header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 2 | Pages 202 - 204
1 Mar 2002
Odinsson A Finsen V

Our aim was to determine if a tourniquet placed on the forearm has any advantage in clinical practice over the usual position on the upper arm. We randomised 50 patients who were undergoing an open operation for carpal tunnel syndrome under local anaesthesia into two groups. One had a tourniquet on the upper arm and the other on the forearm. The blood pressure, pulse, and level of pain were recorded at intervals of five minutes during the operation. The surgeons were also asked to evaluate the quality of the anaesthesia, the bloodless field, and the site of the tourniquet.

The patients tolerated the tourniquet on the upper arm and forearm equally well. The surgeons had some difficulties when it was placed on the forearm. We therefore recommend placement of a tourniquet on the upper arm for operations on the hand and wrist which are carried out under local anaesthesia.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 1 | Pages 133 - 136
1 Jan 1996
Finsen V Russwurm H

In nine patients of median age 34 years who had sustained an amputation of the thumb at a median 24 (5 to 131) months previously, we lengthened the first metacarpal by 30 (17 to 36) mm. Seven amputations had been through the proximal phalanx and two through the metacarpal.

The first two patients had autogenous grafting at a second stage, but the other seven had callotasis alone. In these patients the external fixators were removed at a median 189 (115 to 271) days after osteotomy. In six cases the adductor pollicis tendon was transferred proximally and the first web deepened. There was late fracture or palmar flexion of the callus in five patients, but this required further surgery in only one. Treatment was complete at 326 (140 to 489) days after osteotomy. The extended thumb retained its sensitivity; both grasp and key-pinch strength were satisfactory and only one patient felt that the result did not warrant the long course of treatment.

Metacarpal lengthening by this method is a prolonged procedure, but provides a valuable alternative to more complex reconstructions.