header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Jan 2022
Mohammed R Shah P Durst A Mathai N Budu A Trivedi R Francis J Woodfield J Statham P Marjoram T Kaleel S Cumming D Sewell M Montgomery A Abdelaal A Jasani V Golash A Buddhiw S Rezajooi K Lee R Afolayan J Shafafy R Shah N Stringfellow T Ali C Oduoza U Balasubramanian S Pannu C Ahuja S
Full Access

Abstract

Aim

With resumption of elective spine surgery services following the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multi-centre BASS collaborative study to examine the clinical outcomes of surgeries.

Methods

Prospective data was collected from eight spinal centres in the first month of operating following restoration of elective spine surgery following the first wave. Primary outcomes measures were the 30-day mortality rate and postoperative Covid-19 infection rate. Secondary outcomes analysed were the surgical, medical adverse events and length of inpatient stay.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 488 - 488
1 Sep 2009
Maratos E Trivedi R Seeley H RICHARDS H Laing R
Full Access

Background: Intramedullary spinal cord tumours (ISCT) are rare with an annual incidence of less than 1 per 100,000 population. This makes assessing the efficacy of any treatment regimen difficult. Goals of management currently focus on obtaining a histological diagnosis for prognostic and therapeutic planning, and long-term tumour control. However, current outcome measures are crude and the quality of life outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumours remains uncertain.

Aim: The aims of this study are to assess disability and outcome in patients undergoing surgery for ISCT. We aim to provide prospective quality of life data on patients with spinal cord tumours.

Patients and Methods: Data was collected prospectively on patients undergoing surgery for ISCT between 1995–2006 under the care of the senior author. The Short Form 36 (SF36) Health Survey Questionnaire was self-administered prior to surgery and again at 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery. All patients were also classified using the Frankel disability score. SF36 data were analysed using the Friedman test with Dunn’s post-test for multiple comparisons and the Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs.

Results: Sixty-five patients (35 men, 30 women) had surgical interventions for ISCT. The mean age at first operation was 43y and median follow-up time was 60 months. 15% had astrocytomas, 45% ependymomas, 7 haemangioblastomas and 19 miscellaneous tumours.

Seventy-two percent of patients (47/65) were graded Frankel D pre-operatively and 65% (42/65) remained so after surgery. SF36 data were obtained for 17 patients. Pre-operatively, patients with ISCT had significantly lower SF36 physical domain scores when compared with normative data from age-matched population controls (p=0.0096). There was no difference between post-operative scores and those of normal controls. Matched pairs analysis on the patients with complete SF36 data sets (n=12) demonstrated a significant improvement in physical function post-operatively. Eleven of these 12 did not show an improvement in their Frankel grade, remaining Grade D pre- and post-operatively.

Conclusion: From this preliminary study it appears that patients with spinal cord tumours have significantly impaired physical function compared to the normal population. More importantly, we have demonstrated that the SF36 can detect changes in function associated with spinal cord tumour surgery that other, cruder measures, cannot.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 488 - 488
1 Sep 2009
Maratos E Trivedi R Richards H Seeley H Laing R
Full Access

BACKGROUND: Physical outcomes following surgery for degenerative spine disease have been well studied. It is only relatively recently however that the importance of psychological factors in determining outcome from spine surgery has been addressed. Previous studies suggest that pre-operative psychological distress is a predictor of poor outcome. In the drive to identify patients who will not benefit from spine surgery these patients may in future be denied surgery.

AIM: The aim of the current study was to examine the relationship between the severity of physical symptoms, levels of pre-operative psychological distress and out-come in patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing elective spinal surgery.

PATIENTS & METHODS: The study was a prospective cohort study. Health status and psychological distress were measured pre-operatively and at 12 months or more post-operatively using the Short Form 36 (SF36) Health Survey Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). We compared levels of physical disability (SF-36 physical domain scores) and psychological distress (HADS scores) before and after surgery in this group. Comparisons of pre- and post-operative scores were made using the Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Mann Whitney U tests as appropriate.

RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were included (178 men, 155 women, mean age 54y). Pre-operatively patients with severe levels of anxiety and depression (higher HADS score) had worse (lower) SF-36 physical domain (SF-36 PD) scores compared to those with normal HADS scores (median 181.5 vs 109, p< 0.0001). Both HADS and SF-36 PD scores improved post-operatively (HADS 13 vs 6 p< 0.0001; SF-36 PD 134 vs 250.5 p< 0.0001). Greater reduction in HADS score was observed in patients with severe pre-operative HADS scores compared to those with normal pre-operative HADS scores (p< 0.0001). Patients with severe HADS scores also had greater improvement in SF36 PD scores when compared to patients with normal pre-operative HADS scores (77.24 vs 53.87 p=0.03).

CONCLUSION: Poor physical function pre-operatively correlates with severe psychological distress. Both physical and psychological symptoms improve after surgery. Severe levels of anxiety and depression pre-operatively are associated with the greatest symptomatic improvement and psychological morbidity does not worsen outcome.