The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) arthroplasty has been used as a surgical treatment of coxarthrosis since 1997. We present 20-year results of 234 consecutive BHRs performed in our unit. Between 1999 and 2001, there were 217 patients: 142 males (65.4%), mean age 52 years (18 to 68) who had 234 implants (17 bilateral). They had patient-reported outcome measures collected, imaging (radiograph and ultrasound), and serum metal ion assessment. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Revision for any cause was considered as an endpoint for the analysis.Aims
Methods
Acetabular component positioning is commonly referenced with the pelvis in the supine position in direct anterior approach THA. Changes in pelvic tilt (PT) from the pre-operative supine to the post-operative standing positions have not been well investigated and may have relevance to optimal acetabular component targeting for reduced risk of impingement and instability. The aims of this study were therefore to determine the change in PT that occurs from pre-operative supine to post-operative standing, and whether any factors are associated with significant changes in tilt ≥13° in posterior direction. 13° in a posterior direction was chosen as that amount of posterior rotation creates an increase in functional anteversion of the acetabular component of 10°. 1097 THA patients with pre-operative supine CT and standing lateral radiographic imaging and 1 year post-operative standing lateral radiographs (interquartile range 12–13 months) were reviewed. Pre-operative supine PT was measured from CT as the angle between the anterior pelvic plane (APP) and the horizontal plane of the CT device. Standing PT was measured on standing lateral x-rays as the angle between the APP and the vertical line. Patients with ≥13° change from supine pre-op to standing post-op (corresponding to a 10° change in cup anteversion) were grouped and compared to those with a <13° change using unpaired student's t-tests. Mean pre-operative supine PT (3.8±6.0°) was significantly different from mean post-operative standing PT (−3.5±7.1°, p<0.001), ie mean change of −7.3±4.6°. 10.4% (114/1097) of patients had posterior PT changes ≥13° supine pre-op to standing post-op. A significant number of patients, ie 1 in 10, undergo a clinically significant change in PT and functional anteversion from supine pre-op to standing post-op. Surgeons should be aware of these changes when planning component placement in THA.
Adverse spinal motion or balance (spine mobility) and adverse pelvic mobility, in combination, are often referred to as adverse spinopelvic mobility (SPM). A stiff lumbar spine, large posterior standing pelvic tilt, and severe sagittal spinal deformity have been identified as risk factors for increased hip instability. Adverse SPM can create functional malposition of the acetabular components and hence is an instability risk. Adverse pelvic mobility is often, but not always, associated with abnormal spinal motion parameters. Dislocation rates for dual-mobility articulations (DMAs) have been reported to be between 0% and 1.1%. The aim of this study was to determine the early survivorship from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) of patients with adverse SPM who received a DMA. A multicentre study was performed using data from 227 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), enrolled consecutively. All the patients who had one or more adverse spine or pelvic mobility parameter had a DMA inserted at the time of their surgery. The mean age was 76 years (22 to 93) and 63% were female (n = 145). At a mean of 14 months (5 to 31) postoperatively, the AOANJRR was analyzed for follow-up information. Reasons for revision and types of revision were identified.Aims
Methods
Adverse spinopelvic mobility (SPM) has been shown to increase risk of dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). In patients undergoing THA, prevalence of adverse SPM has been shown to be as high as 41%. Stiff lumbar spine, large posterior standing pelvic tilt and severe sagittal spinal deformity have been identified as risk factors for increased hip instability. Dislocation rates for dual mobility articulations have been reported to be 0% to 1.1%. The aim of this study was to determine the early survivorship from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) of patients with adverse SPM who received a dual mobility articulation. A multicentre study was performed using data from 229 patients undergoing primary THA, enrolled consecutively. All the patients who had one or more adverse spine or pelvic mobility parameters had a dual mobility articulation inserted at the time of their surgery. Average age was 76 (22 to 93) years and 63% were female. At a mean of 2.1 (1 – 3.3) years post-op, the AOANJRR was analysed for follow-up. Reasons for revision and types of revision were identified. The AOANJRR reported two revisions. One due to infection and the second due to femoral component loosening. No revisions for dislocation were reported. One patient died with the prosthesis in situ. Kaplan Meier survival was 99.3% (CI 98.3% − 100%) at 2 years. DM bearings reduce the risk of dislocation of primary THA in patients with adverse spine and pelvic mobility.
The prevalence of the various patterns of spinopelvic abnormalities that increase the risk for prosthetic impingement is unknown. While prior surgery or lumbar fusion are recognized as a risk factors for postoperative dislocation, many patients presenting for THA do not have obvious radiographic abnormalities. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of large posterior pelvic tilt (PPT) when standing, stiff lumbar-spine (SLL) and spino-pelvic sagittal imbalance (SSI) in patients undergoing primary THA. A consecutive series of 1592 patients (56% female) over 2 years underwent functional analysis of spinopelvic mobility using CT, standing, and flexed seated lateral radiographs as part of pre-operative THA planning. The average age was 65 (20–93). We investigated the prevalence of these 3 validated spinopelvic parameters known to increase the risk for impingent and correlated them to the patient's age and gender using Chi squared analysis. Finally, the risk of flexion and extension impingement was modeled for each patient at a default supine cup orientation (DSCO) of 40°/20° (±5°).Introduction
Methods
There remains confusion in the literature with regard to the spinopelvic relationship, and its contribution to ideal acetabular component position. Critical assessment of the literature has been limited by use of conflicting terminology and definitions of new concepts that further confuse the topic. In 2017, the concept of a Hip-Spine Workgroup was created with the first meeting held at the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Annual Meeting in 2018. The goal of this workgroup was to first help standardize terminology across the literature so that as a topic, multiple groups could produce literature that is immediately understandable and applicable. This consensus review from the Hip-Spine Workgroup aims to simplify the spinopelvic relationship, offer hip surgeons a concise summary of available literature, and select common terminology approved by both hip surgeons and spine surgeons for future research. Cite this article:
A total hip replacement (THR) patient's spinopelvic mobility might predispose them to an increased risk of impingement, instability and edge-loading. This risk can be minimised by considering their preoperative movement during planning of component alignment. However, the question of whether the preoperative, arthritic motion is representative of the postoperative mobility has been raised. We aimed to determine the change in functional pelvic tilt in a series of THR patients at one-year. Four-hundred and eleven patients had their pelvic tilt and lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) measured in the standing and flexed-seated (position when patients initiate rising from a seat) positions as part of routine planning for THR. All measurements were performed on lateral radiographs. At 12-months postoperatively, the same two lateral images were taken and pelvic tilt measured. Pearson correlation was used to investigate the linear relationship between pre-and post-op pelvic tilt. Furthermore, a predictive model of post-op pelvic tilt was developed using machine learning algorithms. The model incorporating four preoperative inputs – standing pelvic tilt, seated pelvic tilt, standing LLA and seated LLA. In the standing position, there was a mean 2° posterior rotation after THR, with a maximum posterior change of 13°. The Pearson correlation coefficient between pre-and post-op standing pelvic tilt was 0.84. This prediction of post-op standing tilt improved to 0.91 when the three further inputs were incorporated to the predictive model. In the flexed-seated position, there was a mean 7° anterior rotation after THR, with a maximum anterior change of 45°. The Pearson correlation coefficient between pre-and post-op seated pelvic tilt was 0.54. This prediction of post-op seated tilt improved to 0.71 when the three further inputs were incorporated to the predictive model. The best predictor of post-operative spinopelvic mobility, is the patients pre-operative spinopelvic mobility, and this should routinely be measured when planning THR The predictive model will continue to improve in accuracy as more data and more variables (contralateral hip pathology, pelvic incidence, age and gender) are incorporated into the model.
It is important to consider sagittal pelvic rotation when introducing
the acetabular component at total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose
of this study was to identify patients who are at risk of unfavourable
pelvic mobility, which could result in poor outcomes after THA. A consecutive series of 4042 patients undergoing THA had lateral
functional radiographs and a low-dose CT scan to measure supine
pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, standing pelvic tilt, flexed-seated
pelvic tilt, standing lumbar lordotic angle, flexed-seated lumbar
lordotic angle, and lumbar flexion. Changes in pelvic tilt from
supine-to-standing positions and supine-to-flexed-seated positions
were determined. A change in pelvic tilt of 13° between positions was
deemed unfavourable as it alters functional anteversion by 10° and
effectively places the acetabular component outside the safe zone
of orientation.Aims
Patients and Methods
The pelvis moves in the sagittal plane during functional activity. This can be detrimental to functional cup orientation. Increased pelvic mobility could be a risk factor for instability and edge-loading, in both flexion and/or extension. The aim of this study was to investigate how gender, age and lumbar spine stiffness, affects the number of patients at risk of excessive sagittal pelvic mobility. Pre-operatively, 3428 patients had their pelvic tilt and lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) measured in three positions; supine, standing and flexed-seated. The pelvic rotation from supine-to-standing and from supine-to-seated was determined from the difference in pelvic tilt measurements between positions. Lumbar flexion was determined as the difference between LLA standing and LLA when flexed-seated. Patients were stratified into groups based upon age, gender, and lumbar flexion. The percentage of patients in each group with “at risk” pelvic rotation, defined by rotation ≥13° in a detrimental direction, was determined. There was an increased incidence of “at risk” pelvic mobility with increasing age, and decreasing lumbar flexion. This was more pronounced in females. Notably, 31% of elderly females had “at risk” pelvic mobility. Furthermore, 38% of patients with lumbar flexion <20° had “at risk” pelvic mobility. “At risk” pelvic mobility was more common in older patients and in patients with limited lumbar flexion. Additional stability, such as a dual mobility articulation, might be advisable in patient cohort. However, the majority of patients exhibiting “at risk” pelvic mobility were not older than 75, and did not have lumbar flexion <20°. This supports analysis of pelvic mobility on all patients undergoing THR.
We describe the experience with the first consecutive 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings at our centre. At a mean follow-up of three years (25 to 52 months) survivorship was 99.14% with revision in one patient for a loose acetabular component and one death from unrelated causes. One patient developed a fracture of the femoral neck at six weeks which united unremarkably after a period of non-weight-bearing. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 62.54 (8 to 92) to 97.74 (61 to 100). The mean flexion improved from 91.52° (25 to 140) to 110.41° (80 to 145). Most patients (97%) considered the outcome to be good or excellent. Our preliminary experience with this implant is encouraging and the results are superior to the earlier generation of resurfacings for the same length of follow-up.
