header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1351 - 1355
1 Oct 2012
Collins RA Walmsley PJ Amin AK Brenkel IJ Clayton RAE

A total of 445 consecutive primary total knee replacements (TKRs) were followed up prospectively at six and 18 months and three, six and nine years. Patients were divided into two groups: non-obese (body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). The obese group was subdivided into mildly obese (BMI 30 to 35 kg/m2) and highly obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) in order to determine the effects of increasing obesity on outcome. The clinical data analysed included the Knee Society score, peri-operative complications and implant survival. There was no difference in the overall complication rates or implant survival between the two groups.

Obesity appears to have a small but significant adverse effect on clinical outcome, with highly obese patients showing lower function scores than non-obese patients. However, significant improvements in outcome are sustained in all groups nine years after TKR. Given the substantial, sustainable relief of symptoms after TKR and the low peri-operative complication and revision rates in these two groups, we have found no reason to limit access to TKR in obese patients.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1321 - 1326
1 Oct 2006
Amin AK Clayton RAE Patton JT Gaston M Cook RE Brenkel IJ

The results of 41 consecutive total knee replacements performed on morbidly obese patients with a body mass index > 40 kg/m2, were compared with a matched group of 41 similar procedures carried out in non-obese patients (body mass index < 30 kg/m2). The groups were matched for age, gender, diagnosis, type of prosthesis, laterality and pre-operative Knee Society Score. We prospectively followed up the patients for a mean of 38.5 months (6 to 66). No patients were lost to follow-up. At less than four years after operation, the results were worse in the morbidly obese group compared with the non-obese, as demonstrated by inferior Knee Society Scores (mean knee score 85.7 and 90.5 respectively, p = 0.08; mean function score 75.6 and 83.4, p = 0.01), a higher incidence of radiolucent lines on post-operative radiographs (29% and 7%, respectively, p = 0.02), a higher rate of complications (32% and 0%, respectively, p = 0.001) and inferior survivorship using revision and pain as end-points (72.3% and 97.6%, respectively, p = 0.02).

Patients with a body mass index > 40 kg/m2 should be advised to lose weight prior to total knee replacement and to maintain weight reduction. They should also be counselled regarding the inferior results which may occur if they do not lose weight before surgery.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 3 | Pages 335 - 340
1 Mar 2006
Amin AK Patton JT Cook RE Brenkel IJ

A total of 370 consecutive primary total knee replacements performed for osteoarthritis were followed up prospectively at 6, 18, 36 and 60 months. The Knee Society score and complications (perioperative mortality, superficial and deep wound infection, deep-vein thrombosis and revision rate) were recorded. By dividing the study sample into subgroups based on the body mass index overall, the body mass index in female patients and the absolute body-weight. The outcome in obese and non-obese patients was compared. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed no difference in the Knee Society score between the subgroups. There was no statistically-significant difference in the complication rates for the subgroups studied. Obesity did not influence the clinical outcome five years after total knee replacement.