We present the ten-year data of a cohort of patients, aged between
18 and 65 years (mean age 52.7 years; 19 to 64), who underwent total
hip arthroplasty. Patients were randomised to be treated with a
cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral head with an ultra-high molecular weight
polyethylene (UHMWPE), highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) or
ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing surface. A total of 102 hips (91 patients) were randomised into the three
groups. At ten years, 97 hips were available for radiological and
functional follow-up. Two hips (two patients) had been revised (one
with deep infection and one for periprosthetic fracture) and three
were lost to follow-up. Radiological analysis was performed using
a validated digital assessment programme to give linear, directional
and volumetric wear of the two polyethylene groups.Aims
Patients and Methods
The ideal bearing surface for young patients
undergoing total hip replacement (THR) remains controversial. We report
the five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing
the clinical and radiological outcomes of 102 THRs in 91 patients
who were <
65 years of age. These patients were randomised to
receive a cobalt–chrome on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene,
cobalt–chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene, or a ceramic-on-ceramic
bearing. In all, 97 hip replacements in 87 patients were available
for review at five years. Two hips had been revised, one for infection
and one for peri-prosthetic fracture. At the final follow-up there were no significant differences
between the groups for the mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
osteoarthritis index (pain, p = 0.543; function, p = 0.10; stiffness,
p = 0.99), Short Form-12 (physical component, p = 0.878; mental
component, p = 0.818) or Harris hip scores (p = 0.22). Radiological
outcomes revealed no significant wear in the ceramic group. Comparison of standard and highly cross-linked polyethylene,
however, revealed an almost threefold difference in the mean annual
linear wear rates (0.151 mm/year
