Gastrocnemius tightness predisposes to musculoskeletal pathology
and may require surgical treatment. However, it is not clear what
proportion of patients with foot and ankle pathology have clinically
significant gastrocnemius tightness. The aim of this study was to
compare the prevalence and degree of gastrocnemius tightness in
a control group of patients with a group of patients with foot and
ankle pathology. This prospective, case-matched, observational study compared
gastrocnemius tightness, as assessed by the lunge test, in a control
group and a group with foot and ankle pathology. Gastrocnemius tightness
was calculated as the difference in dorsiflexion of the ankle with
the knee extended and flexed.Aims
Patients and Methods
Smoking is associated with post-operative complications but smokers
often under-report the amount they smoke. Our objective was to determine
whether a urine dipstick test could be used as a substitute for
quantitative cotinine assays to determine smoking status in patients. Between September 2013 and July 2014 we conducted a prospective
cohort study in which 127 consecutive patients undergoing a planned
foot and ankle arthrodesis or osteotomy were included. Patients
self-reported their smoking status and were classified as: ‘never
smoked’ (61 patients), ‘ex-smoker’ (46 patients), or ‘current smoker’ (20
patients). Urine samples were analysed with cotinine assays and
cotinine dipstick tests.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study used the lunge test to measure the difference between ankle dorsiflexion with the knee flexed and extended in persons with and without foot and ankle pathology. This may help us devise a weight bearing test for GT. There is little credible research comparing GT in people with and without foot and ankle pathology. There is no normative data for ankle dorsiflexion range measured using a Lunge test and prevalence of GT in the normal population. 97 ankles with foot and ankle (FA) pathology and 89 ankles of healthy volunteers (HV) without FA pathology were recruited from the royal national orthopaedic hospital (RNOH). Degrees of ankle dorsiflexion range were measured using an inclinometer and a version of the lunge test with the knee flexed and extended. These findings were then compared between groups.Rationale
Methodology
Wound healing and poor bone healing are complications seen in patients who smoke and some surgeons prefer not to operate on smokers. However, self reporting of smoking by patients may be biased. This study compares self-reporting of smoking habits and cotinine levels in the urine of our patients. 77 patients admitted for an osteotomy or arthrodesis procedure between September 2013 and May 2014 agreed to participate in this study. A questionnaire was completed and a urine sample was obtained and tested for cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine, by 2 techniques: a dipstick, the COT One Step Cotinine Test, yielding a positive result when the cotinine in the urine exceeds 200 ng/mL and the Concateno laboratory assay test, providing a mean value to give a qualitative reading whereby the cut off for non-smokers is 500ng/ml.Introduction:
Method:
Bone Marrow Oedema Syndrome (BMOS) is an unusual and poorly understood condition. It commonly affects the hips and knees and is reported to have a tendency to recur. The foot and ankle are less frequently involved but nevertheless patients can be severely impaired. Only case reports of BMOS of the foot and ankle have been published. The aim of this study is to evaluate the sites of occurrence, risk factors, efficacy of immobilisation, response to intravenous biphosphonates and local or remote recurrence over the following years. A retrospective review of 25 adult patients who have been diagnosed with BMOS have been followed-up for an average of 5.8 years (range: 2–11). Six patients have not been traced.Introduction
Methods
The focus on evidence-based medicine has led to calls for increased levels of evidence in surgical journals. The purpose of the present study was to review the levels of evidence in articles published in the foot and ankle literature and to assess changes in the level of evidence over a decade. All articles from the years 2000 and 2010 in Foot and Ankle International, Foot and Ankle Surgery, and all foot and ankle articles from JBJS A and JBJS B were analysed. Animal, cadaveric, basic science, editorials, surveys, letters to Editor and correspondence were excluded. Articles were ranked by a five-point level of evidence scale, according to guidelines from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine.Background
Methods
The Z or “scarf” osteotomy was first described by Meyer in 1926 and then by Burutaran in 1976. It was later popularised by Weil in the USA and Barouk in Europe in the 1990's and is now an accepted technique that forms part of a surgeons' armamentarium. The theory of Diffusion of Innovations was described by Rogers in 1962 to explain how novel ideas are accepted into practice across different industries, including medicine. It has never previously been used to study the adoption of ideas in foot and ankle surgery. This paper uses publication volume as a surrogate marker for adoption, as described previously by the authors. Briefly, a systematic review of the literature was carried out. MESH headings included ‘Hallux Valgus’, and ‘osteotomy’ or ‘SCARF’ or ‘Z osteotomy’ or ‘bunionectomy’. 2818 publications were identified and the abstracts were reviewed excluding 2699 publications for non-relevance. The data was analysed by year of publication, country of origin, as well as for level of evidence.Introduction
Methods
Calcaneal osteotomy is often performed together with other procedures to correct hindfoot deformity. There are various methods of fixation ranging from staples, headed or headless screws or more recently stepped locking plates. It is not clear if one method is superior to the other. In this series we compare the outcome of various methods of fixation with particular attention to the need for subsequent hardware removal. A retrospective review of the records of a consecutive series of patients who had a calcaneal osteotomy performed in our unit within the last 5 years was undertaken. All patients had had their osteotomy through an extended lateral approach to their calcaneous. The subsequent fixation was performed using one of three methods; a lateral plate placed through the same incision; a ‘headless’; or a ‘headed’ screw through a separate stab incision inserted through the infero-posterior heel. Records were kept of subsequent symptoms from the hardware and need for metalwork removal as well as any complications. When screws were inserted the entry point in relation to the weight-bearing surface of the calcaneous was also recorded.Introduction
Patients and Methods
Single stage total We performed single stage total Fusion was achieved in 7 feet (64%) at an average time of 17 weeks. In 4 patients, non-union persisted but they were pain free at latest review and would not consider further surgery. Average duration of follow-up was 20 months (range 6–24 months). All patients had stiff hindfeet with a jog of movement at the Total
Debate remains which surgical technique should be used for ankle arthrodesis. Several open approaches have been described, as well as the arthroscopic method, using a variety of fixation devices. Both arthroscopic and open procedures have good results with union rates of 93–95%, 3% malunion rate and patient satisfaction of 70–90%, although some report complication rates as high as 40%. To identify union, complication and patient satisfaction rates with open ankle fusions (using the plane between EHL and tibialis anterior).Introduction
Aims
Following recommendations in the NHS Plan, all Trusts in the UK now send copies of correspondence to patients as standard practice. It is not clear whether patients wish to receive such correspondence, nor whether this practices an additional workload on the NHS as patients seek clarification on the medical terminology used in their letters. We surveyed 90 consecutive patients in three Consultant Foot & Ankle surgeons' new outpatient clinics at our institution. Sixty patients received a copy of the letter sent to their GP (standard practice) and 30 patients received a letter in plain English addressed to the patient and a copy was sent to the GP (new practice). Patients were sent a cover letter explaining the study a copy of their clinic note and also a questionnaire that asked details about their preferred methods of communication. In addition qualitative interviews with 4 GP Partners were carried out to harbour their opinions.Introduction
Methods
There are approximately 1.2 million patients using orthotics in the UK costing the NHS in excess of £100 million per annum. Despite this, there is little data available to determine efficacy and patient compliance. There have been a few reports on patient satisfaction, which indicate that between 13-50% of patients are dissatisfied with their orthotics. Our aim was to evaluate patient reported satisfaction with orthotics prescribed and to investigate the reasons behind patient dissatisfaction. Seventy consecutive patients receiving foot orthoses at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital were retrospectively asked to complete a questionnaire and to bring their shoes and orthotics to research clinic. The inside width of the shoes and corresponding width of the orthotic were measured. A semi-structured interview was carried out on 10 patients, including those that were satisfied or unsatisfied, using qualitative research methods to identify issues that are important to patients.Introduction
Methods
A posterior AFO that holds the foot in dorsiflexion. The amount of dorsiflexion could be adjusted. An anterior AFO that keeps the ankle and foot in plantigrade, with no adjustment to the amount of dorsiflexion.
In the belief that many of the barriers that patients face when deciding upon an ankle or hindfoot fusion procedure stem from inadequate information about the procedure and its outcomes, the novel concept of a “Fusion forum” has been developed: a nurse-led informal group meeting to facilitate patients’ understanding and perception of fusion procedures. The aims were to provide more in-depth information than it is possible to deliver during the limited time of an initial doctor-patient consultation, to get the patient to meet and question a guest (an expatient who has previously had a fusion procedure) and to allow patients time to reflect upon their choices. The value of the fusion forum has been evaluated by a questionnaire which was completed by the first 48 patients who attended the forum. 96% (46/48) of respondents felt that the quality of information that they were given was excellent or good. No respondent thought that the information was unsatisfactory. Patients were asked how valuable they had found meeting the guest. Four patients did not respond to this question. All of the respondents thought that meeting another patient who had already undergone the procedure was excellent or good The mechanics of setting up a foot and ankle fusion forum is discussed, along with the lessons learnt from the first cohort of patients. This process has been found to greatly increase patient understanding of arthrodesis. It has been found during the consent process in pre-admission clinic that patients demonstrate a more in-depth understanding of the operative procedure, a more comprehensive knowledge of what the whole process involves, as well as the relative risks and benefits and the expected time of recovery.
This study does not refute the distal metatarsal articular angle as an entity, but does confirm the inaccuracy of extrapolating the DMAA from plain AP radiographs.