To compare rates of serious adverse events in patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty with consideration of the indication for revision (urgent versus elective indications), and compare these with primary arthroplasty and re-revision arthroplasty. Patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty were identified in the national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) between 1 April 1997 to 31 March 2017. Subsequent revision and re-revision arthroplasty procedures in the same patients and same knee were identified. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality and a logistic regression model was used to investigate factors associated with 90-day mortality and secondary adverse outcomes, including infection (undergoing surgery), pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Urgent indications for revision arthroplasty were defined as infection or fracture, and all other indications (e.g. loosening, instability, wear) were included in the elective indications cohort.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the long-term risk of undergoing knee arthroplasty in a cohort of patients with meniscal tears who had undergone arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). A retrospective national cohort of patients with a history of isolated APM was identified over a 20-year period. Patients with prior surgery to the same knee were excluded. The primary outcome was knee arthroplasty. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted by patient age, sex, year of APM, Charlson comorbidity index, regional deprivation, rurality, and ethnicity. Risk of arthroplasty in the index knee was compared with the patient’s contralateral knee (with Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Meniscal Consensus Project was to develop an evidence-based treatment guideline for patients with meniscal lesions of the knee. A formal consensus process was undertaken applying nominal group, Delphi, and appropriateness methods. Consensus was first reached on the terminology relating to the definition, investigation, and classification of meniscal lesions. A series of simulated clinical scenarios was then created and the appropriateness of arthroscopic meniscal surgery or nonoperative treatment in each scenario was rated by the group. The process was informed throughout by the latest published, and previously unpublished, clinical and epidemiological evidence. Scenarios were then grouped together based upon the similarity of clinical features and ratings to form the guideline for treatment. Feedback on the draft guideline was sought from the entire membership of BASK before final revisions and approval by the consensus group.Aims
Materials and Methods
Aims
Materials and Methods
We reviewed the long-term clinical and radiological
results of 63 uncemented Low Contact Stress (LCS) total knee replacements
(TKRs) in 47 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The mean age of
the patients at the time of surgery was 69 years (53 to 81). At
a mean follow-up of 22 years (20 to 25), 12 patients were alive
(17 TKRs), 27 had died (36 TKRs), and eight (ten TKRs) were lost
to follow-up. Revision was necessary in seven patients (seven TKRs, 11.1%)
at a mean of 12.1 years (0 to 19) after surgery. In the surviving
ten patients who had not undergone revision (15 TKRs), the mean
Oxford knee score was 30.2 (16 to 41) at a mean follow-up of 19.5
years (15 to 24.7) and mean active flexion was 105° (90° to 150°).
The survival rate was 88.9% at 20 years (56 of 63) and the Kaplan–Meier
survival estimate, without revision, was 80.2% (95% confidence interval
37 to 100) at 25 years. Cite this article:
