The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of anterior knee pain after antegrade tibial nailing using suprapatellar and infrapatellar surgical approaches A total of 95 patients with a tibial fracture requiring an intramedullary nail were randomized to treatment using a supra- or infrapatellar approach. Anterior knee pain was assessed at four and six months, and one year postoperatively, using the Aberdeen Weightbearing Test – Knee (AWT-K) score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain. The AWT-K is an objective patient-reported outcome measure that uses weight transmitted through the knee when kneeling as a surrogate for anterior knee pain.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of post-operative anterior knee discomfort after anterograde tibial nailing by suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches. 95 subjects presenting with a tibial fracture requiring an intramedullary nail were randomised to treatment using a suprapatellar (SP) or infrapatellar (IP) approach. Anterior knee discomfort was assessed at 4 months, 6 months and 1 year post operatively using the Aberdeen Weightbearing Test-Knee (AWT-K), knee specific patient reported outcome measures and the VAS pain score. The AWT-K is an objective measure which uses weight transmitted through the knee when kneeling as a surrogate for anterior knee discomfort. 53 patients were randomised to an SP approach and 42 to an IP approach. AWT-K results showed a greater mean proportion of weight transmitted through the injured leg compared to the uninjured leg when kneeling in the SP group compared to the IP group at all time points at all follow-up visits. This reached significance at 4 months for all time points except 30 seconds. It also reached significance at 6 months at 0 seconds and 1 year at 60 seconds. We conclude that the SP approach for anterograde tibial nailing reduces anterior knee discomfort post operatively compared to the IP approach.
