header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 72 - 72
1 Jun 2012
Ghosh S Shah B
Full Access

Introduction

A 68 year old female patient underwent a left total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in March 2004. She was referred back by her GP 5 years as she was struggling with mobility and felt there were mice in her hip. It was squeking so loudly that it could be hear at a distance of 25 metres. There was no history of any falls or dislocation in the last 5 years. The implant used was an Exeter/ABG ceramic total hip prosthesis with Palacos cement. This ladies discomfort in her hip had been always there. She never described herself as being satisfied with the THR. However, her discomfort had worsened terribly over the last year.

On examination

The slightest movement around her hip caused her severe pain. Tremendous squeaking could be heard when she was made to walk. She had significantly limb length discrepancy of 2.5cms. The radiographs revealed that she had probably broken the ceramic head as pieces could be seen around the neck area.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 71 - 71
1 Jun 2012
Ghosh S Shah B Bhansali H
Full Access

Introduction

Revision surgery is generally recommended for recurrent dislocation following Total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, dislocation following revision THA continues to remain a problem with further dislocation rates upto 28% quoted in literature.

We present early results of one of the largest series in U.K. using dual mobility cemented acetabular cup for recurrent hip dislocation.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 40 patients where revision of hip replacement was performed using cemented dual mobility acetabular prosthesis for recurrent dislocations from March 2006 till August 2009 at our district general hospital by a single surgeon (senior author). The series comprised of 13 men and 27 females with average age of 73.4 years (49-92). The mean follow-up period was 23 months. (36 months –6 months).

All the hips that were revised had 3 or more dislocations, some them more than 10 times. The cause of dislocation was multifactorial in majority of cases including acetabular component malpositioning mainly due to loosening and wear. A cemented dual mobility cup was used in all cases. In six cases the femoral stem was also revised.