Tenotomy of the iliopsoas tendon has been described as an effective procedure to treat refractive groin pain induced by iliopsoas tendinitis. However, the procedure forces the rectus femoris to act as the primary hip flexor and little is known about the long-term effects of this procedure on the peri-articular muscle envelope (PAME). Studies suggest that iliopsoas tenotomy results in atrophy of the iliopsoas and decreased hip flexion strength with poorer outcomes, increasing the susceptibility for secondary tendinopathy. The aim of this study is to describe changes in the PAME following psoas release.

All patients who presented for clinical examination at our hospital between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who presented after psoas tenotomy with groin pain and who were unable to actively lift the leg against gravity, were included. Pelvic MRI was taken. Qualitative muscle evaluation was done with the Quartile classification system. Quantitative muscle evaluation was done by establishing the cross-sectional area (CSA).

Two independent observers evaluated the ipsi- and contralateral PAME twice. The muscles were evaluated on the level: iliacus, psoas, gluteus minimus-medius-maximus, rectus femoris, tensor fasciae lata, piriformis, obturator externus and internus.

For the qualitative evaluation, the intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated by using kappastatistics. A Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability for the quantitative evaluation. The Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the changes between the ipsi- and contra-lateral side.

17 patients were included in the study. Following psoas tenotomy, CSA reduced in the ipsilateral gluteus maximus, if compared with the contralateral side. Fatty degeneration occurred in the tensor fascia latae. Both CSA reduction and fatty degeneration was seen for psoas, iliacus, gluteus minimus, piriformis, obturator externus and internus. No CSA reduction and fatty degeneration was seen for gluteus medius and rectus femoris.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) surgery is a physical and cognitive challenge for surgeons. Data on stress levels, cognitive and physical load of orthopaedic surgeons, as well as ergonomic impact, are limited. With and without the use of an automated impaction device, operational efficiency and the surgeon's ergonomic, mental, and physical load was investigated.

In a total of thirty THA procedures, a standard manual technique was compared with an automated impaction device. Three computerized cognitive tasks (Simon, pattern comparison, and pursuit rotor) and five physical tests (isometric wall-sit, plank-to-fatigue, handgrip, supra-postural task, and shoulder endurance) were used to assess psychophysiological load of the surgeon. Surgeon's cortisol concentration was evaluated from saliva samples. Postural risk was assessed by Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Efficiency was assessed by timing surgical steps and instrumentation flow.

Cognitive performances after automated impaction showed faster response times and lower error rates with a greater time-on-target (+1.5 s) and a lower mouse deviation from target (−1.7 pixels). Manual impaction showed higher physical exhaustion in the isometric wall-sit test (10.6% vs. 22.9%), plank-to-fatigue (2.2% vs. 43.8%), the number of taps in the supra-postural task (−0.7% vs. −7.7%), handgrip force production in the dominant (−6.7% vs. −12.7%) and contralateral hand (+4.7% vs. +7.7%), and in shoulder endurance (−15s vs. −56s). An increase of 38.2% in salivary cortisol concentration between the midday (1.31 nmol/l) and afternoon session (1.81 nmol/l) was observed with manual impaction. After using automated impaction, salivary cortisol concentration decreased (−51.2%). Manual broaching time was on average 6′20’’ versus 7’3’’ with automated impaction. RULA of manual impaction scored 6 for cup impaction and 5 for femoral broaching, versus 3 and 3 for automated impaction, respectively. REBA of manual impaction scored 9 for cup impaction and 5 for femoral broaching, versus 4 and 3 for automated impaction, respectively.

Automated impaction lowers surgeons’ cognitive and physical fatigue and leads to reduced stress and improved ergonomics without loss of surgical efficiency.

Aims

Optimal exposure through the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) conducted on a regular operating theatre table is achieved with a standardized capsular releasing sequence in which the anterior capsule can be preserved or resected. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes and implant positioning would not be different in case a capsular sparing (CS) technique would be compared to capsular resection (CR).

INTRODUCTION

The capsular releasing sequence is crucial to safely conduct the Direct Anterior Approach for THA on a regular OR table. The release of the anterior capsule is the first step of the releasing sequence and allows for optimal exposure. This can be done by either resecting a part of the anterior capsule or by preserving it. Our zero hypothesis was that clinical outcomes would not be different between both techniques.