcomes of impaction bone allograft and fibular grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and to define the optimal indications.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether it would be feasible to use oblique lumbar interbody fixation for patients with degenerative lumbar disease who required a fusion but did not have a spondylolisthesis.

A series of CT digital images from 60 patients with abdominal disease were reconstructed in three dimensions (3D) using Mimics v10.01: a digital cylinder was superimposed on the reconstructed image to simulate the position of an interbody screw. The optimal entry point of the screw and measurements of its trajectory were recorded. Next, 26 cadaveric specimens were subjected to oblique lumbar interbody fixation on the basis of the measurements derived from the imaging studies. These were then compared with measurements derived directly from the cadaveric vertebrae.

Our study suggested that it is easy to insert the screws for L1/2, L2/3 and L3/4 fixation: there was no significant difference in measurements between those of the 3-D digital images and the cadaveric specimens. For L4/5 fixation, part of L5 inferior articular process had to be removed to achieve the optimal trajectory of the screw. For L5/S1 fixation, the screw heads were blocked by iliac bone: consequently, the interior oblique angle of the cadaveric specimens was less than that seen in the 3D digital images.

We suggest that CT scans should be carried out pre-operatively if this procedure is to be adopted in clinical practice. This will assist in determining the feasibility of the procedure and will provide accurate information to assist introduction of the screws.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:977–82.