header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 82 - 82
1 Aug 2020
Addar A Hamdy RC Fassier F Jiang F Marwan Y Algarni N Montpetit K
Full Access

The use of intramedullary implants in Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) patients to treat and prevent fractures, non-unions and limb deformities has been well established. To serve this purpose different implants are available from non-telescoping rods such as Rush rods and Kirschner wires, to telescoping rods such as the Dubow-Bailey rod, the Sheffield rod and the Fassier-Duval (FD) rod (Pega Medical, Laval, Quebec, Canada). The purpose of this study is to report on the long-term results of the femoral Fassier-Duval rod.

A retrospective chart review of all patients with OI who underwent a femoral intramedullary Fassier-Duval rodding between 2002 and 2017 and followed for an average of 12 years at the Shriner's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada was performed.

A total of 81 patients underwent femoral FD rodding between 2002 and 2017. Twenty-seven children undergoing 83 procedures had completed a minimum 10-year follow up with complete charts and these were included here. The average follow up time was 12 years (10–15 years). Fifty procedures were initial rodding surgeries and 30 (36.1%) were revision surgeries. A total of 69 complications were reported in the medical record and confirmed on x-ray. The 3 most common complications were a bent rod 24 (34.8%), femur fracture 16 (23.2%) and loss of telescoping in 12 (17.4%) of patients. The 3 most common cause of revision were femur fracture 16 (53.3%), broken rod 5 (16.7%) and coxa vara in 3 (10%) of patients. The average time from initial surgery to the first revision was 5.9 years.

Long term performance of femoral FD rodding shows that despite improved functioning with these rods, certain complications are to be expected, most commonly a risk of femoral fracture requiring revision surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 78 - 78
1 Aug 2020
Marwan Y Martineau PA Kulkarni S Addar A Algarni N Tamimi I Boily M
Full Access

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) is considered as an important stabilizer of the knee joint. This ligament prevents anterolateral subluxation of the proximal tibia on the femur when the knee is flexed and internally rotated. Injury of the ALL was not investigated in patients with knee dislocation. The aim of the current research is to study the prevalence and characteristics of ALL injury in dislocated knees.

A retrospective review of charts and radiological images was done for patients who underwent multiligamentous knee reconstruction surgery for knee dislocation in our institution from May 2008 to December 2016. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to describe the ALL injury. The association of ALL injury with other variables related to the injury and the patient's background features was examined.

Forty-eight patients (49 knees) were included. The mean age of the patients was 32.3 ± 10.6 years. High energy trauma was the mechanism of dislocation in 28 (57.1%) knees. Thirty-one knees (63.3%) were classified as knee dislocation (KD) type IV. Forty-five (91.8%) knees had a complete ALL injury and three (6.1%) knees had incomplete ALL injury. Forty (81.6%) knees had a complete ALL injury at the proximal fibres of the ALL, while 23 (46.9%) knees had complete distal ALL injury. None of the 46 (93.9%) knees with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injury had normal proximal ALL fibres (p = 0.012). Injury to the distal fibres of the ALL, as well as overall ALL injury, were not associated with any other variables (p >0.05). Moreover, all patients with associated tibial plateau fractures (9, 18.4%) had abnormality of the proximal fibres of the ALL (p = 0.033).

High grade ALL injury is highly prevalent among dislocated knees. The outcomes of reconstructing the ALL in multiligamentous knee reconstruction surgery should be investigated in future studies.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 7 | Pages 341 - 350
1 Jul 2020
Marwan Y Cohen D Alotaibi M Addar A Bernstein M Hamdy R

Aims

To systematically review the outcomes and complications of cosmetic stature lengthening.

Methods

PubMed and Embase were searched on 10 November 2019 by three reviewers independently, and all relevant studies in English published up to that date were considered based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. The search was done using “cosmetic lengthening” and “stature lengthening” as key terms. The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used to screen the articles.