Alternative alignment concepts, including kinematic and restricted kinematic, have been introduced to help improve clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results, along with patient satisfaction, following TKA using the concept of restricted kinematic alignment. A total of 121 consecutive TKAs performed between 11 February 2018 to 11 June 2019 with preoperative varus deformity were reviewed at minimum one-year follow-up. Three knees were excluded due to severe preoperative varus deformity greater than 15°, and a further three due to requiring revision surgery, leaving 109 patients and 115 knees to undergo primary TKA using the concept of restricted kinematic alignment with advanced technology. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the preoperative limb varus deformity: Group A with 1° to 5° varus (43 knees); Group B between 6° and 10° varus (56 knees); and Group C with varus greater than 10° (16 knees). This study group was compared with a matched cohort of 115 TKAs and 115 patients using a neutral mechanical alignment target with manual instruments performed from 24 October 2016 to 14 January 2019.Aims
Methods
Mechanical axis limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated excellent long-term survivorship; however, patient satisfaction continues to demand improvement. Alternative emerging alignment concepts including kinematic and tibial constitutional varus have been introduced but remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and patient satisfaction following TKA with tibial components placed in constitutional varus alignment. This was a retrospective cohort analysis from a total joint registry of 114 patients with preoperative varus deformity who underwent primary TKA with tibial component placed in 1–3 degrees of constitutional varus. The group included 59 males (52%) and 55 (48%) females with a mean age of 67 years (range 43 – 85) and mean BMI of 32.0 kg/m2 (range 21 – 51 kg/m2) with a minimum 1 year follow-up. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the preoperative varus alignment: Group A between 1°- 5° varus (43 knees), Group B between 6°- 10° (56 knees), and Group C greater than 10° (16 knees). The target constitutional tibial varus alignment was selected based on the extent of the patient's deformity.Introduction
Methods
