Aims

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is commonly classified based on the time of onset of symptoms. Early infections (< two weeks) are treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). For late infections (> ten weeks), guidelines recommend implant removal due to tolerant biofilms. For delayed infections (two to ten weeks), recommendations are unclear. In this study we compared infection clearance and bone healing in early and delayed FRI treated with DAIR in a rabbit model.

Aim

The time to onset of symptoms after fracture fixation is still commonly used to classify fracture-related infections (FRI). Early infections (<2 weeks) can often be treated with debridement, systemic antibiotics, irrigation, and implant preservation (DAIR). Late infections (>10 weeks) typically require implant removal as mature, antibiotic-tolerant biofilms have formed. However, the recommendations for delayed infections (2–10 weeks) are not clearly defined. Here, infection healing and bone healing in early and delayed FRI is investigated in a rabbit model with a standardized DAIR procedure.

Aim

Debridement, Antibiotics, Irrigation, and implant Retention (DAIR) is a surgical treatment protocol suitable for some patients with fracture related infection (FRI). Clinically relevant pre-clinical models of DAIR are scarce and none have been developed in large animals. Therefore, this project aimed to develop a large animal model for FRI including a DAIR approach and compare outcomes after 2 or 5 weeks of infection.

Aim

Differentiation of infected (INF) nonunion from aseptic (AS) nonunion is crucial for the choice of intra- and postoperative treatment. Preoperative diagnosis of infected nonunion is challenging, especially in case of low-grade infection lacking clinical signs of infection. Standard blood markers such as C-reactive protein or leucocyte count do not aid in preoperative diagnosis. Proteomic profiling has shown promising results for differentiation of numerous chronic disease states, and in this study was applied to preoperative blood samples of patients with nonunion in an attempt to identify potential biomarkers.

In chronically infected fracture non-unions, treatment requires extensive debridement to remove necrotic and infected bone, often resulting in large defects requiring elaborate and prolonged bone reconstruction. One approach includes the induced membrane technique (IMT), although the differences in outcome between infected and non-infectious aetiologies remain unclear. Here we present a new rabbit humerus model for IMT secondary to infection, and, furthermore, we compare bone healing in rabbits with a chronically infected non-union compared to non-infected equivalents.

A 5 mm defect was created in the humerus and filled with a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer or left empty (n=6 per group). After 3 weeks, the PMMA spacer was replaced with a beta-tricalcium phosphate (chronOs, Synthes) scaffold, which was placed within the induced membrane and observed for a further 10 weeks. The same protocol was followed for the infected group, except that four week prior to treatment, the wound was inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (4×10⁶ CFU/animal) and the PMMA spacer was loaded with gentamicin, and systemic therapy was applied for 4 weeks prior to chronOs application.

All the animals from the infected group were culture positive during the first revision surgery (mean 3×10⁵ CFU/animal, n= 12), while at the second revision, after antibiotic therapy, all the animals were culture negative. The differences in bone healing between the non-infected and infected groups were evaluated by radiography and histology. The initially infected animals showed impaired bone healing at euthanasia, and some remnants of bacteria in histology. The non-infected animals reached bone bridging in both empty and chronOs conditions.

We developed a preclinical in vivo model to investigate how bacterial infection influence bone healing in large defects with the future aim to explore new treatment concepts of infected non-union.