header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Apr 2022
Anarat FB Balcı HI Bayram S Eralp L Kocaoglu M Sen C
Full Access

Introduction

The effect of lower extremity lengthening on physeal growth is still controversial. We aim to compare data of the patients who had bilateral simultaneous femur and tibia lengthening with the patients who underwent the lengthening surgery separately for the femur and tibia at the end of completed skeletal maturation in terms of the effect of physeal growth.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-six patients were included who operated in our clinic between 1995 and 2015 for limb lengthening. Fourteen patients with bilateral lengthening of the femur and tibia at the same time were named as simultaneous lengthening (SL). Twelve patients with bilateral lengthening of the femur and then bilateral tibia lengthening seperately were named consecutively lengthening (CL). All patients were followed until completion of growth. The physeal arrest was measured using predicted length (investigated with the multiplier method), the total amount of lengthening and final length.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 23 - 23
1 Apr 2022
Balci HI Anarat FB Kocaoglu M Eralp L Sen C Bas A
Full Access

Introduction

This study aims to evaluate the effect of using different types of fixator on the quality of callus and complications during distraction osteogenesis in patients with achondroplasia.

Materials and Methods

Forty-nine achondroplasia patients with a minimum follow-up of 36 months who underwent limb lengthening between 2005 and 2017 with external fixator only were included. Thirty-three of the patients underwent lengthening using classical Ilizarov frame, while spatial frame used for sixteen. Regenerate quality is evaluated according to the Li classification on the X-ray taken one month after the end of the distraction. Complications were noted in the follow-up period.