header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 52 - 52
1 Mar 2008
Dubberley J Faber K MacDermid J Patterson S Romano W Garvin G Bennett J King G
Full Access

The reliability and accuracy of plain radiographs, MRI and CT Arthrography to detect the presence of loose bodies was evaluated in twenty-six patients with mechanical elbow symptoms. The location of loose bodies found by the imaging studies was compared to arthroscopic findings. Overall sensitivity for the detection of loose bodies was 88 – 100% and specificity was 20 – 70%. Plain radiographs had a similar sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 71% respectively. MRI and CT Arthrography were similar to plain radiography, suggesting that routine use of these modalities is not indicated.

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of MRI and CT Arthrography (CTA) to reliably and accurately predict the presence of loose bodies in the elbow.

Twenty-six patients with mechanical elbow symptoms underwent plain radiography, MRI and CTA, followed by standard elbow arthroscopy. Three musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed the ‘blinded’ plain radiographs with both the MRI and CTA at separate sittings. The location and number of loose bodies on the MRI and CTA were recorded. The preoperative plain radiographs, MRI and CTA were compared to the arthroscopic findings.

Agreement between radiologists was higher for the number of loose bodies identified in the posterior compartment (ICC=0.72 for both MRI and CTA) than in the anterior compartment (ICC=0.41 and 0.52 for MRI and CTA respectively). The correlation between the number of lose bodies observed on MRI and CTA compared to those found arthroscopically was also higher in the posterior compartment (r=0.54–0.85) than in the anterior compartment (r=0.01–0.45). Both MRI and CTA had excellent sensitivity (92–100%) but moderate to low specificity (15–77%) in identifying posteriorly located loose bodies. Neither MRI nor CTA were consistently sensitive (46–91%) or specific (13–73%) in predicting anterior loose bodies. Overall sensitivity for the detection of loose bodies in either compartment was 88–100% and specificity was 20–70%. The preoperative radiographs had a similar sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 71% respectively.

MRI and CTA were similar to plain radiography in the prediction of elbow loose bodies.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 5 | Pages 684 - 686
1 May 2005
Dubberley JH Faber KJ Patterson SD Garvin G Bennett J Romano W MacDermid JC King GJW

Our aim was to determine the clinical value of MRI and CT arthrography in predicting the presence of loose bodies in the elbow.

A series of 26 patients with mechanical symptoms in the elbow had plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography, followed by routine arthroscopy of the elbow. The location and number of loose bodies determined by MRI and CT arthrography were recorded. Pre-operative plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography were compared with arthroscopy.

Both MRI and CT arthrography had excellent sensitivity (92% to 100%) but low to moderate specificity (15% to 77%) in identifying posteriorly-based loose bodies. Neither MRI nor CT arthrography was consistently sensitive (46% to 91%) or specific (13% to 73%) in predicting the presence or absence of loose bodies anteriorly. The overall sensitivity for the detection of loose bodies in either compartment was 88% to 100% and the specificity 20% to 70%. Pre-operative radiography had a similar sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 71%, respectively.

Our results suggest that neither CT arthrography nor MRI is reliable or accurate enough to be any more effective than plain radiography alone in patients presenting with mechanical symptoms in the elbow.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 73-B, Issue 2 | Pages 225 - 228
1 Mar 1991
Bennett J Mazurek R Cash J

Seventeen patients, with an average age of nine years 11 months, underwent 18 Chiari osteotomies for the treatment of painful subluxation of the hips following Perthes' disease. The average follow-up period was four years three months. The 13 patients reviewed clinically all did well and none complained of pain or instability. The radiographs were examined in all 17 cases. The average centre-edge angle and percentage femoral head cover were definitely improved by the operation. No significant medical displacement of the femoral head was achieved. The clinical success may result from improved femoral head coverage and diminished eccentricity. Chiari's osteotomy is recommended for adolescent patients with painful subluxation of the hip as a consequence of Perthes' disease.