The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution of phenotypes in Asian patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and assess whether the phenotype affected the clinical outcome and survival of mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We also compared the survival of the group in which the phenotype unintentionally remained unchanged with those in which it was corrected to neutral. The study involved 945 TKAs, which were performed in 641 patients with primary OA, between January 2000 and January 2009. These were classified into 12 phenotypes based on the combined assessment of four categories of the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and three categories of actual joint line obliquity. The rates of survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test. The Hospital for Special Surgery score and survival of each phenotype were compared with those of the reference phenotype with neutral alignment and a parallel joint line. We also compared long-term survival between the unchanged phenotype group and the corrected to neutral alignment-parallel joint line group in patients with Type IV-b (mild to moderate varus alignment-parallel joint line) phenotype.Aims
Methods
Ultrasound (US)-guided injections are widely used in patients with conditions of the shoulder in order to improve their accuracy. However, the clinical efficacy of US-guided injections compared with blind injections remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of US-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint in patients with primary frozen shoulder (FS). Intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered to 90 patients primary FS, who were randomly assigned to either an US-guided (n = 45) or a blind technique (n = 45), by a shoulder specialist. Immediately after injection, fluoroscopic images were obtained to assess the accuracy of the injection. The outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and range of movement (ROM) for all patients at the time of presentation and at three, six, and 12 weeks after injection.Aims
Methods
Two-stage revision with the removal of all prosthesis has been considered to be the gold standard for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. However, removal of well-fixed femoral stem is technically challenging and may cause excessive bone loss. The aim of this study was to compare the results between retention and removal of femoral stem when performing two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. From 2007 to 2014, ninety-four patients with infection after hip arthroplasty were treated by using two-stage exchange protocol with temporary articulating spacers. Among them, 38 patients completed the planned second stage reimplantation. Stem was exchanged in 15 patients (group I) and retained in 23 patients (group II). We retrospectively investigated the clinical and radiographic results after an average 39.9 months follow upPurpose
Materials & Methods
Thermal injury to the radial nerve caused by cement leakage is a rare complication after revision elbow arthroplasty. Several reports have described nerve palsy caused by cement leakage after hip arthroplasty. However, little information is available regarding whether radial nerve injury due to cement leakage after humeral stem revision will recover. In a recent study, radial nerve palsy occurred in 2 of 7 patients who had thermal injury from leaked cement during humeral component revisions. These patients did not regain function of the radial nerve after observation. We present a case of functional recovery from a radial nerve palsy caused by cement leakage after immediate nerve decompression in revision elbow arthroplasty[Fig. 1.2].
It is still unclear whether it is best, when revision surgery is required for replacement of an acetabular component, to treat femoral focal osteolysis with bone-grafting or instead to leave it untreated because the defect is too small and uncontained; the concern is to prevent bone graft from escaping into the hip joint. We hypothesized that progression of osteolysis can halted if the cause of particulate generation is removed and the femoral component is well osseointegrated. We prospectively followed 21 patients (24 hips) who underwent acetabular revision and curetting of proximal femoral osteolysis. These patients were followed for the minimum 3 years (mean, 4.3 years; range, 3–7.4 years). At the time of the latest follow-up examination, all hips were judged to be stable and to have well-fixed acetabular cups and femoral stems. No hips had significant progression of the osteolytic defect through the follow-up period and none demonstrated any new osteolytic lesion. Provided that a femoral component is bone ingrown with osseointegration sufficient to provide long-term stability, that the osteolytic defect is in the proximal aspect of the femur, and that the defect is uncontained, simple curettage is an effective alternative to additional bone-grafting.
The rate of failure of primary THA in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head is higher than that in patients who undergo THA because of other diagnoses. We examined the results of cementless THA performed with second-generation in a consecutive series of young patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Sixty-five consecutive primary THAs with insertion of a femoral stem with a circumferential proximal porous coating (HG Multilock prosthesis) and a cementless acetabular component (Harris-Galante II) were performed in 52 patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. These patients were followed prospectively and evaluated at a minimum of 10 years after surgery. Four patients (4 hips) died and three patients (3 hips) were lost to follow-up monitoring. The remaining 45 patients (58 hips) had a mean of 11.1 years (range, 10 to 13.4 years) of clinical and radiographic follow-up. One stem (1.7%) was revised because of aseptic loosening. Eighteen cups (31%) were revised because of excessive polyethylene wear and osteolysis. One hip (1.7%) underwent revision of both acetabular and femoral component because of excessive polyethylene wear and osteolysis. The mean Harrsi Hip Score improved from 49 points before surgery to 92.8 points after surgery in patients who did not undergo reoperation. Osteolysis around the acetabular component was present in 22 hips (37.9%). Femoral osteolysis was seen in 9 hips (15.5%), and there was no osteolysis below the lesser trochanter in any hip. Circumferentially porous-coated second-generation femoral prostheses provide excellent fixation in young patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. However, a high rate of polyethylene wear and osteolysis in these high-risk patients remains a challenging problem.
