Recent studies have shown that bone mineral distribution is more heterogeneous in bone tissue from an animal model of osteoporosis and osteoporotic human vertebral trabeculae. These tissue alterations may play a role in bone fragility seen in osteoporosis, albeit that they are not detectable by current diagnostic techniques (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA). Type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) also increases a patient's fracture risk beyond what can be explained or diagnosed by DXA, and is associated with impaired bone cell function, compromised collagen structure and reduced mechanical properties. However, it is not currently known whether osteoporosis or T2DM leads to an increased mineral heterogeneity in the femoral head of humans, a common osteoporotic fracture site. In this study, we examine bone microarchitecture, mineralisation and mechanical properties of trabecular bone from osteoarthritic, diabetic and osteoporotic patients. We report that while osteoporotic trabecular bone has significantly deteriorated mechanical properties and microarchitecture compared to the other groups, there is also a significant increase in mean mineral content. Moreover, the heterogeneity of the mineral content in osteoporotic bone is significantly higher than osteoarthritic (+35%) and diabetic (+13%) groups. We propose that the compromised architecture following bone loss at the onset of osteoporosis alters the mechanical environment, which initiates compensatory changes in mineral content. We show for the first time that trabecular bone mineralisation is significantly more heterogeneous (+20%) in T2DM compared to osteoarthritic controls. Interestingly, bone microarchitecture and mechanical properties are not significantly different between diabetic and osteoarthritic groups despite this increase in mineral heterogeneity.

Musculoskeletal diseases are leading causes of disability, morbidity and economic loss across the globe today. Yet for much of the world's population access to cheap, safe and effective intervention is lacking, while others choose not to accept best practice and best evidence, or significantly more expensive treatment. Great advances have been made in some diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, but the cost of many new treatments is unaffordable, and individuals, insurance and governments struggle to, or cannot fund it. Anchor bias and politics determines national policies and research funding, often favouring other illnesses while musculoskeletal disorders lack the support proportional to their frequency and impact. This is not appreciated by policy makers and governments, and the consequences of lack of care or poor-quality care. The need has never been greater for a treatment for osteoarthritis, the most common disease in the world; but the search for a cure needs funding, and if discovered, who will pay for it?