We present a comparison of patient-reported outcomes
(PROMs) in relation to patient age, in patients who had received
a total (TKR) or unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The outcome
was evaluated using the Oxford knee score (OKS), EuroQol (EQ-5D)
and satisfaction scores. Patients aged 65 to 84 years demonstrated
better pre-operative function scores than those aged <
65 years
(OKS, p = 0.03; EQ-5D, p = 0.048) and those aged
≥ 85 years (OKS, p = 0.03). Post-operative scores were comparable
across age groups, but a linear trend for greater post-operative
improvement in OKS and EQ-5D was seen with decreasing age (p <
0.033). The overall mean satisfaction score at six months was 84.9,
but those aged <
55 years exhibited a lower mean level of satisfaction (78.3)
compared with all other age groups (all p <
0.031). The cumulative
overall two-year revision rate was 1.3%. This study demonstrates
that good early outcomes, as measured by the OKS and EQ-5D, can
be anticipated following knee replacement regardless of the patient’s
age, although younger patients gain greater improvement. However,
the lower satisfaction in those aged
<
55 years is a concern, and suggests that outcome is not fully
encapsulated by the OKS and EQ-5D evaluation, and raises the question
whether the OKS alone is an appropriate measure of pain and function
in younger, more active individuals. Cite this article:
