Femoral neck fractures are the second cause of hospitalization in elderly patients. Nowadays it is still not clear whether surgical treatment may provide better clinical outcome than conservative treatment in patients affected by mental disorders, such as senile dementia.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess mortality and clinical and functional outcome after hemi arthroplasty operation following intracapsular neck fractures in patients with senile dementia.

Between 2008 and 2014, 819 patients were treated at our Orthopaedic Institute for neck fracture of the femur (mean age: 83.8 years old). Eighty-four of these showed clear signs of cognitive impairment at time of admission in the Emergency Department. Mental state of patients was assessed in all cases, as routine, at the Emergency Room with the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (Sh-MMT) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Patients were divided in two groups depending whether they were surgically treated with hemiarthroplasty (Group B, 46 patients; 35 females, 11 males; mean age: 88.5 y.o.) or conservatively treated (Group C, 38 patients; 28 females, 10 males; mean age: 79.5 y.o.).

These two groups were compared with a matched case-control group of patients surgically treated with no mental disorders (Group A, 40 patients; 34 females, 6 males; mean age: 81.5 y.o.)

Incidence of mortality, systemic or local complications and functional clinical outcomes were evaluated with the ADL score and the Barthel index.

Mortality rate was 35% (14 patients) for Group A, 50% (21 patients) for Group B and 95% (22 patients) for Group C. Paired t-test, with significance rate set at 0.05, showed significant higher mortality rate in Group A compared to both Group B (p:0.02) and Group C (p:0.001), and also between Group B and Group C (p:0.01). Three orthopaedic complications were found in Group B (two cases of infection and one dislocation of the prosthesis) while none in Group A (p<0.001). There have been 14 overall general complication in Group A (33%), 16 in group B (38%) and 15 in Group C (65%), with significant higher rate in Group B vs. Group A (p:0.02) and in group C vs. Group B (p: 0.001)

Activity daily living scale and Barthel Index results showed higher results in Group B than Group C both in terms of recovery of walking ability and daily living (hairdressing, wearing clothes, eating).

For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Manual postoperative CT calculation of anteversion and inclination of the acetabular cup can be inaccurate and depends on the observer's experience. The aim of this study is to describe and present a validation of a new CT-image-based dedicate software (EGIT) for calculation of the acetabular component placement.

The software principle is based on a three-dimensional reconstruction of a patient's bones from anatomical data collected postoperatively on the patient's CT scan.

15 Patient to be operated for THR were enrolled in this study. All patients were evaluated with post operative CT-scan. Measurement of Cup positioning were performed with two different methods: a manual method, performed by an expert radiologist, and a software CT image based method. Statistical analysis was performed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficent to asses interobserver and intraobserver reliability. A paired T-test was used to detect differences between manual and software methods.

The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was excellent for both the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. As expected the ICC is higher in the interobserver case.

A mean cup anteversion of 14.2 (S.D. ±6.9), mean inclination of 44.2 (S.D.± 5.8) are detected with EGIT by the expert surgeon; Mean Cup anteversion of 13.6 (S.D. ± 5.11), mean inclination of 43.3 (S.D.± 5.1) are detected with manual method by expert radiologist. No statistical difference have been found (P> 0.05).

The EGIT software seems to be an easy, accurate and reproducible method to calculate acetabular cup positioning using standard post-operative CT scan in THA.

The choice of surgical technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA) can affect time and postoperative rehabilitation procedures. The aim of this prospective blinded cohort study is to determine significant differences in gait parameters in the short term between those patients who have experienced THA using a limited incision anterolateral intermuscular (MIS) approach compared with those who have experienced traditional lateral transmuscular (LTM) approach.

Thirty patients were enrolled in this study, 15 of who received the MIS technique and 15 the LTM approach. A single surgeon performed all the operations using short hip stem implants with 36mm femoral head size and all patients received a standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Patients, physiotherapists, and assessors were blinded to the incision used. Gait analysis was performed 30 day after surgery, when patients were able to ambulate without crutches.

Minimal differences in temporostatial parameters were shown between the MIS and LTM groups, whereas significant differences (p< 0.05) in kinematics (hip range of motion in sagittal, frontal and transverse planes), kinetics (hip flexion/extension and abduction/adduction moments) and electromiography parameters (gluteus medius activation pattern and degree of activity) between two groups.

This study demonstrates functional benefits of the minimally invasive incision over the standard lateral transmuscular approach in terms of walking ability 30 days postoperatively.

Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a rare complication. In the literature, several different managements have been proposed.

A total of 1232 ACL reconstruction procedures were performed from January 2001 and December 2008. Twelve patients (0.97%) had a post-operative infection. The average age at trauma was 24 years (range:16–43). Treatment included continuous irrigation of the knee (4 hour/day for 2 days) and parenteral and oral antibiotics subsequently for a mean of 7 weeks (range:4–12 weeks). The average time at follow-up was 38 months (range 6–54 months). Follow-up included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) forms, radiographs, the Tegner and Lysholm scores and KT-1000 arthrometric evaluation.

In all cases treatment of infection was successful. In no cases graft or hardware removal was needed. At final examination pivot shift was negative in 10/12 patients and 1+ in 2/12 patients. In all cases the Lachman was negative. The mean postoperative Tegner score was 7.2 (range 5–9), the mean Lysholm score was 98.3 (range 69–100). 10/12 patients were graded as Group A and 2/12 patients as group B using the IKDC. The mean postoperative manual maximum KT-1000 side to side difference was 2.3 (range1–4), with 10 patients between 0 and 3 mm and 2 between 3 and 5 mm. No significative bone tunnel enlargement was found.

The described treatment gives reliable results. There were no recurrences of septic arthritis or bone infection. No further surgeries were required. The graft can be retained during treatment of septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction.

The KT1000 is widely accepted as a tool for the instrumented measurement of the anteroposterior tibial translation. The aim of this study is to compare the data obtained with the KT1000 in ACL deficient knees with the data obtained using a navigation system during “in vivo” ACL reconstruction procedures and to validate the accuracy of the KT1000.

An ACL reconstruction was performed using computer aided surgical navigation (Orthopilot, B-Braun, A esculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) in thirty patients. Antero-posterior laxity measurements were obtained for all patients using KT1000 arthrometer (in a conscious state and under general anesthesia) and during surgery using the navigation system, always at 30° of knee flexion.

The mean AP translation was 14±4 mm and 15,6±3,8 using the KT1000 in conscious and under general anesthesia respectively (p=0.02) and 16,1±3,7 mm using navigation. Measurements with the KT1000 under general anesthesia were not different to those obtained “in vivo” with the navigation system (p=0,37).

In conclusion this study validates the accuracy of the KT1000 to exactly calculate AP translation of the tibia, in comparison with the more accurate measurements obtained using a navigation system.

Introduction: In the last few years minimally invasive surgery in hip replacement is becoming more popular among orthopaedic surgeons because of less morbidity and faster rehabilitation. However several complications have been reported expecially in the so called “learning curve” (first twenty cases). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning curve of three different minimally invasive approaches.

Methods and Materials: In this study three different surgical approaches of THA were evaluated: lateral mini incision (GroupA), minimally invasive anterior approach (GroupB) and minimally invasive antero lateral approach (GroupC). The first twenty cases of each surgical approach were selected and compared with a control group (GroupD) of 149 total hip replacement operated using a lateral standard approach (> 12 cm) in the same period by the same experienced surgeon.

In all cases a specialized dedicated surgical instrumentation was used. Inclusion criteria to enter the study group (A-B-C Groups) were:BMI< 30, diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis, age< 75 years.

Following parameters were evaluated: intra and post operative complications, total blood loss, time of surgery, component placement, length of hospital stay and functional outcomes (HHS, WOMAC) at six weeks.

Results: No dislocations, infections and early aseptic loosening were detected in groups A, B and C. No significant differences were detected regarding the length of hospital stay in all groups. In group B the time of surgery was significantly higher than in group D. The total blood loss of group A, B and C was statistically lower than group D. Clinical outcomes at six weeks in groups B and C were significantly better that in group A and D. The following complications were detected:

Group A: two sciatic nerve palsy (one transient and one permanent), one greater trochanter fracture, one femoral stem malposition.

Group B: one greater trochanter fracture, one proximal femoral fracture, one rupture of tensor fasciae latae, two haematomas.

Group C: no complications were detected.

In control group D (149 patients) the following complications were observed: one proximal femoral fracture, one case of cup malposition and one infection.

Conclusions: The main advantages of all MIS approaches seem to be the reduced total blood loss, even in the learning curve. However during learning curve the minimally invasive approaches seem to have a higher rate of complications than the standard procedures even in selected patients. In muscle sparing approaches (anterior and antero lateral) the early functional outcomes are better than other approaches (standard and mini incision). Among the evaluated minimally invasive procedures, the antero lateral approach seems to be safer and less demanding than others.

The surgical treatment of typical pathological conditions of the knee combined with deflections along the sagittal axis is complex, especially when the angles of such deflections are considerable in size.

Prior to treatment, the first problem concerns detecting the origin of the deflection, whether it is osseous, ligamentous or mixed, especially in cases of knee recurvation. The possibility of finding patients with what is known as “prophylactic” correction of the deflection is very rare.

Orthopaedic surgeons may encounter some cases in which deformation along the sagittal axis represents the primum movens of the pathology and others in which this deflection represents a further problem in curing the condition. The different situations may require the following different treatments: (a) Correction of the deflection; (b) correction of the deflection and the pathological condition; and (c) correction of the pathological condition and not the deflection.

We believe that, in the most serious cases, the deflection must be corrected and then meticulous pre-operative preparation is required. However, in order to select the most appropriate treatment, it is essential, in our opinion, to determine the cause of the deflection along the sagittal axis.

In our experience, the treatment of pathological conditions of the knee such as ligamentous reconstruction, knee arthroplasty and corrective osteotomies combined with deflection along the sagittal axis increase the difficulties of surgery, especially in cases of relevant knee recurvation, both osseous and ligamentous.