Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is theoretically more accurate for component positioning than TKA performed with mechanical instruments (M-TKA). Furthermore, the ability to incorporate soft-tissue laxity data into the plan prior to bone resection should reduce variability between the planned polyethylene thickness and the final implanted polyethylene. The purpose of this study was to compare accuracy to plan for component positioning and precision, as demonstrated by deviation from plan for polyethylene insert thickness in measured-resection RA-TKA versus M-TKA. A total of 220 consecutive primary TKAs between May 2016 and November 2018, performed by a single surgeon, were reviewed. Planned coronal plane component alignment and overall limb alignment were all 0° to the mechanical axis; tibial posterior slope was 2°; and polyethylene thickness was 9 mm. For RA-TKA, individual component position was adjusted to assist gap-balancing but planned coronal plane alignment for the femoral and tibial components and overall limb alignment remained 0 ± 3°; planned tibial posterior slope was 1.5°. Mean deviations from plan for each parameter were compared between groups for positioning and size and outliers were assessed.Aims
Methods
Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is theoretically more accurate for component positioning than TKA performed with mechanical instruments (M-TKA). Furthermore, the ability to quantify soft tissue laxity and adjust the plan prior to bone resection should reduce variability in polyethylene thickness. This study was performed to compare accuracy to plan for component positioning and polyethylene thickness in RA-TKA versus M-TKA. 199 consecutive primary TKAs (96 C-TKA and 103 RA-TKA) performed by a single surgeon were reviewed. Full-length standing and knee radiographs were obtained pre and post-operatively. For M-TKA, measured resection technique was used. Planned coronal plane femoral and tibial component alignment, and overall limb alignment were all 0° to the mechanical axis; tibial posterior slope was 2°; and polyethylene thickness was 9mm. For RA-TKA, individual component position was adjusted to assist balance the gaps but planned coronal plane alignment for the femoral and tibial components and overall limb alignment had to remain 0+/− 3°; planned tibial posterior slope was 1.5°. Planned values and polyethylene thickness for RA-TKA were obtained from the final intra-operative plan. Mean deviations from plan for each parameter were compared between groups (ΔFemur, ΔTibia, ΔPS, and polyethylene thickness) as were distal femoral recut and tourniquet time.Introduction
Methods
Pelvic discontinuity is a challenging complication. One treatment option that has garnered enthusiasm is acetabular distraction. This method obtains stability via distraction of the discontinuity and placement of an oversized socket (± augments) and elastic recoil of the pelvis. The aims of this study were to report implant survivorship, radiographic results, clinical outcomes, and complications of acetabular distraction for pelvic discontinuity in the largest series to date. We retrospectively identified all revision THAs with a Paprosky 3B defect and pelvic discontinuity between 2005 and 2017. Of the 162 patients, 32 were treated with distraction. The mean distraction achieved was 5mm (range, 3–8mm). In addition to distraction with a hemispherical cup, augments were utilized in 3 and cages in 19. The mean age at revision was 68 years with 75% female. Mean follow-up was 3 years.Introduction
Methods
