Metastatic spinal disease is a common entity of much debate in terms of ideal surgical treatment. The introduction of MIS can be a game-changer in the treatment of MSD due to less peri-operative morbidity and allowing earlier radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Less invasive techniques have always been welcome for management of patients with ‘Metastatic Spinal Disorders’. This is because these patients can be poor candidates for extensive / major invasive surgery even though radiologically, there may be an indication for one. The aim of the treatment with Minimal Invasive Fixation (MIS) systems is mainly for ‘pain relief’ than to radically decrease tumour burden or to achieve near total spinal cord decompression, which could be major presentations in these patients. These procedures address the ‘spinal instability’ very well and they can address pain associated with compression fractures resulting from metastatic disease from a solid organ as well as multiple myeloma with minimal complications. These procedures can be combined with radiology and chemotherapy without much concern for wound problems in the way of infection or dehiscence. They also have a great advantage of timing of adjunct therapy closer to the index procedure. The disadvantage, however, are they do not allow thorough decompression of the spinal cord. There could also be problem in addressing patients who have severe vertebral height loss or loss of integrity of the anterior column where anterior column reconstruction may be required. There is a risk of inadequate fixation or implant loosening or failure. We aim to examine the results of MIS surgery in our department and support the rationale for its use.Summary
Introduction
Anterior only procedure for stable thoraco-lumbar burst fractures is controversial. Prospective collection of clinical and radiological data in stable burst fractures with neurological deficit undergoing anterior only decompression and stabilisation with 2-year follow-up. 14 consecutive patients (8 females, 6 males) with two-column thoracolumbar burst fracture and neurological deficit underwent anterior corpectomy/hemi-corpectomy and instrumentation, from February 2007 to February 2009. Radiological data included classification of fracture (AO classification), kyphus angle and degree of canal compromise. Post-operative CT scans done to assess radiological improvement. Clinical data included neurological deficit at presentation, improvement or changes in neurology, length of surgery, estimated blood loss, post-operative complications and length of stay. Commonest mechanism was fall from height. 10 patients had incomplete burst fractures amenable to hemi-corpectomy. 8 of our patients were ASIA D, 4 were ASIA C or lower. They all improved by at least one grade. 2 patients had identical ASIA grade pre and post operatively. Pre-operative spinal canal compromise averaged 52.6% and vertebral body height loss averaged 48.9%. The mean kyphotic angles improved from 19.6° to 7.9 °. There were two cases with minor injury to the diaphragm, one developing a pneumothorax. Mean length of surgery and hospital stay were 4hours and 21minutes and 11.8 days respectively. The fractures in which the top part is burst and causing canal compromise, could be dealt with by top hemi-corpectomy requiring smaller approach. One stage anterior – only stabilization can yield successful clinical results.
