Aims

The primary aim was to assess the rate of patient deferral of elective orthopaedic surgery and whether this changed with time during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The secondary aim was to explore the reasons why patients wanted to defer surgery and what measures/circumstances would enable them to go forward with surgery.

The pain of arthritic disorders occurs in a social and environmental context. Thus, the pain of arthritis not only can affect the patient, but also the spouse. Numerous investigations have shown that the spouses of individuals with persistent pain report lower levels of marital satisfaction, higher rates of depression and lower quality of life. For the vast majority of patients with osteoarthritis, total hip (THA) or total knee (TKA) arthroplasty results in a significant reduction in pain, emotional distress, disability and a significant improvement in their quality of life and function. Little is currently known about how these recovery-related changes impact on the spouse or the marital relationship.

Patients and their spouses were recruited within one-year following the arthroplasty surgery. Couples participated in a semi-structured interview and were each asked to recall their level of pain on a numerical rating scale from 1 to 10 before and after recovering from surgery, and provide a numerical rating score (10 points) for a set of seven questions pertaining to their level of disability in seven different activities of daily living. In addition, the spouses were asked to list in order of importance the ways in which the surgery of their spouse affected their overall quality of life. In total, 33 couples (66 respondents) answered the survey questionnaire. There were 17 male patients, 16 female patients who underwent 29 THAs and 4 TKAs.

With regard to pain, the spouses estimated their partner's pain, both preoperatively and at the time of the survey, to be at a significantly higher level than the patient's perception (p=0.05). The spouses perceived a greater improvement in family/home responsibilities, recreation and social activities, and in their occupation than that noted by the partner. After the arthroplasty, the spouses indicated that their lives had improved with respect to doing more activities/leisure (70%), because there partner had less suffering (61%), they had more independence/less caregiving (54%), it improved their marital relationship (54%), they had a better social/family life (27%) and they were able to travel (27%).

In addition to the patient, THA and TKA result in a significant improvement in quality of life and marital functioning of the spouse. This should not continue to be unrecognized as a significant benefit of the procedure.

BACKGROUND

Ideal treatment of displaced femoral neck fragility fractures in the previously ambulatory patient remains controversial. Treating these patients with total hip arthroplasty has improved patient reported outcomes and reduced rates of revision surgery compared to those treated with hemiarthroplasty. However, possible increased risk of dislocation remains a concern with total hip arthroplasty.

The anterolateral and direct anterior approaches to total hip replacement have been applied in the femoral neck fracture population to minimize dislocation rates. However, the anterolateral approach has been associated with abductor injury and increased rates of heterotopic ossification while the anterior approach has been associated with peri-prosthetic femur fracture, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, and wound complications. The Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted (SuperPATH) approach was developed to minimize disruption of the capsule and short-external rotators in an effort to reduce the risk of dislocation and assist in quicker recovery in the elective hip arthroplasty setting. To achieve this, the SuperPATH technique allows the femur to be prepared in situ and the acetabulum to be reamed percutaneously once the femoral head is removed.

This study investigates the post-operative time to ambulation, length of stay, discharge destination, and early dislocation rate of previously ambulatory patients with a displaced femoral neck fragility fracture that were treated with a total hip arthroplasty via the SuperPATH technique.

BACKGROUND

The need for post-operative manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty is a frustrating complication that can lead to suboptimal outcomes if range-of-motion to a functional level is not regained. Implant morphology and kinematics, PCL imbalance, and soft-tissue balancing can all contribute to post-operative stiffness. Utilization of total knee arthroplasty components that replicate the native knee's medial ball and socket kinematics may lead to easier maintenance of flexion post-operatively compared to conventional components.

INTRODUCTION

The direct anterior approach to THR has become an increasingly popular minimally-invasive technique in an effort to minimize dislocation risk, facility early recovery, and diminish soft tissue injury. However, it has been associated with unique complications including intraoperative femur fracture, cutaneous nerve palsy, stem subsidence, and wound healing complications. These risk of these complications have been documented to be more likely in the surgeon's early experience with the approach. The minimally-invasive Supercapsular Percutaneous-Assisted (SuperPATH) technique was developed to minimize capsular and short-external rotator injury, minimize dislocation risk, and provide an easier transition from the standard posterior approach.

Introduction

Orientation of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty has been shown to influence component wear, stability, and impingement. Freehand placement of the component can lead to widely variable radiographic outcomes. Accurate abduction, in particular, can be difficult in the lateral decubitus position due to limited ability to appreciate and control positional obliquity of the pelvis. A CT-based mechanical navigation device has been shown to decrease cup placement error. This is an independent report of a single-surgeon's radiographic results using the device to control cup abduction.