Periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of primary total hip replacement (THR) with significant associated morbidity. In acute infection, Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) may be considered. Current national guidelines recommend a DAIR should be performed by “an experienced arthroplasty surgeon┕ but do not specify the need for this to be a revision arthroplasty surgeon. We investigated outcomes in our NHS Trust of DAIR procedures performed by revision and non-revision arthroplasty surgeons. Infection registry data and patient records were analysed for all DAIR procedures of infected primary THRs between 2017 and 2021. Data collected included details of the primary surgery, the presentation with infection, the DAIR procedure and any subsequent complications including return to theatre at any time point. Routinely collected pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were reviewed. 54 periprosthetic joint infections of primary THRs received a DAIR procedure. 41 DAIRs were performed by a revision surgeon and 13 by non-revision surgeons. There was no significant difference in time from primary THR to presentation with infection, time from presentation to DAIR or pre-operative C-reactive protein between the two groups. In 21 (38.9%) patients the DAIR procedure was classed as a treatment failure; 17 patients (31.5%) returned to theatre for further revision surgery, one (2.4%) died related to infection and three (5.6%) had persistent infection but did not receive further surgery. Treatment failure was significantly higher in the non-revision surgeon group (9/13 (69.2%)) than in the revision surgeon group (12/41 (29.3%)) (p = 0.02). Overall, improvement in PROMs after DAIR was seen at both six and 12 months. The overall success rate of DAIR was 61.1% and there was a sustained improvement in PROMs after surgery. However, there was a significant difference in failure rates between revision surgeons and non-revision surgeons.
National BOAST guidelines have been developed to coordinate and improve the standard of care for all patients with problems after knee replacement surgery. Since the inception of these guidelines we wanted to assess the impact of these guidelines on patients and their pathways following their discussions at our weekly revision MDT meetings. Trust casenotes programs, PACS software and MDT notes were evaluated over the past 12 months (January 2022 to December 2022) to collect data for all patients with problematic knee replacements. Current in-patients discussed at MDT were excluded.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
In metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements or resurfacings, mechanical induced corrosion can lead to a local inflammatory response, pseudo tumours and elevated serum metal ions, requiring revision surgery. The size and diametral clearance of Anatomic (ADM) and Modular (MDM) Dual Mobility bearings matches that of certain MOM components. Presenting the opportunity for revision with exchange of the metal head for ADM/MDM bearings without removal of the acetabular component if it is well-fixed and appropriately positioned. Between 2012 and 2020, across two centres, 94 patients underwent revision of a MoM hip replacement or resurfacing. The mean age was 65.5 (33–87) years. In 53 patients (56.4%), the acetabular component was retained, and dual mobility bearings were used (DM); in 41 (43.6%) the acetabulum was revised (AR). DM was only considered where the acetabular component was satisfactorily positioned and well-integrated into bone, with no surface damage. Patients underwent clinical and radiographic follow-up to at least one-year (mean 42.4 (12–96) months). One (1.1%) patient died before one-year, for reasons unrelated to the surgery. In the DM group, two (3.8%) patients underwent further surgery; one (1.9%) for dislocation and one (1.9%) for infection. In the AR group, four (12.2%) underwent further procedures; two (4.9%) for loosening of the acetabular component and two (4.9%) following dislocations. There were no other dislocations in either group. In the DM group, operative time (68.4 v 101.5 mins, p<0.001), postoperative drop in haemoglobin (16.6 v 27.8 g/L, p<0.001), and length of stay (1.8 v 2.4 days, p<0.001) were significantly lower. There was a significant reduction in serum metal ions postoperatively in both groups (p<0.001 both Cobalt and Chromium) although there was no difference between groups for this reduction (p=0.674 Cobalt; p=0.186 Chromium). In selected patients with MoM hip arthroplasty, where the acetabular component is well-fixed, in a satisfactory position and there is no surface damage, the metal head can be exchanged for ADM/MDM bearings with retention of the acetabular prosthesis. Presenting significant benefits through a less invasive procedure, and a low risk of complications, including dislocation.
Femoral cement-in-cement revision is a well described technique to reduce morbidity and complications in hip revision surgery. Traditional techniques for septic revision necessitate removal of all bone cement from the femur. In our two institutions, we have been using a cement-in-cement technique, leaving the distal femoral cement in selected cases for septic hip revision surgery. Between February 2010 and September 2019, 89 patients with prosthetic hip infection underwent first or single stage procedures leaving the distal femoral cement in situ and performing a cement-in-cement revision. The mean patient age was 72.0 years (24–92). The median time from the last arthroplasty procedure was 29.0 months (1–294). 81 patients underwent revision using a cemented Exeter stem, 7 patients received an articulating spacer, and one patient underwent excision arthroplasty with the distal cement left in situ. Patients received clinical and radiographic follow-up with a mean of 42.8 months (range 11.0–120.1 months). Oxford hip scores were collected from each institution's existing databases. 9 patients (10.1%) died within one year of surgery. No deaths were directly related to joint infection or the surgery. One patient was lost to follow up before one year. Of the remainder, 7 patients (8.9%) required further procedures for infection and were therefore considered to be treatment failures. 6 patients (7.6%) underwent planned second stage procedures with no recurrence of infection. 7 patients (8.9%) had further surgery for non-infective reasons. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of infection free survival at one year was 93.7% (95% CI 88.4 to 99.0%). No patients underwent revision for stem loosening. Oxford hip scores were available at over one year postoperatively for 51 patients with a mean score of 30.6, and a mean gain of 11.9. In our combined cohort of patients, cement-in-cement revision had an infection eradication rate of 91.1%. Patient selection is crucial, and the procedure can only be performed when there is a well-fixed cement mantle. However, when strict criteria are followed, this technique offers potential significant benefits to surgeons performing this challenging surgery, and more importantly the patients undergoing them.
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication of surgery
with an incidence of about 1% in the United Kingdom. Sutures can
lead to the development of a SSI, as micro-organisms can colonize
the suture as it is implanted. Triclosan-coated sutures, being antimicrobical,
were developed to reduce the rate of SSI. Our aim was to assess
whether triclosan-coated sutures cause a reduction in SSIs following
arthroplasty of the hip and knee. This two-arm, parallel, double-blinded study involved 2546 patients
undergoing elective total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty
(TKA) at three hospitals. A total of 1323 were quasi-randomized
to a standard suture group, and 1223 being quasi-randomized to the
triclosan-coated suture group. The primary endpoint was the rate
of SSI at 30 days postoperatively.Aims
Patients and Methods
A fracture of the hip is the most common serious orthopaedic
injury, and surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most significant
complications, resulting in increased mortality, prolonged hospital
stay and often the need for further surgery. Our aim was to determine
whether high dose dual antibiotic impregnated bone cement decreases the
rate of infection. A quasi-randomised study of 848 patients with an intracapsular
fracture of the hip was conducted in one large teaching hospital
on two sites. All were treated with a hemiarthroplasty. A total
of 448 patients received low dose single-antibiotic impregnated
cement (control group) and 400 patients received high dose dual-antibiotic impregnated
cement (intervention group). The primary outcome measure was deep
SSI at one year after surgery.Aims
Patients and Methods
Dislocation is a major complication post total hip replacement (THR) and a common cause for revision. Jameson et al (2012) studied 35,000 cemented Exeter (Stryker) THRs demonstrating the risk of revision was significantly influenced by the acetabular component design. This led 3 surgeons in a single hospital group to make a mass move from using the hooded Exeter Low Profile (LP) cup to the better performing Contemporary Flanged (CF) component. The purpose of this study was to show whether this change was associated with a fall in dislocation rates. Locally held National Joint Registry data between 2010 and 2015 was used to ascertain implants used in all primary THRs by 3 experienced high volume surgeons. This was linked to local Hospital Episode Statistics to identify patients who had undergone closed or open reduction of a dislocated hip replacement in theatre.INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS/MATERIALS & METHODS
Deep infection is a potentially catastrophic complication of joint replacement surgery. Early intervention in suspected prosthetic joint infection in the form of aggressive Debridement and targeted Antibiotics can lead to successful Implant Retention (DAIR). In our centre, we adopt an aggressive approach to suspected prosthetic joint infection, working in a multi-disciplinary team with microbiologists and an infection surveillance team to identify and treat suspected infected cases at the earliest opportunity. To evaluate the efficacy of the treatment of prosthetic joint infection with DAIR.INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
We investigated the capacity of patient warming
devices to disrupt the ultra-clean airflow system. We compared the effects
of two patient warming technologies, forced-air and conductive fabric,
on operating theatre ventilation during simulated hip replacement
and lumbar spinal procedures using a mannequin as a patient. Infection
data were reviewed to determine whether joint infection rates were
associated with the type of patient warming device that was used. Neutral-buoyancy detergent bubbles were released adjacent to
the mannequin’s head and at floor level to assess the movement of
non-sterile air into the clean airflow over the surgical site. During
simulated hip replacement, bubble counts over the surgical site
were greater for forced-air than for conductive fabric warming when
the anaesthesia/surgery drape was laid down (p = 0.010) and at half-height
(p <
0.001). For lumbar surgery, forced-air warming generated
convection currents that mobilised floor air into the surgical site
area. Conductive fabric warming had no such effect. A significant increase in deep joint infection, as demonstrated
by an elevated infection odds ratio (3.8, p = 0.024), was identified
during a period when forced-air warming was used compared to a period
when conductive fabric warming was used. Air-free warming is, therefore,
recommended over forced-air warming for orthopaedic procedures.
There have been no large comparative studies of the blood levels of metal ions after implantation of commercially available hip resurfacing devices which have taken into account the effects of femoral size and inclination and anteversion of the acetabular component. We present the results in 90 patients with unilateral articular surface replacement (ASR) hip resurfacings (mean time to blood sampling 26 months) and 70 patients with unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implants (mean time 47 months). The whole blood and serum chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) concentrations were inversely related to the size of the femoral component in both groups (p <
0.05). Cr and Co were more strongly influenced by the position of the acetabular component in the case of the ASR, with an increase in metal ions observed at inclinations >
45° and anteversion angles of <
10° and >
20°. These levels were only increased in the BHR group when the acetabular component was implanted with an inclination >
55°. A significant relationship was identified between the anteversion of the BHR acetabular component and the levels of Cr and Co (p <
0.05 for Co), with an increase observed at anteversion angles <
10° and >
20°. The median whole blood and serum Cr concentrations of the male ASR patients were significantly lower than those of the BHR men (p <
0.001). This indicates that reduced diametral clearance may equate to a reduction in metal ion concentrations in larger joints with satisfactory orientation of the acetabular component.
Hip dysplasia in cerebral palsy (CP) poses technical challenges because of the need to produce large corrections in the face of soft tissue contractures, and extreme distortion of the femur and acetabulum. In addition to adductor and flexor lengthenings, bony surgery may be required in the older child. We have developed an inter-trochanteric shortening osteotomy which allows a major varus realignment without resulting in an adducted leg. Medial displacement of the lower femoral shaft is carried out. The osteotomy is fixed using a Richards Intermediate Hip Screw, whose lag screw and barrel are inserted into the upper face of the osteotomy (not through the lateral cortex as in the standard technique). The plate is attached to the femur below in the normal way. The plate is not prominent laterally because of the medial displacement. We have performed 37 such osteotomies in 29 patients.19 were male, 18 were female. Age range 3–12 years, mean 8 years. Mean time since operation 5.8 years. Additional procedures were carried out in 16 patients. The mean neck shaft angle pre-operatively was 159 degrees, post-operatively it was 118 degrees. The mean change was 41 degrees. The mean migration percentage pre-operatively was 56.8%, post-operatively it was 15.7%. The mean change was 41.1%. We found the technique to be easier, more stable, and obtained better correction screw did not seem to be a problem, we think because the osteotomy is above the than conventional femoral osteotomy. Rotation of the upper segment around the psoas attachment, and psoas is released.
The operation of Keller’s arthroplasty for hallux valgus associated with arthritis appears to have fallen from favour. It is pertinent therefore to review the long-term results in patients treated by one consultant orthopaedic surgeon using a standardised technique. We were able to locate 30 patients (47 feet). Four were male and 26 female, and the age at surgery was 20–74 years (mean 65). Follow-up was from 7–22 years (mean 13). All patients were recalled for clinical evaluation, recording history of symptoms in the feet, need for further surgery, and presence of deformity. Clinical rating on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score for the hallux was determined. Pedobarographs (Musgrave) were recorded and radiographs taken of symptomatic feet. 27 patients (43 feet) were either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome of surgery. The mean AOFAS score was 80 (range 49–100). Three patients (4 feet) were dissatisfied because of floppy toe (1), or elevated toe with metatarsalgia (2). Pedobarograph and radiographic findings will be presented. We found Keller’s arthroplasty to be a reliable procedure in the management of hallux valgus associated with arthritis. Satisfactory results in the long term were obtained in 90% of patients. We believe attention to detail in the performance of the procedure to be important. We would like to acknowledge that patients studied in this review were treated under the care of Mr GD Stainsby.
We report the medium term results using an extensively porous coated cementless femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty in 129 cases. 166 femoral revisions were performed using the Solution cementless stem between 1991 and 1997 in 4 hospitals within our region. 30 patients had died and 7 were lost to follow up leaving 122 patients ( 129 hips ) available for assessment. All were independently reviewed, questioned about thigh pain, and scored using the Charnley modification of the Postel-D’Aubigne Hip Score. Post operative complications and need for further surgery were noted. Radiographs were assessed to identify component subsidence, osteolysis and stress shielding. At mean 5 year follow up (range 2–8 yrs), 9 stems (7%) had been revised and a further 4 stems (3%) were subsiding. Of the remaining components, 8 stems (7%) showed fibrous union and 108 stems (92%) bone ingrowth. Mild to moderate stress shielding was common but did not seem to affect fixation. Our findings indicate that satisfactory medium term stability can be achieved using diaphyseal fixation in the mechanically or biologically proximally deficient femur. Failure due to subsidence occurs due to undersizing, occurs early and progresses.
