The aim of this randomised controlled study was to compare functional and radiological outcomes between modern cemented and uncemented hydroxyapatite coated stems after one year in patients treated surgically for a fracture of the femoral neck. A total of 141 patients aged > 65 years were included. Patients were randomised to be treated with a cemented Exeter stem or an uncemented Bimetric stem. The patients were reviewed at four and 12 months.

The cemented group performed better than the uncemented group for the Harris hip score (78 vs 70.7, p = 0.004) at four months and for the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assesment Questionnaire dysfunction score at four (29.8 vs 39.2, p = 0.007) and 12 months (22.3 vs 34.9, p = 0.001). The mean EQ-5D index score was better in the cemented group at four (0.68 vs 0.53, p = 0.001) and 12 months (0.75 vs 0.58, p = < 0.001) follow-up. There were nine intra-operative fractures in the uncemented group and none in the cemented group.

In conclusion, our data do not support the use of an uncemented hydroxyapatite coated stem for the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck in the elderly.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1475–80.

Introduction: The treatment for the active and lucid elderly patient with a displaced femoral neck fracture is still controversial. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that a primary total hip replacement (THR) is superior to internal fixation (IF) regarding the need for secondary surgery, hip function, and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Despite the good results with THR in this patient group, a vast majority of orthopaedic surgeons prefer hemiarthroplasty (HA) before THR. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome regarding hip function and HRQoL after a displaced femoral neck fracture in a active and lucid elderly patient randomized to either a bipolar HA or THR.

Patients and Methods: 120 patients (101 females), mean age 81 (range 70 – 90), with an acute displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden III and IV) were randomized to bipolar HA or THR. Perioperative data, hip complications, general complications, hip function (Harris Hip Score, HHS) and HRQoL (EQ-5D) were assessed. The patients were summoned at 4 and 12 months.

Results: The duration of surgery was longer in the THR group, 102 versus 78 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was higher, 460 ml versus 320 ml. There were no differences between the groups regarding hip complications and general complications including mortality. There were no dislocations. Hip function (HHS score) was significantly better in the THR group at both follow-ups, p< 0.05 and < 0.001, respectively, with a trend towards an increasing difference with time. The HRQoL (EQ-5D index score) were in favor of the THR group although not statistically significant.

Discussion: The results of this study indicate that a THR gives better hip function compared to a bipolar HA already after one year without increasing the complication rate. There are good reasons to assume that this difference will increase with time. We recommend THR as the primary treatment for the active and lucid elderly patient with a displaced femoral neck fracture.

The best treatment for the active and lucid elderly patient with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck is still controversial. Randomised controlled trials have shown that a primary total hip replacement is superior to internal fixation as regards the need for secondary surgery, hip function and health-related quality of life. Despite good results achieved with total hip replacement in this group, most orthopaedic surgeons still advocate hemiarthroplasty for this injury. We studied 120 patients with a mean age of 81 years (70 to 90) with an acute displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. They were randomly allocated to be treated with either a bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. Outcome measurements included peri-operative data, general and hip-specific complications, hip function and health-related quality of life. The patients were reviewed at four and 12 months.

The duration of surgery was longer in the total hip replacement group (102 minutes (70 to 151)) versus 78 minutes (43 to 131) (p < 0.001), and the intra-operative blood loss was increased 460 ml (100 to 1100) versus 320 ml (50 to 850) (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between the groups regarding any complications or mortality. There were no dislocations in either group. Hip function measured by the Harris hip score was significantly better in the total hip replacement group at both follow-up periods (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001, respectively). The health-related quality of life measure was in favour of the total hip replacement group but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.818 at four months and p = 0.636 at 12 months).

These results indicate that a total hip replacement provides better function than a bipolar hemiarthroplasty as soon as one year post-operatively, without increasing the complication rate. We recommend total hip replacement as the primary treatment for this group of patients.

We studied 60 patients with an acute displaced fracture of the femoral neck and with a mean age of 84 years. They were randomly allocated to treatment by either internal fixation with cannulated screws or hemiarthroplasty using an uncemented Austin Moore prosthesis. All patients had severe cognitive impairment, but all were able to walk independently before the fracture. They were reviewed at four, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Outcome assessments included complications, revision surgery, the status of activities of daily living (ADL), hip function according to the Charnley score and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) according to the Euroqol (EQ-5D) (proxy report).

General complications and the rate of mortality at two years (42%) did not differ between the groups. The rate of hip complications was 30% in the internal fixation group and 23% in the hemiarthroplasty group; this was not significant. There was a trend towards an increased number of re-operated patients in the internal fixation group compared with the hemiarthroplasty group, 33% and 13%, respectively (p = 0.067), but the total number of surgical procedures which were required did not differ between the groups. Of the survivors at two years, 54% were totally dependent in ADL functions and 60% were bedridden or wheelchair-bound regardless of the surgical procedure. There was a trend towards decreased mobility in the hemiarthroplasty group (p = 0.066). All patients had a very low HRQOL even before the fracture. The EQ-5D_index score was significantly worse in the hemiarthroplasty group compared with the internal fixation group at the final follow-up (p < 0.001).

In our opinion, there is little to recommend hemiarthroplasty with an uncemented Austin Moore prosthesis compared with internal fixation, in patients with severe cognitive dysfunction.