The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the true operating room (OR) ventilation on the risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR). 40 orthopedic units were included during the period 2005 – 2015. The Unidirectional airflow (UDAF) systems were subdivided into small-area, low-volume, vertical UDAF (lvUDAF) (volume flow rate (VFR) (m3/hour) <=10,000 and diffuser array size (DAS) (m2) <=10); large-area, high-volume, vertical UDAF (hvUDAF) (VFR >=10,000 and DAS >=10) and Horizontal UDAF (H-UDAF). The systems were compared to conventional, turbulent ventilation (CV) systems. The association between revision due to infection and OR ventilation was assessed using Cox regression models, with adjustments for sex, age, indication for surgery, ASA-classification, method of fixation, modularity of the components, duration of surgery, in addition to year of primary THA. All included THAs received systemic, antibiotic prophylaxis.Aim
Method
A previous Dutch guideline for prophylaxis of hematogenous PJI (HPJI) caused defensive medicine and incorrect own guidelines. There was a need for a better national guideline, developed cooperatively by orthopedic surgeons and dentist. A committee of Dutch Orthopedic and Dental Society, performed a systematic literature review to answer the question: We included 9 papers as follows: RCT's and systematic reviews: 539 abstracts > 33 full papers > 1 paper included. observational studies: 289 abstracts > 12 full papers > 5 papers. reference-to-reference: 3 papers. The nine papers’ quality was scored according the GRADE method. In addition we studied in non-included literature on further information about additional questions of pathophysiology, risk factors and risk procedures.Aim
Method
Both from experimental studies and the large arthroplasty registries there is evidence that bacteria are more often involved in implant loosening then is currently reported. To further elucidate this potential problem, the current study investigated the hypothesis that many total hip arthroplasty revisions, classified as aseptic, are in fact low-grade infections missed with routine diagnostics. In 7 Dutch hospitals, 176 patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening of their total hip arthroplasty were enrolled. From each patient, the preoperative history was obtained. During surgery, between 14 and 20 tissue samples were obtained for routine culture, pathology analysis and broad range 16S rRNA PCR with reverse line blot hybridization (PCR-RLB). Samples were taken from the (neo-) capsule and acetabular and femoral interface tissue. Cultures were performed locally according to similar protocols. One specialized pathologist, blinded for all other results, analyzed all pathology samples. The PCR-RLB analysis was performed centrally, using a technique previously validated for orthopedic use. Patients were classified as not infected, suspect for infection or infected, according to strict, predefined criteria. Each patient had a follow-up visit after 1 year.Background
Methods
