Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most
common operations in orthopaedic surgery worldwide. Despite its
scientific reputation as mainly successful, only 81% to 89% of patients
are satisfied with the final result. Our understanding of this discordance
between patient and surgeon satisfaction is limited. In our experience,
focus on five major factors can improve patient satisfaction rates:
correct patient selection, setting of appropriate expectations,
avoiding preventable complications, knowledge of the finer points
of the operation, and the use of both pre- and post-operative pathways.
Awareness of the existence, as well as the identification of predictors
of patient–surgeon discordance should potentially help with enhancing
patient outcomes. Cite this article:
In this study we present our experience with
four generations of uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from Smith
&
Nephew: Tricon M, Tricon LS, Tricon II and Profix, focusing
on the failure rates correlating with each design change. Beginning
in 1984, 380 Tricon M, 435 Tricon LS, 305 Tricon 2 and 588 Profix
were implanted by the senior author. The rate of revision for loosening
was 1.1% for the Tricon M, 1.1% for the Tricon LS, 0.5% for the
Tricon 2 with a HA coated tibial component, and 1.3% for the Profix
TKA. No loosening of the femoral component was seen with the Tricon
M, Tricon LS or Tricon 2, with no loosening seen of the tibial component
with the Profix TKA. Regarding revision for wear, the incidence
was 13.1% for the Tricon M, 6.6% for the Tricon LS, 2.3% for the
Tricon 2, and 0% for the Profix. These results demonstrate that
improvements in the design of uncemented components, including increased
polyethylene thickness, improved polyethylene quality, and the introduction
of hydroxyapatite coating, has improved the outcomes of uncemented
TKA over time.
