Reorientating pelvic osteotomies are performed to improve femoral head coverage and secondary degenerative arthritis. A rectangular triple pelvic innominate osteotomy (3PIO) is performed in symptomatic cases. However, deciding optimal screw fixation type to avoid complications is questionable. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the biomechanical behavior of two different acetabular screw configurations used for rectangular 3PIO osteosynthesis. It was hypothesized that bi-directional screw fixation would be biomechanically superior to mono-axial screw fixation technique.

A rectangular 3PIO was performed in twelve right-side artificial Hemi-pelvises. Group 1 (G1) had two axial and one transversal screw in a bi-directional orientation. Group 2 (G2) had three screws in the axial direction through the iliac crest. Acetabular fragment was reoriented to 10.5° inclination in coronal plane, and 10.0° increased anteversion along axial plane. Specimens were biomechanically tested until failure under progressively increasing cyclic loading at 2Hz, starting at 50N peak compression, increasing 0.05N/cycle. Stiffness was calculated from machine data. Acetabular anteversion, inclination and medialization were evaluated from motion tracking data from 250-2500 at 250 cycle increments. Failure cycles and load were evaluated for 5° change in anteversion.

Stiffness was higher in G1 (56.46±19.45N/mm) versus G2 (39.02±10.93N/mm) but not significantly, p=0.31. Acetabular fragment anteversion, inclination and medialization increased significantly each group (p≤0.02) and remained non-significantly different between the groups (p≥0.69). Cycles to failure and failure load were not significantly different between G1 (4406±882, 270.30±44.10N) and G2 (5059±682, 302.95±34.10N), p=0.78.

From a biomechanical perspective, the present study demonstrates that a bi-directional screw orientation does not necessarily advantageous versus mono-axial alignment when the latter has all three screws evenly distributed over the osteotomy geometry. Moreover, the 3PIO fixation is susceptible to changes in anteversion, inclination and medialization of the acetabular fragment until the bone is healed. Therefore, cautious rehabilitation with partial weight-bearing is recommended.

Cartilage diseases have a significant impact on the patient's quality of life and are a heavy burden for the healthcare system. Better understanding, early detection and proper follow-up could improve quality of life and reduce healthcare related costs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate if difference between osteoarthritic (OA) and non-osteoarthritic (non-OA) knees can be detected quantitatively on cartilage and subchondral bone levels with advanced but clinical available imaging techniques.

Two OA (mean age = 88.3 years) and three non-OA (mean age = 51.0 years) human cadaveric knees were scanned two times. A high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) scan (XtremeCT, Scanco Medical AG, Switzerland) was performed to quantify the bone microstructure. A contrast-enhanced clinical CT scan (GE Revolution Evo, GE Medical Systems AG, Switzerland) was acquired with the contrast agent Visipaque 320 (60 ml) to measure cartilage. Subregions dividing the condyle in four parts were identified semi-automatically and the images were segmented using adaptive thresholding. Microstructural parameters of subchondral bone and cartilage thickness were quantified.

The overall cartilage thickness was reduced by 0.27 mm between the OA and non-OA knees and the subchondral bone quality decreased accordingly (reduction of 33.52 % in BV/TV in the layer from 3 to 8 mm below the cartilage) for the femoral medial condyle. The largest differences were observed at the medial part of the femoral medial condyle both for cartilage and for bone parameters, corresponding to clinical observations.

Subchondral bone microstructural parameters and cartilage thickness were quantified using in vivo available imaging and apparent differences between the OA and non-OA knees were detected. Those results may improve OA follow-up and diagnosis and could lead to a better understanding of OA. However, further in vivo studies are needed to validate these methods in clinical practice.

Despite past advances of implant technologies, complication rates of fixations remain high at challenging sites such as the proximal humerus [1]. These may not only be owed to the implant itself but also to dissatisfactory surgical execution of fracture reduction and implant positioning. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the instrumentation accuracy of a highly standardised and guided procedure and its influence on the biomechanical outcome and predicted failure risk.

Preoperative planning of osteotomies creating an unstable 3-part fracture and fixation with a locking plate was performed based on CT scans of eight pairs of low-density proximal humerus samples from elderly female donors (85.2±5.4 years). 3D-printed subject-specific guides were used to osteotomise and instrument the samples according to the pre-OP plan. Instrumentation accuracies in terms of screw lengths and orientations were evaluated by comparing post-OP CT scans with the pre-OP plan. The fixation constructs were biomechanically tested until cyclic cut-out failure [2]. Failure risks of the planned and the post-OP configurations were predicted using a validated sample-specific finite element (FE) simulation approach [2] and correlated with the experimental outcomes.

Small deviations were found for the instrumented screw trajectories compared to the planned configuration in the proximal-distal (0.3±1.3º) and anterior-posterior directions (-1.7±1.8º), and for screw tip to joint distances (-0.3±1.1 mm). Significantly higher failure risk was predicted for the post-OP compared to the planned configurations (p<0.01) via FE. When incorporating the instrumentation inaccuracies, the biomechanical results could be predicted well with FE (R²=0.70).

Despite the high instrumentation accuracy achieved using sophisticated subject-specific 3D-printed guides, even minor deviations from the pre-OP plan significantly increased the FE-predicted risk of failure. This underlines the importance of intraoperative guiding technology [3] in tandem with careful pre-OP planning to assist surgeons to achieve optimal outcomes.

Acknowledgements

This study was performed with the assistance of the AO Foundation via the AOTRAUMA Network.

Unstable distal tibia fractures are challenging injuries requiring surgical treatment. Intramedullary nails are frequently used; however, distal fragment fixation problems may arise, leading to delayed healing, malunion or nonunion. Recently, a novel angle-stable locking nail design has been developed that maintains the principle of relative construct stability, but introduces improvements expected to reduce nail toggling, screw migration and secondary loss of reduction, without the requirement for additional intraoperative procedures.

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of a novel angle-stable intramedullary nail concept for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures, compared to a conventional nail in a human cadaveric model under dynamic loading.

Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae with a simulated AO/OTA 42-A3.1 fracture were assigned to 2 groups for reamed intramedullary nailing using either a conventional (non-angle-stable) Expert Tibia Nail with 3 distal screws (Group 1) or the novel Tibia Nail Advanced system with 2 distal angle-stable locking low-profile screws (Group 2). The specimens were biomechanically tested under conditions including quasi-static and progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation until failure of the bone-implant construct, with monitoring by means of motion tracking.

Initial axial construct stiffness, although being higher in Group 2, did not significantly differ between the 2 nail systems, p=0.29. In contrast, initial torsional construct stiffness was significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1, p=0.04. Initial nail toggling of the distal tibia fragment in varus and flexion was lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1, being significant in flexion, p=0.91 and p=0.03, respectively. After 5000 cycles, interfragmentary movements in terms of varus, flexion, internal rotation, axial displacement and shear displacement at the fracture site were all lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1, with flexion and shear displacement being significant, p=0.14, p=0.04, p=0.25, p=0.11 and p=0.04, respectively. Cycles to failure until both interfragmentary 5° varus and 5° flexion were significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1, p=0.04.

From a biomechanical perspective, the novel angle-stable intramedullary nail concept has the potential of achieving a higher initial axial and torsional relative stability and maintaining it with a better resistance towards loss of reduction under dynamic loading, while reducing the number of distal locking screws, compared to conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures.