header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 439 - 439
1 Aug 2008
Dubousset J Charpak G Skali W Kaifa G
Full Access

Introduction: We believe the information given by a new 2D/3D low dose radiation system is useful to the spinal surgeon.

Method: This commercially developed system was evaluated over the past three years. We evaluated 150 patients, with normal controls, using two prototypes. We compared it with a CT scan for accuracy in 2D and 3D reconstruction and for radiation doses.

Results: We found various advantages of this system over CT scanning:

Reductions in radiation exposure of x8 to x10 fold in 2D, and x800 to x1000 in 3D.

It gives data from standing imaging compared with supine in a CT scanner.

It allows imaging of the skeleton from head to foot, which in CT imaging demands excessive radiation.

It allows surface reconstruction from head to foot

It can be used with a force plate to indicate gravity forces

It, uniquely, can give a view of the skeleton from the top

It can measure thoracic cage volume

It can assess the effects of bracing

When combined with other non-invasive methods of measurement, can help to define operative procedures

Overall it provides a new approach to assessing spinal deformity both in the horizontal plane and in volumetric measurement.

Conclusion: his innovative method is clearly a help for both patients and surgeons.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 253 - 253
1 Jul 2008
DUBOUSSET J CHARPAK G DORION R LAVASTE F SKALLI W DEGUISE J KALIFA G FEREY S
Full Access

Purpose of the study: The objective of this work was to achieve a whole-body 3D study of the bone and joint system in the upright position using the lowest radiation dose possible. Radiation doses can be considerable when acquiring 3D images using computed tomographic millimetric sections which in addition are acquired uniquely in the reclining position and thus limited to a specific region.

Material and methods: Using a gas detector which transforms x-ray protons into electrons (G. Charpak) we constructed a device which enables acquisition of high-quality anteroposterior and lateral whole-body radiographic images with exposure to radiation doses 8 to 10-fold less than classical 2D x-rays. A 3D reconstruction of the entire skeleton was obtained from these two initial images.

Results: The 3D reconstructions were validated and compared with those obtained with computed tomography. The results were concordant and revealed least equivalent to if not better reliability. The advantage was to enable study in the functional upright position an to study weight-bearing joints of the lower-limbs, pelvis, and spine. In addition, radiation exposure for the 3D reconstructions was reduced 800 to 1000 times compared with computed tomography. More than 150 examinations have been performed and validated in patients with diverse pathological conditions as well as in normal control adults and children.

Discussion: There is a very wide potential field of application for this technique in orthopedics, both for 3D analysis of joint deformations and their impact on the whole body, and for therapeutic follow-up, particularly after prosthetic or corrective surgery. For example, the horizontal plane which is very difficult to image and represent mentally for spinal surgery can be clearly planned and controlled. This new imaging technique offers perspectives for intraoperative navigation and for bone mineral density measurements. The double-energy methodology enables short-term evaluation of fracture risk due to osteoporosis of the spine and limbs or pelvis.