Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a novel technique of anterior fixation of unstable pelvic fractures which is minimally invasive, biomechanically suitable, easy to apply, and uses readily available spinal implants.

Method: Eighteen consecutive patients with unstable pelvic fractures (AO type A-12 patients and type B-6 patients) underwent stabilization using the novel technique of fixation and were included in the study. Two trauma trained orthopedic surgeons performed all the procedures. All patients were evaluated clinically and with imaging studies that included antero-posterior, inlet and outlet radiographs and a CT scan. At surgery the posterior instability was addressed first with iliosacral screw fixation following reduction of the fracture in a standard fashion. A 2–3cm longitudinal incision was then made over the anterior inferior iliac spine bilaterally to obtain a starting point in the supra acetabular region. Pedicle screws of size 7mm or 8mm x 80mm (Synthes Spine Paoli, USA) were then placed in the supra-acetabular position under fluoroscopic guidance. A pre-contoured 6mm titanium rod with a bow was then tunneled subcutaneously to connect the screws. Care was taken to place the rod just below the lower abdominal crease to prevent pressure on the bowel or vascular structures. The implants were compressed using standard compressors and C-rings. Patients were followed until the pelvis fracture healed as documented on X-rays and clinical exam.

Results: Patients were followed for a minimum 6 months (range 6–12 mo). All patients healed by 3 months (similar to our prior experience using other methods). Complications included: 2 deaths in poly trauma patients unrelated to the pelvic procedure; 2 patients with transient lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy (one on each side), and one early implant failure due to a surgical technical error that was re-operated the next day.

Conclusion: Disruptions of the pelvic ring are complex injuries and should be managed on a case specific basis. By employing the established principles of supra-acetabular fixation, this technique allows for minimally invasive, definitive internal anterior fixation. The potential complications of pin tract infection and a cumbersome external appliance associated with external fixation are avoided with this technique and better patient acceptance is achieved.

The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of rhBMP-2 when applied to an absorbable collagen sponge for interbody fusion with allograft spacers.

Seventy-seven consecutive patients requiring inter-body fusion with one hundred and eighteen levels were included in the study. In thirty-six patients cervical or lumbar interbody fusions were performed using allograft and rhBMP-2. In the remaing allograft was used with demineralised bone matrix. In patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ALIF) machined allograft spacers were supplemented with anterior locking plates. In those scheduled for anterior lumbar inter-body fusion (ALIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), machined allograft spacers were supplemented with posterior pedicle screw constructs. There were no stand alone ALIF procedures. All patients undergoing surgery were assessed preoperatively and at two weeks, six weeks, three, six, twelve, twenty-four months following surgery.Their Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionaires, Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and a pain diagram were recorded. Radiographic measurements were made on the electronic public access computer system (EPACS).

All patients with allograft plus rhBMP-2 showed radiographic evidence of fusion by six months following surgery. The allograft with demineralised bone matrix group took considerably longer to achieve the same radiographic end plate appearance. Subsidence was obvious on radiographs in greater than 50% of cases with allograft and rhBMP-2 at three months. It was noted to occur between six weeks and three months and there was no significant subsidence after six months. This was statistically significant with a p< 0.0001 (fisher exact test). The average subsidence for the entire rhBMP-2 group at twelve months was 16.5%(SE 2.5% and range 0–58%) and for the allograft and bone matrix group was 4.6%(SE.74% range 0–15%)with a p< 0.0001 (independant t test).

Although high rates of fusion can be accomplished with allograft and rhBMP-2 (100%), significant subsidence occurs in greater than 50% of lumbar spine cases and 30% of cervical spine cases. This is possibly a result of early bone turnover with loss of structural support of the allograft spacer and end plate resorption.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and fusion rates of a unilateral pedicle screw construct supplemented with a translaminar screw in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The construct was used with an aim of providing suitable spine stiffness with minimal implant load for spinal fusion.

Nineteen consecutive patients who underwent single level TLIF were included in the study. All patients had posterior spinal instrumentation using a unilateral pedicle screw construct with a contralateral translaminar screw. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at two, six, twelve and twenty-four weeks following surgery and at the end of one and two years. At every visit Oswestry disability index score,Visual analogue scale for pain and a pain diagram were recorded. A radiographic exam was also conducted and CT scan was done if there was concern about fusion.

The average follow up was twenty-four months. There were twelve males and seven females with an average age of forty-eight years. All patients went on to clinical and radiographic union. Sixteen of nineteen patients had significant clinical improvement on VAS for pain, Oswestry scores and pain medication. Three patients had recurrence of radicular pain on the side of the TLIF leading to reexploration. In all three patients solid fusion was observed but scar tissue was evident and symptoms resolved following redecompression of the foramen.

The biomechanical competence of a construct is evidenced by successful fusion. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques to achieve spinal fusion the goal is to use minimal instrumentation without compromising on the final stiffness of the spine. The construct of unilateral pedicle screws supplemented with a trans-laminar screw led to fusion in all our cases. It requires lesser soft tissue dissection and the posterior implants are 56% cheaper.

Spinal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients can be challenging to the operating surgeon. One of the major problems is obtaining a good surgical access. We have used the synframe retractor system in patients undergoing spinal fusion and have found it especially useful in obese and morbidly obese patients. This study reports our experience.

Seventy-seven consecutive obese and morbidly obese patients that underwent spinal decompression and fusion were reviewed. Patient selection was based on BMI values. Those with a BMI of more than thirty were included in the study. There were thirty-eight females and twenty-five males with an age of twenty-one to eighty-one years. Patient charts were used to acquire information regarding age,weight,height,gender,time in surgery, procedure start and end time,and departure. Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were also recorded. Anesthesia notes were used to determine ASA scores,number of preoperative morbidities,and intraoperative blood loss. The synframe was used on all the patients. It is a retractor system which consists of a ring placed around the surgical site. It is fixed to both sides of the operating table with arms. Using retractor blades, the ring allows 360 degree access to the surgical exposure from any side.

The set up tme for obese patients was 59.8 minutes and 73.5 minutes for morbidly obese patients. The surgical time and blood loss was only marginally higher in these two groups than in normal weighted patients. The average postoperative length of hospitalisation was 5.8 days. The surgical incision length averaged 7.8 cms for single level and 11.5 for two level fusions. 44% patients suffered a complication. These included cage migration due to a fall, wound infection, dural leak,pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis etc. No significant weight loss was recorded following the surgery.

Obese patients are a surgical challenge due to the comorbidities and difficulty in positioning and gaining good surgical access. The use of synframe retractor system improves surgical access, thereby reducing surgical time and blood loss. The surgical incision length was also comparable to normal weighted patients using this system. No significant weight loss was recorded following surgery. The high complication rate can be attributed to the associated comorbidities.

This study was performed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with rhBMP-2 and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with our standard treatment of allograft spacers and demineralised bone matrix.

Forty-six patients who underwent primary ACDF were included in the study. Twenty two patients with PEEK spacers and rhBMP-2 were compared to twenty four patients with allograft spacers and demineralised bone matrix all supplemented with an anterior locking plate. All patients were examined preoperatively and at two, six, twelve and twenty-four weeks and one and two years following surgery. Their cervical Oswestry scores,VAS for neck and arm pain and a pain diagram were recorded at every visit. A radiographic examination was also performed and patients were questioned for dysphagia, hoarseness of voice and any other difficulties. Radiographs were evaluated for prevertebral swelling, bone formation, subsidence and likelihood of fusion. CT scans were performed in any individual at twelve months if there was a concern of non union.

There was no significant difference in pain scores between rhBMP-2 and allograft spacer patients. There was improvement in both groups from their preoperative scores. Incidence of hoarseness of voice was also similar in both groups. There were statistically significant more patients with dysphagia in the rhBMP-2 group at two and six weeks following surgery. All patients in the rhBMP-2 group achieved a radiological diagnosis of probable fusion at their latest follow up (thirty-eight levels). In the allograft group 23/24 patients achieved a diagnosis of probable fusion (39/40 levels). End plate resorption was observed radiologically in 100% of the levels where rhBMP-2 was used. Prevertebral swelling on lateral radiographs was significantly greater in patients with rhBMP-2 causing dysphagia. The cost of implants was three times higher in patients with PEEK cage and rhBMP-2.

The use of rhBMP-2 leads to consistent fusion in the cervical spine. Significantly higher rates of prevertebral swelling, dysphagia and s higher cost are major drawbacks. End plate resorption was an unusual radiographic finding with the use of rhBMP-2.

RhBMP2 was used in thirty-six consecutive patients requiring interbody fusion with fifty-five levels (thirteen patients twenty levels ALIF, twelve patients seventeen levels TLIF, eleven patients eighteen levels ACDF) using anterior cervical locking plates and lumbar posterior pedicle screw constructs. All patients showed radiographic fusion at six months. Early lucency, subsidence, and increased pain occurred between six weeks and three months in 70% of ALIFS, 53% of TLIFS and 33% of ACDF’s. The average subsidence was 27% in ALIFS, 24% in TLIFS, and 53% in ACDF. Pain improved by the sixth month. We recommend alternative structural support when using RhBMP2.

To determine effectiveness of RhBMP2 in interbody fusion with machined allograft spacers (MTF Synthes Spine USA femoral ring, TLIF and fibular ring cervical spacers)

A prospective study of thirty-six consecutive patients requiring interbody fusion with fifty-five levels (thirteen patients twenty levels ALIF, twelve patients seventeen levels TLIF, eleven patients eighteen levels ACDF). Machined allograft spacers and RhBmp2 were supplemented with anterior locking plates in the cervical spine while the lumbar segments were supplemented posterior pedicle screws constructs. Patients were followed at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, one year. Patients were examined, had xrays, completed Oswestry scores, pain diagrams, and VAS for pain preoperatively and at every follow up appointment.

All the patients showed radiographic evidence of fusion at six months after surgery. Early lucency and subsidence of allografts was observed in 70% of ALIFS, 53% of TLIFS and 33% of ACDF’s. The average subsidence was 27% (range13–42%) in ALIFS, 24% in TLIFS (range 13–40%), and 53% in ACDF. Subsidence and reporting of increased pain occurred between the six- week and three month follow up after which patients improved.

Although high rates of early fusion can be accomplished with allograft spacers and rhBMP2 significant subsidence occurs in greater than 50% of lumbar cases and 30% of cervical cases due to early turnover and loss of structural support of the allograft. We recommend alternative structural support when using RhBMP2.

Dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture is a rare event. Two hundred nineteen patients underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture all with a modern stem and modular unipolar prosthesis at our institution over a three year period. Eleven patients (4.1%) suffered a dislocation. Epidemiologic, technical and anatomic-radiographic factors were reviewed to assess risk factors for dislocation. Our findings indicate that. Mental disease was a significant risk factor. Femoral neck offset and center edge angle of the acetabulum were also contributing factors for dislocation.

To determine the risk factors for dislocation after hemiarthroplasty with a modern stem and modular unipolar prosthesis for femoral neck fracture.

A retrospective review was undertaken at our institution from January 2000 to December 2003. We reviewed factors including gender, age, time of dislocation, medical comorbidities, side of operation, surgical approaches and radiographical data including femoral neck offset, contra lateral femoral neck offset, center edge angle, residual femoral neck, prosthesis femoral neck shaft angle and acetabular index.

Hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture was pre-formed on two hundred and nineteen patients all with a modular unipolar prosthesis. Eleven patients (4.1%) had at least one dislocation during a one year follow-up. The average time of dislocation following surgery was 19.3 days (std 12.7days). There were no significant difference for gender, age, surgical approach, residual femoral neck, and prosthesis femoral neck shaft angle. There was a statistical significance of mental disease in 55% of dislocated hemiarthroplasty compared to 21% of nondislocated hemiarthroplasty but other comorbidities were not a factor. Median femoral neck offset of nondislocated hemiarthroplasty measured 51mm versus dislocated hemiarthroplasty value of 47mm, a difference of 4 mm (P=0.043). Center edge angle of nondisplaced hemiarthroplasty measured median thirty-six degrees versus a median of thirty-two degrees for dislocated hemiarthroplasty, a difference of four degrees (P=0.006).

The factors predicting dislocation are likely multifactorial. Our findings indicate that Mental disease was a significant risk factor. Femoral neck offset and center edge angle of the acetabulum are contributing factors for dislocation.

We carried out a prospective study to determine whether the addition of a recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) to a machined allograft spacer would improve the rate of intervertebral body fusion in the spine. We studied 77 patients who were to undergo an interbody fusion with allograft and instrumentation. The first 36 patients received allograft with adjuvant rhBMP-2 (allograft/rhBMP-2 group), and the next 41, allograft and demineralised bone matrix (allograft/demineralised bone matrix group). Each patient was assessed clinically and radiologically both pre-operatively and at each follow-up visit using standard methods. Follow-up continued for two years.

Every patient in the allograft/rhBMP-2 group had fused by six months. However, early graft lucency and significant (> 10%) subsidence were seen radiologically in 27 of 55 levels in this group. The mean graft height subsidence was 27% (13% to 42%) for anterior lumbar interbody fusion, 24% (13% to 40%) for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and 53% (40% to 58%) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Those who had undergone fusion using allograft and demineralised bone matrix lost only a mean of 4.6% (0% to 15%) of their graft height.

Although a high rate of fusion (100%) was achieved with rhBMP-2, significant subsidence occurred in more than half of the levels (23 of 37) in the lumbar spine and 33% (6 of 18) in the cervical spine. A 98% fusion rate (62 of 63 levels) was achieved without rhBMP-2 and without the associated graft subsidence. Consequently, we no longer use rhBMP-2 with allograft in our practice if the allograft has to provide significant structural support.