header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 29 - 29
1 Feb 2014
van Hooff M O'Dowd J Spruit M de Kleuver M Fairbank J van Limbeek J
Full Access

Background

Combined physical and psychological (CPP) programmes are widely recommended for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) patients, but not often implemented. Patients with longstanding CLBP participating in a two-week CPP programme improve in functional status and quality of life and this is maintained at two-year follow up. One-year follow-up data is available of 955 participants.

Purpose:

Evaluation of one-year follow-up outcomes of a large cohort (n=848) compared to previously published results of the first 107 patients.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 3 - 3
1 Apr 2013
van Hooff ML O'Dowd J Spruit M van Limbeek J
Full Access

Background

Although the aetiology of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is unknown, it is suggested that several subgroups among CLBP-patients might be identified who are likely to benefit from different interventions. The results of these interventions might be improved by matching interventions to patient characteristics.

Purpose

The purpose of this longitudinal study is to determine which subgroup of CLBP-patients benefits most from the short, intensive pain management program of RealHealth_NL.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 489 - 489
1 Nov 2011
van Hooff M O’Dowd J Pither C de Kleuver M Pavlov P van Limbeek J
Full Access

Purpose: The long term effects of treatment in a cohort of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) participating in an intensive pain management program.

Background: Cognitive behavioral treatments produce clinically relevant benefits for patients with CLBP.

Methods: The program provided by RealHealth-Netherlands is based on cognitive behavioral principles and executed in collaboration with orthopedic surgeons. Primary outcomes were daily functioning and self-efficacy. Measurements were at baseline, last day of residential program and at 1 and 12 months follow-up. A GLM procedure with repeated measures was applied to examine changes over time and to explore possible unwanted side effects. Effect sizes are analyzed using cohen’s d. Clinical relevance was examined using minimal clinical important differences (MCID) estimates for primary outcomes and quality of life. To compare results with literature Standardized Morbidity Ratios (SMR) were determined.

Results: 107 patients with CLBP participated. Mean scores on primary and secondary outcomes showed a similar pattern: improvement immediately after following the program and maintenance of results over time. Effect sizes were 0.9 for functioning and 0.8 for self-efficacy. Clinical relevancy: 79% reached MCID on functioning, 53% on self-efficacy and 80% on quality of life. Found study results were 36% better and 2% worse when related to previous research on respectively rehabilitation programs and spinal surgery for similar conditions (SMR 136% and 98%respectively).

Conclusion: The participants of this evidence based program learned to manage CLBP, improved in daily functioning and quality of life. The study results are comparable with results of spinal surgery and even better than results from less intensive rehabilitation programs.

Conflict of Interest: None

Sources of Funding: None