header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 10 | Pages 825 - 833
8 Oct 2021
Dailey HL Schwarzenberg P Webb, III EB Boran SAM Guerin S Harty JA

Aims

The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking.

Methods

Patients were treated in a single level I trauma centre over a 2.5-year period. Group allocation was not randomized; both the micromotion nail and standard-of-care static locking nails (control group) were commercially available and selected at the discretion of the treating surgeons. Injury risk levels were quantified using the Nonunion Risk Determination (NURD) score. Radiological healing was assessed until 24 weeks or clinical union. Low-dose CT scans were acquired at 12 weeks and virtual mechanical testing was performed to objectively assess structural bone healing.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1186 - 1191
1 Sep 2010
Dineen PF Curtin RJ Harty JA

Antiplatelet agents are widely prescribed for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. A common clinical problem facing orthopaedic and trauma surgeons is how to manage patients receiving these agents who require surgery, either electively or following trauma. The dilemma is to balance the risk of increased blood loss if the antiplatelet agents are continued peri-operatively against the risk of coronary artery/stent thrombosis and/or other vascular event if the drugs are stopped. The traditional approach of stopping these medications up to two weeks before surgery appears to pose significant danger to patients and may require review.

This paper covers the important aspects regarding the two most commonly prescribed antiplatelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 262 - 262
1 Sep 2005
Harty JA Butt K Bryan K Mullan GB
Full Access

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Acrylic Bone Cement is a polymer used to anchor the prosthesis during Joint Replacement Surgery. Arthroplasty with Bone Cement is associated with late loosening, compromising prosthetic stability leading to Revision arthroplasty. Different irrigating solutions such as Hydrogen Peroxide or Saline are used during arthroplasty. The aim of the study was to analyse the effects of Hydrogen Peroxide on the mechanical properties of Bone Cement.

Materials and Methods: Cement was mixed as per standard methods used in theatre, in a vacuum and at a temp of 18 degrees centigrade. Once the cement was mixed it was then placed in conical moulds and the exposed surface was either exposed to saline or Hydrogen Peroxide solution (6% from a standard theatre preparation). We studied the effect of Hydrogen Peroxide on Dough time, Curing time, Surface Analysis and Hardness of PMMA. Dough time was performed with latex examination gloves. Curing time was measured at 15 seconds intervals using a Vickers hardness transistor. Cement hardness was assessed using the same machine. Surface analysis was performed by preparing the samples using a grit rotaforce machine. Palacos Bone Cement was used and tests were conducted according to ASTM F-451 and ISO 5833 standards.

Results: The samples exposed to hydrogen peroxide showed an increase in the dough time in comparison to the controls from 3.5 minutes to 5 minutes. Curing time showed a difference of 13.5 minutes for the controls as opposed to 17 minutes for the HP contaminated samples. Surface hardness reduced from a mean of 17.5hv to 14.3hv after exposure to hydrogen peroxide (p< 0.05). There was increased staining of the Hydrogen Peroxide sample, with surface irregularities, and an associated increase in surface porosity. Surface porosity increased from 120um (SD 11.2) to 180um (SD 8.7) (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: We have shown that the use of hydrogen peroxide contamination of bone cement interferes with the biomechanical properties of the cement, leading to an overall reduction in strength and hardness of the cement. This may lead to an associated reduction in the strength of the bone cement interface and precipitate early micro-motion and loosening of the prosthesis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 340 - 340
1 Nov 2002
Harty JA Quinlan JF Soffe KE Hassan S Walsh MG Byrne JO
Full Access

Objective: To date the principal focus of the mechanism of cervical spine fracture has been directed at head/ neck circumference and spinal canal dimensions. However the role of other measurements, including chest diameter and head/neck/chest proportional ratios, in a standard cervical fracture population has not yet been studied in detail. Cervical fractures often involve flexion/ extension type mechanisms of injury, with the head and cervical spine flexing/extending, using the thorax as a fulcrum.

Study design: We prospectively studied all patients with cervical spine fractures who were admitted to the spinal injuries unit from 1st July, 2000 to 1st March 2001. Anthropometrical measurement of head circumference, neck circumference, chest circumference, and neck length were analysed. Ages ranged from 18 – 55yrs, and all patients with concomitant cervical pathology were excluded from the study. Mechanism of injury involved flexion/extension type injuries in all cases; those with direct axial loading were excluded. A control group of 30 patients (age 18–55yrs) involved in high velocity trauma with associated long bone fractures, in whom cervical injury was suspected but without any cervical fracture, or associated pathology, were measured.

Results: Our analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in chest size in the male control group versus the fracture group 98.89cm v. 94.19cm (P< 0.05, t-test). There was a correspondingly significant increase in chest circumference between the female control versus the fracture group 94.33cm v. 88.88cm(P< 0.05, t-test). Our results revealed no statistical difference in either head circumference, neck circumference, or neck length between each of the groupings. However we found a statistically significant increase in head/neck/chest ratios between each of the groups. These results indicate a proportionately larger chest may be protective in cervical spine fractures.