Proximal inter-phalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis is a commonly performed procedure as a part of hammer and claw-toe correction. Conventional K-wire stabilisation has the potential disadvantages of infection; violation of DIP joint; external protrusion or the wire and necessity of removal.

Newer intra-medullary stabilisation devices are also available, though tend to incur addition costs. We present our technique and results of using a single, buried 1.6 mm K-wire for proximal inter-phalangeal joint fusion

Our objectives were to assess union rates and patient satisfaction following intra-medullary K wires for PIP joint fusion. This involved reviewing 26 consecutive patients (34 toes) who had undergone hammer or claw toe correction. Case notes and radiographs were reviewed to establish results and complications and the need for revision surgery. Initial Radiographs taken at 6 weeks and a telephone survey was undertaken to assess patient satisfaction (16–44 weeks).

Our findings were that of the twenty-one women and five men underwent surgery, with a mean age of 59 years (24–77), stable union was achieved in 33 of 36 toes. No patients had superficial or deep infection and no patient required wire removal or a revision procedure.

In conclusion, PIPJ Arthrodesis with buried K Wires has excellent clinical outcome and high patient satisfaction.

Introduction:

PREMS and PROMS are part of the national initiative of the DoH. They measure quality from patient perspective and also help patient choice. We present our pioneering experience of PROMS 2.0 which is a semi automated web based system to collect and analyse outcome data in real time.

Component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reason for early failure and revision. Assessment of possible component malrotation using computed tomography (CT) might be useful when other differentials have been excluded. The aims of our study were to determine the proportion of symptomatic patients with component malrotation on CT, and review the subsequent management of such patients.

A retrospective review of case notes was performed locally for all patients who had a CT scan for a painful TKA. Measurements of the femoral and tibial component rotations were done according to the standard Berger protocol, giving net degrees of either external rotation (ER) or internal rotation (IR). Any subsequent surgery was noted, and patients were followed up as per local practice.

Between 2007 and April 2012, 69 knees in 68 patients had CT scans. There were 25 males and 43 females, and mean age at primary surgery was 65.03 years. The mean femoral component rotation for all knees was 0.1° ER (range 7.0° ER – 6.7° IR), and the mean tibial component rotation for all knees was 19.1° IR (6.6° ER – 37.0° IR). No statistically significant difference was found comparing the mean femoral and tibial component rotations between patients with and without further surgery. Further surgery was performed on 39 (56.5%) knees.

Overall, there were ten cases (14.5%) of isolated femoral malrotation, 26 tibial malrotation (37.7%), and two cases (2.9%) had malrotation of both components. Out of these 38 cases, secondary surgery was performed in 22 knees (57.9%), of which a satisfactory outcome was achieved in fifteen cases (68.1%).

It is impossible to establish component malrotation as the only cause of pain following TKA, however, our study does show that the Berger protocol has its uses when other causes have been excluded.

There is a legal and ethical obligation to gain informed consent before treatment commences. A number of bodies have issued guidelines for obtaining consent and these include the Department of Health, the GMC, The Royal College Surgeons of England, and the B.O.A. For a patient to give their informed consent to surgery they must receive sufficient information about their illness, proposed treatment and its prognosis. There are no specific guidelines regarding joint replacement. With this in mind a retrospective case note study was undertaken involving 100 patients who had undergone a hip replacement. Noting the documented discussion at all stages of patient contact.Fifty percent of patients had been seen and listed in the Outpatients by a Consultant, 25% were discussed with the Consultant responsible and the remainder were listed without Consultant input. In only 33 % of cases were any specific risks recorded. This had fallen to 4% on their visit to pre operative assessment clinic. All the consent forms were completed at the time of admission for surgery. Forty percent of these on the day of surgery. The majority were completed by SHOs (58%), while only 4% were completed by consultants. None of the forms noted the lead surgeon. All the consent forms noted some frequently occurring risks. However there was a large variance in the details recorded. The study highlights that the majority of complications are only documented on the consent form, with little note of the dialogue leading up to it. It is also apparent that there is no agreement as to what represents a significant or frequent complication.

This review raises a number of important issues. There needs to be a national standardisation of the process of consent. We propose the introduction of a specific consent form for hip replacements that provide improved documentation of the standardised risks involved. This should also include guidelines regarding prosthesis choice, surgical approach and the extent of trainee involvement. In addition we would also suggest there is a need to improve sequential documented discussion up to the point of surgery and introduce specific training for juniors carrying out consent.