This study evaluates the need for limb reconstruction surgery in Syria and gives examples of how this service has been delivered by UK surgeons. The conflict in Syria has resulted in over 500,000 deaths and 1.2 million injured. There is not yet a centre for limb reconstruction surgery in the country. Injuries from gunshots and shrapnel were not common prior to the civil war resulting in a paucity of experience. The senior author spent two weeks in Syria to perform limb reconstruction surgery, to help to train local surgeons and assess the capacity of the facilities available to cope with the limb reconstruction workload.Introduction
Methods
The aim of this retrospective multicentre study was to evaluate
mid-term results of the operative treatment of Monteggia-like lesions
and to determine the prognostic factors that influence the clinical
and radiological outcome. A total of 46 patients (27 women and 19 men), with a mean age
of 57.7 years (18 to 84) who had sustained a Monteggia-like lesion
were followed up clinically and radiologically after surgical treatment.
The Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), Mayo Elbow Performance Score
(MEPS), Broberg and Morrey Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder
and Hand (DASH) score were used for evaluation at a mean of 65 months
(27 to 111) postoperatively. All ulnar fractures were stabilized
using a proximally contoured or precontoured locking compression
plate. Mason type I fractures of the radial head were treated conservatively, type
II fractures were treated with reconstruction, and type III fractures
with arthroplasty. All Morrey type II and III fractures of the coronoid
process was stabilized using lag screws.Aims
Patients and Methods
The Essex-Lopresti injury (ELI) of the forearm
is a rare and serious condition which is often overlooked, leading
to a poor outcome. The purpose of this retrospective case study was to establish
whether early surgery can give good medium-term results. From a group of 295 patients with a fracture of the radial head,
12 patients were diagnosed with ELI on MRI which confirmed injury
to the interosseous membrane (IOM) and ligament (IOL). They were
treated by reduction and temporary Kirschner (K)-wire stabilisation
of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). In addition, eight patients
had a radial head replacement, and two a radial head reconstruction. All patients were examined clinically and radiologically 59 months
(25 to 90) after surgery when the mean Mayo Modified Wrist Score
(MMWS) was 88.4 (78 to 94), the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Scores
(MEPS) 86.7 (77 to 95) and the mean disabilities of arm, shoulder
and hand (DASH) score 20.5 (16 to 31): all of these indicate a good outcome. In case of a high index of suspicion for ELI in patients with
a radial head fracture, we recommend the following: confirmation
of IOM and IOL injury with an early MRI scan; early surgery with
reduction and temporary K-wire stabilisation of the DRUJ; preservation
of the radial head if at all possible or replacement if not, and
functional bracing in supination. This will increase the prospect
of a good result, and avoid the complications of a missed diagnosis
and the difficulties of late treatment. Cite this article:
Ankle fractures account for 10% of all fractures. Most deformed looking ankles are manipulated in the emergency departments (ED) on clinical judgement in order to improve the outcome and avoid skin complications. It is accepted that significantly displaced ankle injuries with neurovascular (NV) compromise or critical skin should be reduced prior to imaging. However, is it really possible to understand the injury to an ankle without an x-ray or other imaging? The other possible injuries around the ankle, presenting with swelling and deformity of the ankle region, may include a ligamentous, talar, subtalar, Chopart joint or calcaneal injury. Does the risk of waiting for the imaging outweigh the benefit of manipulation of an undiagnosed injury? This prospective study involved the analysis of all patients with ankle injuries referred to orthopaedics between November 2009 and February 2010. Results: Over the audited period 100 referrals were identified (43 male, 57 female). The average age was 50.4 years (range 5–89). Only 2% of fractures were open. Manipulation in the ED was performed for 44% of patients. Of these, 39% (17 cases) were manipulated and supported in plaster slab without an initial x-ray; 3 due to vascular deficit, 2 due to critical skin and 12 with no documented reason! Re-manipulation in the ED as well as definitive open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were significantly lower in those patients who had an x-ray prior to manipulation (p < 0.05). ORIF was performed in 68% of all patients. Importantly, 80% of ankles manipulated in ED went on to have ORIF which was significantly higher than the 47% in the non-manipulation cohort (p < 0.05). We conclude that taking ankle injury radiographs prior to any attempt at manipulation, in the absence of NV deficit or critical skin, will constitute best practice.
The aim of this study was to determine current practice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction amongst BASK members. This was an internet-based survey where members were invited to complete a questionnaire on ACL reconstruction. Of the 365 BASK surgeons performing ACL reconstruction, 241 completed the questionnaire (response rate 66%). 147(61%) of surgeons used both hamstring and patellar tendon grafts, 71(29%) used only hamstrings and 21(9%) used patellar tendon only. All surgeons used ipsilateral autograft. 157 (65%) used the transtibial technique for femoral tunnel placement with 80(33%) using the anteromedial portal technique. Of those using the anteromedial portal, the most common femoral fixation devices were the Endobutton (34%) and RCI screw (34%). Interference screw fixation (81%) was the most common tibial fixation in the same group of surgeons with the RCI screw being the most common (63%). 19% (45/241) of surgeons were performing double bundle ACL reconstructions in select cases. Hamstring femoral fixation was with a suspension device in 79% and interference screw in 18%. Of those using a suspension device the Endobutton was most common (48%) followed by Transfix (26%) and Rigidfix (19%). Tibial fixation was most commonly achieved by interference screw (57%) followed by Intrafix (30%). With patellar tendon graft the most popular femoral fixation was with an interference screw (66%) followed by suspension (34%). All surgeons used interference screw for tibial fixation. 90% of surgeons (217) allow immediate full weight-bearing as tolerated irrespective of fixation type with 8% delaying full weight bearing between 1 and 3 weeks. The results show the wide spread of variation in practice of ACL reconstruction. With recent renewed interest in a more anatomic placement of tunnels, the use of the anteromedial portal may continue to increase. With such a wide variation in techniques, grafts and fixation implants used, a register may help assess outcomes.
Current evidence on the indications for and efficacy of non-rigid lumbar stabilisation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to review the outcome of the DYNESYS system (Zimmer, Inc.) in a consecutive series of 34 patients undergoing this procedure between 2001 and 2006. Prospectively collected outcome measure data obtained pre-operatively and at 1 year post-operatively was analysed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed using revision surgery as the end point. Cox Regression was utilised to identify variables that were related to implant survival. Pain rating on the visual analogue scale improved from a mean of 7 pre-op to 4 at 1 year (p=0.009), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores from 13 to 9 (p=0.02), Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire from 13 to 9 (p=0.03). When reporting subjective outcome, 54% of patients reported “better” or “much better” outcomes at last followup (12–69 months post op). Eight patients (25%) required removal of the implant and conversion to fusion, one of whom had deep infection. Kaplan Meier survival analysis revealed a survival of 78% at 5 years (95% CI, 60 – 96%). Previous spinal surgery was significantly related to the time of survival of the implant (p=0.008). Our study has demonstrated a high revision rate for this implant and 54% patient satisfaction. We recommend that patients be counseled regarding these risks and further use of this implant should be subject to the outcome of larger studies and randomised controlled trials.
86 patients (70.5%) were diagnosed with transient synovitis. All the 7 re-admissions were from this group. Only one of the re-admissions was diagnosed with confirmed septic arthritis. 4 patients (3.3%) were diagnosed with definite septic arthritis with positive cultures from the hip, and 1 (0.8%) with probable septic arthritis (negative culture). The presence of the clinical predictors was compared between the transient synovitis and septic arthritis groups, using Fisher’s exact test. Only the raised temperature and CRP were found to be significantly different (p<
0.05). Only two children (40%) with confirmed septic arthritis had four or more predictors (one had all five, and the other was able to partially weight bear). The third child had a raised temperature and CRP, and the fourth had a raised temperature only. The fifth patient (20%) was diagnosed with probable septic arthritis. His cultures were negative, but he was already on intravenous antibiotics. This patient did not have any of the predictors on admission (temperature was 38.3°C, CRP 10.7). However, he spiked a temperature of 40°C 24 hours post admission despite being on antibiotics, and his CRP increased to 34.5mg/L. In the transient synovitis group, two patients (2.2%) had positive five predictors, but were proven to have transient synovitis secondary to a urinary tract infection and gastroenteritis. 47 patients (51.6%) did not have any of the predictors, and 6 patients (6.6%) had three or more positive predictors.
