1. The posterior interosseous nerve of the forearm is vulnerable to constriction in an aponeurotic cleft in the supinator muscle. 2. A case is presented of paresis of the nerve by an intramuscular lipoma which extended into this cleft. 3. A discussion is given of the possible relation of this feature to certain cases of occupational stress–"tennis elbow." 4. An approach is described for decompressing the nerve in the rare cases which do not respond to conservative treatment.
We surgeons are privileged in having a profession which also encompasses a craft; by it we should have understanding of the problems of craftsmanship in modern life. Ultimately it is at the core of human happiness. Craftsmanship is based upon creative ability, good design, the almost loving conflict of man and material, and the consequent unification of both in completion. Craftsmanship is only possible as a manifestation of individuality. Integrity and invulnerability are its outcome. May it not be that in the atomic age (if there is one outside of destruction) there may be a return to the craftsman's life of the eighteenth century; not of necessity for the maintenance of economic life, because that will be done for him by the machine, but rather for the maintenance of health?
It is clear that in lateral rhachotomy we have a procedure which is appropriate for approach to the vertebral bodies in a variety of pathological processes including, besides the relief of Pott's paraplegia, the treatment of non-paraplegic tuberculosis, the exploration of spinal tumours, the relief of certain types of traumatic paraplegia and the drainage of suppurative osteitis of the vertebral bodies. For tuberculous disease we find in lateral rhachotomy a technical procedure which provides a meeting point for the solution of several ideas. These are the evacuation of tuberculous abscesses as enunciated by Pott and developed by MeÌnard, the revascularisation of avascular areas, the removal of necrotic material and the direct removal of the features causing spinal cord compression. It is to the latter only that I think I have made a small contribution. For all other purposes, between lateral rhachotomy and the classical costo-transversectomy, the differences if any are extremely small. The fact remains that the direct surgical approach to lesions of the vertebral bodies has a wide scope of usefulness.
