header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 35 - 35
1 Jul 2020
Higgins M Salih S Bhaskar D Buckley S Townsend R Davies M
Full Access

Introduction

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the leading cause of failure of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty. It is challenging condition which represents a growing burden on hospital resources. In-patient hospital stay for antibiotic therapy post-operatively is costly and access to out-patient IV therapy (OPAT) varies between regions. In a tertiary referral centre for revision and infection, the suitability and cost-effectiveness of Dalbavancin was reviewed as a “single-shot” therapy following DAIR or revision lower limb arthroplasty for PJI.

Methods & Materials

A prospective service evaluation was carried out for consecutive patients treated for PJI of the hip or knee who received Dalbavancin. Treatment was indicated by Consultant Microbiologist advice within an MDT setting where clinical or patient factors made alternative therapies eg. OPAT inappropriate. Service-level data was collected to allow calculation of bed-day savings compared to a traditional 14-day course of IV treatment. Readmission rates to the trust within 30 days were reviewed as a marker of clinical efficacy and safety.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 40 - 40
1 Jul 2020
Bhaskar D Higgins M Mosby D Townsend R Harrison T
Full Access

Literature debates whether fluid aspirates for suspected PJI should undergo prolonged incubation for cultures. We looked at sensitivity and specificity of 14-day cultures, compared to 7-days, for aspirates from prosthetic hips and knees.

Design and methods

Conducted at a quaternary referral centre for PJIs from Jan 2017 to July 2019. Suspected PJIs who underwent aspiration, incubated 14 days and later surgical intervention with minimum three tissue samples were included.

Results

176 aspirates were included. This is an increased number compared to our historic figures (average 88 Vs 48 pts/yr).

47 patients had fluid and tissue positive (true positive), 20 fluid +ive but tissue -ive (false positive), 98 fluid and tissue -ive (true negative) and 15 fluid negative but tissue +ive (False negative). Thus, sensitivity 76%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value70% and negative predictive value 87%.

Of 88 positive aspirates, only 75% were within 7-day cultures. Low virulence organisms as Propionibacterium acnes and coagulase negative staph were grown later.

Of 48 with only one tissue sample positive, 38 were culture-negative on aspiration and 6 grew different organisms on aspirate and tissues. Also, as many were cultured later, it suggests contamination.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 29 - 29
1 Aug 2018
Stockley I Partridge D Cooper R Townsend R
Full Access

No single test is 100% sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Joint aspiration is currently the only preoperative investigation that can establish the identity of the infecting organism and its antibiotic susceptibilities. Frequently when attempting to aspirate a joint a ‘dry tap occurs as fluid cannot be aspirated. In this situation, normal saline may be injected into the joint and then reaspirated to provide fluid for culture.

The aim of this study was to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of culture of joint aspiratie with or without saline reaspiration in the event of a dry tap.

A retrospective analysis of 580 hip and knee aspirations in patients deemed to have moderate-high risk of infection and ultimately proceeded to revision arthroplasty over 12 years at a large quaternary referral centre where pre operative aspiration is routine.

Fluid was aspirated in 313 (54%) cases and dry taps in which saline injection reaspiration was performed occurred in 267 (46%) cases. Overall sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic aspiration were 84% (78–89%) and 85% (81–88%) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of saline injection-reaspiration after dry tap were 87% (79–82%) and 79% (72–84%) compared to 81% (71–88%) and 90% (85–93%) for direct aspiration.

Pre operative joint aspiration and culture is a sensitive and specific test for the confirmation of diagnosis in patients at a moderate to high risk of prosthetic joint infection. Culture of saline injection-reaspiration also provides accurate diagnostic information in the event of a dry tap. Both methods allow susceptibility testing of relevant organisms and are therefore able to guide peri-operative and cement instilled antibiotic therapy.

Culture of pre operative joint aspirates provides sensitive and specific diagnostic information including antimicrobial susceptibility results.

Saline injection-reaspiration is a useful additional technique in those patients in whom fluid cannot be aspirated.