Tenotomy of the iliopsoas tendon has been described as an effective procedure to treat refractive groin pain induced by iliopsoas tendinitis. However, the procedure forces the rectus femoris to act as the primary hip flexor and little is known about the long-term effects of this procedure on the peri-articular muscle envelope (PAME). Studies suggest that iliopsoas tenotomy results in atrophy of the iliopsoas and decreased hip flexion strength with poorer outcomes, increasing the susceptibility for secondary tendinopathy. The aim of this study is to describe changes in the PAME following psoas release.

All patients who presented for clinical examination at our hospital between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who presented after psoas tenotomy with groin pain and who were unable to actively lift the leg against gravity, were included. Pelvic MRI was taken. Qualitative muscle evaluation was done with the Quartile classification system. Quantitative muscle evaluation was done by establishing the cross-sectional area (CSA).

Two independent observers evaluated the ipsi- and contralateral PAME twice. The muscles were evaluated on the level: iliacus, psoas, gluteus minimus-medius-maximus, rectus femoris, tensor fasciae lata, piriformis, obturator externus and internus.

For the qualitative evaluation, the intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated by using kappastatistics. A Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability for the quantitative evaluation. The Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the changes between the ipsi- and contra-lateral side.

17 patients were included in the study. Following psoas tenotomy, CSA reduced in the ipsilateral gluteus maximus, if compared with the contralateral side. Fatty degeneration occurred in the tensor fascia latae. Both CSA reduction and fatty degeneration was seen for psoas, iliacus, gluteus minimus, piriformis, obturator externus and internus. No CSA reduction and fatty degeneration was seen for gluteus medius and rectus femoris.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) surgery is a physical and cognitive challenge for surgeons. Data on stress levels, cognitive and physical load of orthopaedic surgeons, as well as ergonomic impact, are limited. With and without the use of an automated impaction device, operational efficiency and the surgeon's ergonomic, mental, and physical load was investigated.

In a total of thirty THA procedures, a standard manual technique was compared with an automated impaction device. Three computerized cognitive tasks (Simon, pattern comparison, and pursuit rotor) and five physical tests (isometric wall-sit, plank-to-fatigue, handgrip, supra-postural task, and shoulder endurance) were used to assess psychophysiological load of the surgeon. Surgeon's cortisol concentration was evaluated from saliva samples. Postural risk was assessed by Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Efficiency was assessed by timing surgical steps and instrumentation flow.

Cognitive performances after automated impaction showed faster response times and lower error rates with a greater time-on-target (+1.5 s) and a lower mouse deviation from target (−1.7 pixels). Manual impaction showed higher physical exhaustion in the isometric wall-sit test (10.6% vs. 22.9%), plank-to-fatigue (2.2% vs. 43.8%), the number of taps in the supra-postural task (−0.7% vs. −7.7%), handgrip force production in the dominant (−6.7% vs. −12.7%) and contralateral hand (+4.7% vs. +7.7%), and in shoulder endurance (−15s vs. −56s). An increase of 38.2% in salivary cortisol concentration between the midday (1.31 nmol/l) and afternoon session (1.81 nmol/l) was observed with manual impaction. After using automated impaction, salivary cortisol concentration decreased (−51.2%). Manual broaching time was on average 6′20’’ versus 7’3’’ with automated impaction. RULA of manual impaction scored 6 for cup impaction and 5 for femoral broaching, versus 3 and 3 for automated impaction, respectively. REBA of manual impaction scored 9 for cup impaction and 5 for femoral broaching, versus 4 and 3 for automated impaction, respectively.

Automated impaction lowers surgeons’ cognitive and physical fatigue and leads to reduced stress and improved ergonomics without loss of surgical efficiency.

Psoas tendinopathy is a potential cause of groin pain after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The direct anterior approach (DAA) is becoming increasingly popular as the standard approach for primary THA due to being a muscle preserving technique. It is unclear what the prevalence is for the development of psoas-related pain after DAA THA, how this can influence patient reported outcome, and which risk factors can be identified.

This retrospective case control study of prospectively recorded data evaluated 1784 patients who underwent 2087 primary DAA THA procedures between January 2017 and September 2019. Psoas tendinopathy was defined as (1) persistence of groin pain after DAA THA and was triggered by active hip flexion, (2) exclusion of other causes such as dislocation, infection, implant loosening or (occult) fractures, and (3) a positive response to an image-guided injection with xylocaine and steroid into the psoas tendon sheath. Complication-, re-operation rates, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were measured.

Forty-three patients (45 hips; 2.2%) were diagnosed with psoas tendinopathy according to the above-described criteria. The mean age of patients who developed psoas tendinopathy was 50.8±11.7 years, which was significantly lower than the mean age of patients without psoas pain (62.4±12.7y; p<0.001). Patients with primary hip osteoarthritis were significantly less likely to develop psoas tendinopathy (14/1207; 1.2%) in comparison to patients with secondary hip osteoarthritis to dysplasia (18/501; 3.6%) (p<0.001) or FAI (12/305; 3.9%) (p<0.001). Patients with psoas tendinopathy had significantly lower PROM scores at 6 weeks and 1 year follow-up.

Psoas tendinopathy was present in 2.2% after DAA THA. Younger age and secondary osteoarthritis due to dysplasia or FAI were risk factors for the development of psoas tendinopathy. Post-operatively, patients with psoas tendinopathy often also presented with low back pain and lateral trochanteric pain. Psoas tendinopathy had an important influence on the evolution of PROM scores.

Aims

Optimal exposure through the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) conducted on a regular operating theatre table is achieved with a standardized capsular releasing sequence in which the anterior capsule can be preserved or resected. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes and implant positioning would not be different in case a capsular sparing (CS) technique would be compared to capsular resection (CR).

INTRODUCTION

Quality monitoring is increasingly important to support and assure sustainability of the Orthopaedic practice. Many surgeons in a non-academic setting lack the resources to accurately monitor quality of care. Widespread use of electronic medical records (EMR) provides easier access to medical information and facilitates its analysis. However, manual review of EMRs is inefficient and costly. Artificial Intelligence (AI) software has allowed for development of automated search algorithms for extracting relevant complications from EMRs. We questioned whether an AI supported algorithm could be used to provide accurate feedback on the quality of care following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) in a high-volume, non-academic setting.

INTRODUCTION

The capsular releasing sequence is crucial to safely conduct the Direct Anterior Approach for THA on a regular OR table. The release of the anterior capsule is the first step of the releasing sequence and allows for optimal exposure. This can be done by either resecting a part of the anterior capsule or by preserving it. Our zero hypothesis was that clinical outcomes would not be different between both techniques.

Several studies have shown that gait kinematics[1–3] and hip contact forces (HCFs)[4, 5] of patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA) do not return to normal, although improvements in kinematics are found compared to the pre-surgery. However, the evolution of HCFs after surgery has not been investigated. The goal of this study is to evaluate HCFs during gait in OA patients before and at 2 evaluation moments post-THA.

Fourteen unilateral hip OA patients before and 3- and 12-months post-THA surgery walked at self-selected speed, as well as 18 healthy control subjects. 3D marker trajectories were captured using Vicon (Oxford Metrics, UK) and force data was measured using two AMTI force platforms (Watertown, MA). A musculoskeletal model consisting of 14 segments, 19 degrees of freedom and 88 musculotendon actuators and including wrapping surfaces around the hip joint was used[6]. All analyses were performed in OpenSim 3.1[7]. The model was scaled to the dimensions of each subject using the marker positions of a static pose. A kalman smoother procedure was used to calculate joint angles[8]. Muscle forces were calculated using static optimization, minimizing the sum of squared muscle activations. HCFs were calculated and normalized to body weight (BW). First and second peak HCFs were determined and used for statistical analysis. To determine differences between HCFs of OA patients at the different evaluation moments, a Friedman test was used. In case of a significant difference, post-hoc rank-based multiple comparison tests with a Bonferonni adjustment was used. To compare controls and patients at each evaluation moment separate Man-Whitney U tests were used. Differences in HCFs between the affected and non-affected legs were expressed by a symmetry index (SI), i.e. the ratio between the HCFs of the affected leg over the non-affected leg, averaged over the stance phase of the gait cycle.

At the first and second HCF peaks, no significant differences were found between pre-, 3- and 12-months post-surgery (first peak average HCF: 2.68, 2.72 and 2.78BW respectively; second peak average HCF: 3.21, 3.83 and 3.77BW respectively). Compared to controls, significant differences are found for all evaluation moments at the first and second HCF peaks (average HCF controls: 3.43 and 5.15BW respectively). The SI was below 1 pre- and 3-months post-surgery (0.88 and 0.85 respectively), indicating decreased loading of the affected compared to the non-affected leg. At 12-months post-surgery SI was close to 1 (0.98).

As reported before[4, 5], first or second peak HCFs do not return to normal after THA. Although HCFs increase after THA compared to pre-surgery, significant differences with controls remain. Surprisingly, no significant differences are found between the different evaluation moments of the patients, indicating no clear improvements are found after THA. Further, average HCF peaks at 3- and 12-months post-surgery are similar, indicating no further improvements are found 3-months post-surgery. However, the SI was above or close to 1 at 12-months post-surgery, indicating hip loading evolved to a more symmetrical loading 12-months post-surgery.

A soft-tissue defect over an infected total knee replacement (TKR) presents a difficult technical problem that can be treated with a gastrocnemius flap, which is rotated over the defect during the first-stage of a revision procedure. This facilitates wound healing and the safe introduction of a prosthesis at the second stage. We describe the outcome at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1 to 10) in 24 patients with an infected TKR who underwent this procedure. A total of 22 (92%) eventually obtained a satisfactory result. The mean Knee Society score improved from 53 pre-operatively to 103 at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index and Short-Form 12 score also improved significantly (p < 0.001).

This form of treatment can be used reliably and safely to treat many of these complex cases where control of infection, retention of the components and acceptable functional recovery are the primary goals.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1217–21.

The 3D interplay between femoral component placement on contact stresses and range of motion of hip resurfacing was investigated with a hip model. Pre- and post-operative contours of the bone geometry and the gluteus medius were obtained from grey-value CT-segmentations. The joint contact forces and stresses were simulated for variations in component placement during a normal gait. The effect of component placement on range of motion was determined with a collision model. The contact forces were not increased with optimal component placement due to the compensatory effect of the medialisation of the center of rotation. However, the total range of motion decreased by 33%. Accumulative displacements of the femoral and acetabular center of rotation could increase the contact stresses between 5–24%. Inclining and anteverting the socket further increased the contact stresses between 6–11%. Increased socket inclination and anteversion in combination with shortening of the neck were associated with extremely high contact stresses. The effect of femoral offset restoration on range of motion was significantly higher than the effect of socket positioning. In conclusion, displacement of the femoral center of rotation in the lateral direction is at least as important for failure of hip resurfacings as socket malpositioning.

Introduction

Ectopic ossification (EO) at the acetabular rim has been suggested to be associated with pincer impingement and to lead to ossification of the labrum. However, this has never been substantiated with histological, radiographic and MRI findings in large cohorts of patients. We hypothesized that it is more a bone apposition of the acetabular rim and that it occurs more frequently in coxa profunda (CP) hips.

Summary sentence

The bowing of the femur defines a curvature plane to which the proximal and distal femoral anatomic landmarks have a predictable interrelationship. This plane can be a helpful adjunct for computer navigation to define the pre-operative, non-diseased anatomy of the femur and more particularly the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

We report the outcome at a minimum of 10 years follow-up for 80 polished tapered stems performed in 53 patients less than 35-years-old with a high risk profile for aseptic loosening. Forty-six prosthesis were inserted for inflammatory hip arthritis and 34 for avascular necrosis. The mean age at surgery was 28 years in the inflammatory arthritis (17–35) and 27 years in the avascular necrosis (15–35) patients. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 years in the inflammatory arthritis group and 14 years in the avascular necrosis group respectively, survivorship of the 80 stems with revision of the femoral component for any reason as an endpoint was 100 % (95 % CI). Re-operation was because of failure of four metal-backed cups, 3 all polyethylene cups and one cementless cup. None of the stems were radiographically loose. All but two femoral components subsided within the cement mantle to a mean of 1.2 mm (0 tot 2.5) at final follow-up. Periarticular osteolysis was noted in 4 femurs in zone 7. This finding was associated with polyethylene wear and was only seen in those hips that needed revision for a metal backed cup loosening. Our findings show that the polished tapered stem has excellent medium-term results when implanted in young patients with high risk factors for aseptic loosening.

The Exeter stem is a polished cemented stem that has been associated with an excellent survivorship. However, this wedge shaped stem has also been associated with a relative higher risk for a peri-periprosthetic fracture due to the wedge-shaped configuration that can lead to a Vancouver type B2 fracture when the stem is being driven downwards inside the femoral canal by a traumatic blast. Traditionally, these fractures should be treated with a revision stem because the stem has become loosened in the fractured cement mantle. We present a case series of 5 cases where our treatment algorithm was to first let the non-displaced fracture to consolidate by 6 weeks of limited weight bearing as tolerated in order to conduct a second stage in-cement revision. This would simplify the revision procedure dramatically. However, all patients are currently pain free and do not require revision surgery although they are being monitored very closely.

We conclude that non-displaced Vancouver type B2 fractures can be approached by a 2 stage treatment algorithm where the initial step is to let the fracture consolidate with limited weight bearing.

Introduction

It was the purpose to evaluate the biomechanical changes that occur after optimal and non-optimal component placement of a hip resurfacing (SRA) by using a subject specific musculoskeletal model based on CT-scan data.

Purpose: Precise biomechanical reconstruction of the hip joint by a hip arthroplasty is essential for the success of this procedure. With the increasing use of surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA), there is a need for better understanding of the key factors that influence the anatomical and the biomechanical parameters of the resurfaced hip joint. The goal of this study was to examine the influence of SRA on the vertical and horizontal offset of the hip.

Method: Twenty-one hips from 12 embalmed cadavers were resurfaced with a Birmingham Hip resurfacing. The thickness of the acetabular bone was measured pre- and post-reaming in 6 acetabular zones. Radiographs were taken before and after the procedure with a scaling marker. For statistical analysis, the paired Student’s T-test with a confidence interval of 95% and a significant p-value of p< 0.05 was used.

Results: The mean acetabular bone loss was 3.8 mm, 5.9 mm, 9.3 mm, 10.6 mm, 8.5 mm and 3.6 mm in zones 1 to 6. The “polar length loss” is the cumulative displacement of the femoral and the acetabular articulating surface in zones 2 to 5. This displacement indicates a shortening of the neck plus a medio-cranial displacement of the acetabular articulating surface and was 4.3 mm, 7.5 mm, 9.4 mm and 7.7 mm (zone 2–5). The radiographic center of rotation (COR) was significantly medialised (mean 6.2 mm) and displaced in the cranial direction (mean 6.9 mm) (p< 0.00001). The mean total (femoral plus acetabular) horizontal and vertical offset change was 6.4 mm and 9.5 mm respectively (p< 0.00001). There was a significantly higher vertical offset change in the acetabulum than in the femur (p=0.0006). This resulted in a significantly larger change in vertical than in horizontal offset (p=0,04).

Conclusion: The displacement of the acetabular COR was responsible for 60% of the total vertical and 99% of the total horizontal offset change. The femoral side did not compensate for this displacement. SRA did not restore the biomechanics of the native hip.

Purpose: Plate and cable alone constructs to treat periprosthetic fractures around a well-fixed femoral stem in total hip replacements, have been reported with high failure rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of our surgical treatment algorithm to reliably use lateral plate and cable constructs in these fractures.

Method: One hundred and six periprosthetic fractures in 102 patients were treated between 1996 and 2006. Forty-five fractures were pre-operatively assessed as Vancouver type B1 fractures. The joint was always dislocated and stability of the implant was meticulously evaluated. This led to the identification of nine (20%) unstable stems leaving 36 fractures to be real B1-type fractures. The fracture was considered to be suitable for lateral plate and cable alone fixation if the medial cortex was not comminuted and an anatomical reduction of the medial cortex could be achieved. Twenty-nine B1- and 5 C-type fractures had been treated with a single lateral plate and cable construct. The mean length of follow-up was 43.2 months. The paired Student’s T-test with a confidence interval of 95% and a significant p-value of p< 0.05 was used to compare the pre- and postoperative UCLA hip scores.

Results: Four (12%) patients died within one month from surgery leaving 30 patients for follow-up. Twenty-nine fractures united at a mean of 6.4 months. One B1-type construct failed due to inappropriate proximal fixation. Two fractures united uneventfully with a mean of 8° of varus alignment of the proximal fragment. One patient with a C-type fracture sustained a fracture distal to the tip of the plate. There were three plate infections (8.8%). There was no significant difference between the pre- and post-operative UCLA hip scores (25 versus 23 resp.).

Conclusion: These fractures represent a difficult problem with a high complication rate of 30%. The presented treatment algorithm contributed significantly to the 97% union rate with plate and cable alone constructs that was comparable to the union rates achieved with combined plate and strut graft fixation.

Purpose: A randomised controlled trial comparing fixation of a Mallory-Head prosthesis for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with and without cement was performed with average 19 years (range 17–21 years) of continuous follow-up.

Method: Two hundred and fifty patients were randomised to undergo THA using either a Mallory-Head THA prosthesis designed to be inserted with cement or one designed for cementless insertion. Both patients and those involved in outcome assessment were blinded to the type of implantation. Patients were followed yearly after the first post-operative year for outcomes including mortality, revision arthroplasty, and health-related quality of life assessment scores.

Results: Primary THA was performed with cement in 124 patients and without cement in 126 patients. Mean age at the time of surgery was 64 years, and 48% were female. During the period of review, there were 78 (31%) deaths in the cohort, and 75 (30%) patients underwent revision surgery. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed significantly increased revision rates in cemented compared with cementless THA using failure of either component (p=0.01) or femoral component (p< 0.001) as endpoints. Although acetabular failure accounted for most revisions overall, no significant difference between groups was noted (p=0.075). With the exception of cost to quality adjusted life years, all quality of life outcome measures improved post-operatively and, although reducing modestly through the period of review, demonstrated no difference between groups at final follow-up.

Conclusion: This study has demonstrated a concerning high revision rate with both cemented and cementless THA in patients with a mean age of 64 years at the time of surgery, which significantly affected cost effectiveness. With the implants studied, cementless femoral fixation was superior to cemented, with no cementless femoral component failures through the duration of this study. This study demonstrates the importance of post-market surveillance and evidence-based improvements in THA design (i.e., bearing couples and fixation).

Summary Sentence: Cementless solid tri-spiked titanium shells, with a polished inner surface and improved locking mechanism, demonstrated excellent fixation and survivorship at mid-term (minimum 5 years) follow-up.

Introduction: The tri-spiked Reflection cup (Smith & Nephew, Memphis) is a second-generation solid titanium shell with a polished inner surface, no screw holes and an improved locking mechanism. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the minimum 5-year clinical & radiographic results and survivorship of this second-generation acetabular component.

Methods: Between 1997 and 2003, 659 primary THA were performed using the Reflection tri-spiked socket. None of the shells had adjuvant fixation with screws. The mean follow-up time was 7.0 years (5 to 11 yrs). The patients were followed prospectively using validated clinical outcome scores (WOMAC, SF-12, Harris Hip scores) and yearly radiographs.

Results: Twenty-seven patients had died before the minimum 5-year follow-up period. The mean Harris Hip and WOMAC scores were 89 and 79 respectively at last follow-up. Three sockets (0.6%) had been revised: two for infection, one for component malpositioning. No cup was revised for aseptic loosening. Six liners were exchanged: three for residual instability, 3 for wear associated with aseptic loosening of the stem. Radiographic review of remaining cups in-situ identified no cases of loosening and only a small number of cups (< 3%) with any osteolysis. The KM survivorship analysis with revision for any reason, was 97.5% and 97.4% at 5 and 10 years, while survivorship of the acetabular component was 99.8% at 5 and 10 years.

Conclusions: This second-generation cementless solid tri-spiked titanium shell, with a polished inner surface and improved locking mechanism, demonstrated excellent fixation and survivorship at mid-term follow-up.

Aim: Component positioning may be adversely affected by minimally invasive approach in total hip replacement due to restricted visualization. Problems with proper alignement are suggested to concern anteversion more than inclination and occur particulary in the lateral position.

Method: 53 patients were enrolled prospectively randomised to each group. First group (standard group, n= 30pts) underwent conventional total hip replacement in supine position and transgluteal approach and second group (MIS group, n= 23pts) underwent THR using minimally invasive anterior approach in lateral decubitus position Every group was operated on by two experienced senior surgeons. Desired cup position was 40°–45°inclination and 15–20° anteversion for the MIS group and 45°inclination and 15 ° anteversion for standard group. Postoperatively all patients had pelvic CT scan. Inclination and anteversion were determined by an independent observer using a 3-D model and planning software, the operative definition was used according to Murray.

Results: Mean inclination/anteversion in the MIS group was 39°(26°–50°)/25°(10°–47°), and 44°(29°–57°)/22°(1°–53°) within the standard group. Standard deviation for inclination was 7° for both groups, and 10° (MIS group) vs 14° (standard group) for anteversion.

The difference in the mean values regarding inclination was greater than would be expected by chance; there was a statistically significant difference (P = 0,010).

Discussion: In general cup positioning in both groups was less steep and more anteverted as presumed. The standard deviation for inclination was the same in both groups, but the standard deviation for anteversion was less in MIS group, that means less outliers regarding anteversion. Cup positioning in minimally invasive total hip replacement is safe compared to traditional approach.

Navigation technique was discussed to equalize the drawback of MIS. However, tools like imageless navigation may further improve the cup position even in traditional approach.

Introduction: The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) is the most commonly used hip resurfacing for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. The goal of this study was to evaluate how the surgeon could influence the biomechanical features of the navigated and non-navigated resurfaced proximal femur. METHODS 20 Cadaver hips were resurfaced with a BHR using femoral navigation. The native anteversion and neck shaft angle as indicated by the navigation system were used as a reference. The non-navigated femoral component jig was first placed in the “ideal” position aiming for 10° of valgus and neutral anteversion. The jig was then displaced 5mm in 4 directions. The anteversion and stem shaft angle (SSA) angle were measured for each position using the navigation system. A scaled XR was taken pre- and post-operatively. For statistical analysis, the paired Student’s T-test with a confidence interval of 95% and a significant p-value of p< 0.05 was used.

Results: The centre of rotation (COR) of the navigated resurfaced femur was 3,5 mm significantly (p=0,0006) more distal in the femoral neck than the native COR. This resulted in a 2.1 mm vertical caudal drop (vertical offset) and an average 2.7 mm lateral displacement of the COR (horizontal offset). The same measurements were done with 5° increments of the SSA from 120° to 140°. The vertical offset loss increased non-significantly (1.7 to 2.6 mm). The horizontal offset loss decreased non-significantly (3 to 2.2 mm). The native vertical and horizontal offset could be restored if 5 mm less bone was taken off the femur. The offset loss was significantly increased if 5 mm more bone than the normal reaming had been taken off (p< 0.0001). The “ideal” jig position on the lateral femoral cortex led to an average 137° SSA. Five millimetres of jig displacement on the lateral cortex in either direction did not lead to significant changes in the SSA or anteversion angles relative to the “ideal” position (all p> 0,13). Five millimetres of posterior displacement resulted in an average 139° SSA and 5,8° of anteversion in 95% of hips.

Conclusion: Surgical interventions can significantly change the biomechanics of the hip. Increasing the SSA with a fixed femoral head entry point, as often is done with navigation, does not significantly change the femoral offset. If the surgeon decides to take less bone off the femur, then the offset could be restored and even increased to 1 mm more than the native femur. If due to pathologic changes the bone loss would be increased to 5mm more than the “normal” bone loss, a significant offset loss of > 5 mm could be expected which might lead to detrimental biomechanical effects. The positioning of the jig is subject to surgical errors. The effect of a 5 mm error in either direction does not lead to significant changes in anteversion or SSA. Posterior displacement led to the most reproducible component positioning.