header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 30 - 30
24 Nov 2023
van Hoogstraten S Samijo S Geurts J Arts C
Full Access

Aim

Prosthetic joint infections pose a major clinical challenge. Developing novel material surface technologies for orthopedic implants that prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation is essential. Antimicrobial coatings applicable to articulating implant surfaces are limited, due to the articulation mechanics inducing wear, coating degradation, and toxic particle release. Noble metals are known for their antimicrobial activity and high mechanical strength and could be a viable coating alternative for orthopaedic implants [1]. In this study, the potential of thin platinum-based metal alloy coatings was developed, characterized, and tested on cytotoxicity and antibacterial properties.

Method

Three platinum-based metal alloy coatings were sputter-coated on medical-grade polished titanium discs. The coatings were characterized using optical topography and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS). Ion release was measured using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Cytotoxicity was tested according to ISO10993-5 using mouse fibroblasts (cell lines L929 and 3T3). Antibacterial surface activity, bacterial adhesion, bacterial proliferation, and biofilm formation were tested with gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and gram-negative Escherichia coli ATCC 25922. Colony forming unit (CFU) counts, live-dead fluorescence staining, and SEM-EDS images were used to assess antibacterial activity.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 4 | Pages 455 - 464
15 Mar 2023
de Joode SGCJ Meijer R Samijo S Heymans MJLF Chen N van Rhijn LW Schotanus MGM

Aims

Multiple secondary surgical procedures of the shoulder, such as soft-tissue releases, tendon transfers, and osteotomies, are described in brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) patients. The long-term functional outcomes of these procedures described in the literature are inconclusive. We aimed to analyze the literature looking for a consensus on treatment options.

Methods

A systematic literature search in healthcare databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, CINAHL, and Web of Science) was performed from January 2000 to July 2020, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane ROBINS-I risk of bias tool. Relevant trials studying BPBP with at least five years of follow-up and describing functional outcome were included.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 19 - 19
1 Apr 2018
Martens S Lipperts M Samijo S Walbeehm R Grimm B
Full Access

Background

Shoulder pain limits range of motion (ROM) and reduces performing activities of daily living (ADL). Objective assessment of shoulder function could be of interest for diagnosing shoulder pathology or functional assessment of the shoulder after therapy.

The feasibility of 2 wearable inertial sensors for functional assessment to differentiate between healthy subjects and patients with unilateral shoulder pathology is investigated using parameters as asymmetry.

Methods

75 subjects were recruited into this study and were measured for at least 8 h a day with the human activity monitor (HAM) sensor. In addition, patients completed the Disability of the Arm, Should and Hand (DASH) score and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score. From 39 patients with a variety of shoulder pathologies 24 (Age: 53.3 ± 10.5;% male: 62.5%) complete datasets were successfully collected. From the 36 age-matched healthy controls 28 (Age: 54.9 ± 5.8;% male = 57.1%) full datasets could be retrieved.

Activity parameters were obtained using a self-developed algorithm (Matlab). Outcome parameters were gyroscope and accelerometry-based relative and absolute asymmetry scores (affected/unaffected; dominant/non-dominant) of movement intensity.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 466 - 466
1 Nov 2011
Koerver R Heyligers I Samijo S Grimm B
Full Access

Introduction: In clinical orthopaedics questionnaire based outcome scores such as the DASH shoulder score suffer from a ceiling effect, subjectivity and the dominance of pain perception over functional capacity. As a result it has becomes increasingly difficult to clinically validate medical innovations in therapy or implants and to account for rising patient demands. Thus, objective functional information needs to be added to routine clinical assessment. Motion analysis with opto-electronic systems, force plates or EMG is a powerful research tool but lab-based, too expensive and time consuming for routine clinical use. Inertia sensor based motion analysis (IMA) can produce objective motion parameters while being faster, cheaper and easier to operate. In this study a simple IMA shoulder test is defined and

its reliability tested,

its diagnostic power to distinguish healthy from pathological shoulders is measured and

it is validated against gold standard clinical scores.

Methods: An inertia sensor (41x63x24mm3, 39g) comprising a triaxial accelerometer (±5g) and a triaxial gyroscope (±300°/sec) was taped onto the humerus in a standardised position. One-hundred healthy subjects without shoulder complaints (40.6 ±15.7yrs) and 40 patients (55.4 ±12.7yrs) with confirmed unilateral shoulder pathology (29 subacromial impingement, 9 rotator cuff pathology, 2 other) were measured. Two motion tasks (‘hand behind the head’ and ‘hand to the back’) based on the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were performed on both shoulders (three repetitions at self selected speed). Motion parameters were calculated as the surface area described by combing two angular rate signals of independent axes (ARS) or by combing the angular rate and the acceleration of a single axis (COMP score). The relative asymmetry between two sides was scored.

Results: The test produced high intra-(r2≥0.88) and inter-observer reliability (r2≥0.82). Healthy subjects scored a mean asymmetry of 9.6% (ARS) and 14.6% (Comp). Patients with shoulder complaints showed > 3× higher asymmetry (ARS: 34.1%, Comp: 42.7%) than the healthy controls (p< 0.01). Using thresholds (ARS: 16%, Comp 27%) healthy and pathological subjects could be distinguished with high diagnostic sensitivity (e.g. ARS: 97.5% [CI: 85.3–99.9%]) and specificity (e.g. COMP: 85.5% [CI: 76.1–91.1%]). Both asymmetry scores were strongly intercorrelated (r2=0.76) as were the clinical scores (r2=0.62, DASH-SST). Asymmetry and clinical scores were hardly correlated (r2< 0.14).

Discussion: The IMA shoulder test and asymmetry scores showed high reliability meeting or exceeding common clinical scores. With a fast assessment of a simple ADL tasks (test duration < 60s) it was possible to provide diagnostic power at clinically usable level making routine clinical application feasible even by nonspecialist personnel. Weak correlations with the clinical scores show that the new test adds an objective functional dimension to outcome assessment which may have the potential to differentiate new treatments or implants required to trigger new therapeutic innovation cycles. Similar motion tests and parameters could also serve lower extremity outcome assessment.