Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful procedure, yet access to arthroplasty is limited in many developing nations. In response, organizations around the world have conducted service trips to provide international arthroplasty care to underserved populations. Little outcomes data are currently available related to these trips. We present a 1-year follow up. We completed an arthroplasty service trip to Brazil in 2017 where we performed 46 THAs on 38 patients. Patient demographic data, comorbidity profile, complication data, and pre- and postoperative Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), PROMIS Short Form Pain (SF-Pain), PROMIS Short Form Physical Function (SF-Function), and HOOS Jr scores were collected. Outcomes were collected postoperatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 1 year. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify associations between patient factors and 12-week outcomes.Background
Methods
Total hip replacement is a highly successful procedure, yet access to arthroplasty is limited in many developing nations. In response, organizations in the United States have conducted service trips to provide international arthroplasty care to underserved populations. Little outcomes data are currently available related to these trips. We aimed to assess patient outcomes following total hip arthroplasty performed on a surgical mission trip. We completed an arthroplasty service trip to Brazil during which we performed 46 total hip arthroplasties (THA) on 38 patients. Patient demographic data, comorbidity profile, complication data, and pre- and postoperative Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), PROMIS Short Form Pain (SF-Pain), PROMIS Short Form Physical Function (SF-Function), and HOOS Jr scores were collected. Baseline and final follow-up scores were compared. In addition, we utilized a novel questionnaire that was designed to determine outcomes most relevant to patients receiving joint replacements in developing countries. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify associations between patient factors and outcomes.Background
Methods
