Introduction

The aim of this study was to compare the results and length of stay of patients of early (within 12 hours) versus conventional (after 48 hours) ankle fixation our hospital.

Introduction

The aim of the study was to analyze the outcome of AO cannulated screws for fractures neck of femur at our institute.

The aim of this study was to determine current practice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction amongst BASK members. This was an internet-based survey where members were invited to complete a questionnaire on ACL reconstruction.

Of the 365 BASK surgeons performing ACL reconstruction, 241 completed the questionnaire (response rate 66%). 147(61%) of surgeons used both hamstring and patellar tendon grafts, 71(29%) used only hamstrings and 21(9%) used patellar tendon only. All surgeons used ipsilateral autograft.

157 (65%) used the transtibial technique for femoral tunnel placement with 80(33%) using the anteromedial portal technique. Of those using the anteromedial portal, the most common femoral fixation devices were the Endobutton (34%) and RCI screw (34%). Interference screw fixation (81%) was the most common tibial fixation in the same group of surgeons with the RCI screw being the most common (63%). 19% (45/241) of surgeons were performing double bundle ACL reconstructions in select cases.

Hamstring femoral fixation was with a suspension device in 79% and interference screw in 18%. Of those using a suspension device the Endobutton was most common (48%) followed by Transfix (26%) and Rigidfix (19%). Tibial fixation was most commonly achieved by interference screw (57%) followed by Intrafix (30%).

With patellar tendon graft the most popular femoral fixation was with an interference screw (66%) followed by suspension (34%). All surgeons used interference screw for tibial fixation.

90% of surgeons (217) allow immediate full weight-bearing as tolerated irrespective of fixation type with 8% delaying full weight bearing between 1 and 3 weeks. The results show the wide spread of variation in practice of ACL reconstruction. With recent renewed interest in a more anatomic placement of tunnels, the use of the anteromedial portal may continue to increase. With such a wide variation in techniques, grafts and fixation implants used, a register may help assess outcomes.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of AO cannulated screws for undisplaced fracture neck of femur and find out the correlation in outcome with respect to co-morbidities in a general trauma unit in UK.

Method: A retrospective study was conducted using data from electronic patient record, clinical coding information, clinic letters and GP’s. 315 patients who underwent AO screws for fracture neck of femur during 2000 to 2004 were included. We looked into age, place of living, classification, mechanisn of injury, comorbidities, mobility before fracture, allergy, addictions, whether patient was anticoagulated, delay for theatre with reasons, length of stay in hospital, complications and treatment for complications. We assessed reasons for other admissions later on, need and type of another operation, consequently developed comorbidities, patient getting fracture of other side and its treatment, time and cause of death if happened?

Results: There were 81 males and 234 females in the study. Mean age of patients was 72 years (range 50–96 years). Non-union occurred in 19 patients (6%) and avascular necrosis occurred in 49 patients (15.5%). Reoperation with an arthroplasty was required in 69 patients (21.9 %). The incidence of avascular necrosis with internal fixation at 1 year was 31 (9.8%). Fifty-one (16%) patients died in 2 year period. The age, walking ability of the patient, and associated co-morbidities were of statistical significance in predicting fracture healing complications. We correlated our complications with comorbidities and found them more in patients with end-stage renal failure, steroid intake, osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus etc.

Conclusion: The rate of fracture healing complications and reoperations in patients with undisplaced fractures was high in our series with two year follow up. It was even higher in patients with age greater than 80 years and some specific comorbidities. We should also consider co-morbidities and age before deciding for internal fixation rather than only the fracture configuration (Treat patient not the X-rays). Outcome is multifactorial and depends on many predictive factors. Each patient should be evaluated carefully and we should treat the physiological age and not the chronological age.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the outcome of AO cannulated screws for fractures neck of femur in patients with Diabetes mellitus.

Method: Sixty-two patients aged 50 years or more (17 males & 45 females) who underwent AO screws for fracture neck of femur over seven years (1999–2005) and followed-up for a minimum of two years formed the study population. A retrospective review of data from electronic patient record (EPR), clinical coding, clinic & GP letters was made. Age, residential placement, Garden’s classification of fracture, mode of injury, associated other co morbidities, pre-admission mobilisation status, allergies, addictions and anticoagulation status details were collected.

Results: The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 52–96 yrs). Eleven patients died in two years time. Forty-one patients were less than 75 years of age and 21 patients were more than 75 years of age. All the patients more than 75 years of age had undisplaced intracapsular fractures. Thirteen patients were type I and 49 patients were type II diabetic. Non-union and avascular necrosis occurred in nine (17%) & 13 (26%) patients respectively. Revision surgery in the form of total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty were performed in 21 (41%) cases. The incidence of avascular necrosis following osteosynthesis at one year was 14%. Age, control of diabetes, postoperative complications, pre-fracture mobilization status etc. Complications like wound infection were more principally in patients who had poorly-controlled diabetes.

Conclusion: Patients with diabetes mellitus have metabolic bone disease due to vasculitis. This increases the risk of complications associated with fracture fixation such as non-union, cut-through and avascular necrosis (AVN). The complications and revision surgery rate was high in patients with displaced fractures and with poorly controlled diabetes. Comorbidities like diabetes and patient’s age were also strong predictors of healing in addition to fracture configuration. Looking at very high complication and re-operation rate, our recommendation in patients with diabetes is primary hemiarthroplasty irrespective of femoral head displacement, if there age is more than 75 years.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the results and length of stay of patients of early ankle fracture fixation with conventional fixation in a busy District General Hospital in UK.

Method: A retrospective study was conducted using data from case records, electronic patient record, clinical coding information, clinic letters and Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). Two hundred patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation from July 2004 to June 2005 were included. We looked into age, place of living, Weber classification, mechanism of injury, comorbidities especially diabetes and peripheral vascular disease, addictions mainly smoking, whether patient was anticoagulated, delay for theatre with reasons, length of stay in hospital and complications if any. Other things to looked at were, overlying skin condition, the amount of swelling at the time of presentation to A& E, associated ankle dislocation or talar shift needing reduction, injury types-open or closed or with associated neuro-vascular injury. In-operative management – what method was used ie malleolar screws, diastasis screw, fibular plating, calcaneotalotibial nail or external fixater etc.

Results: In the 12-month retrospective review, there were 200 ankle fractures that required surgical intervention. Only twenty-two of these had surgery within 12 hours (mean length of stay, 3.3 days), and sixty-seven of these had surgery within 48 hours (mean length of stay, 4.9 days), and 111 had surgery after 48 hours (mean length of stay, 9.4 days). Finally we calculated the cost (784 bed days – £235 thousands) incurred to the trust in terms of extra bed occupancy and treating the complications as a result of wait.

Conclusion: This study shows that early operative intervention for ankle fractures reduces the length of hospital stay. Intensive physiotherapy and co-ordinated discharge planning are also essential ingredients for early discharge. We want to emphasise on the ‘Window of Opportunity’ ie initial 12 hours to fix ankle fractures to decrease overall morbidity and cost.

Purpose: Tension band wiring is the most common surgical procedure for fixation of fractures of the Olecranon, but it is associated with high rate of metal work complications and implant failure leading to re-operation.

Method: We present a new fixation technique for olecranon fractures that avoids reoperation to remove hardware as compared with the standard fixation technique with Kirschner wires and tension band wiring as advocated by the AO technique. We describe fixation of displaced transverse and oblique olecranon fractures with anchor sutures, each of which has two pairs of suture strands. Prior to the insertion of the anchor sutures, the fracture is reduced through a standard open approach

Results: Twelve patients have been treated with this technique so far, with a mean follow-up of 6 months. The mean age of the patients was 46.7 years (range 14–75 yrs). We have followed all these patients till union of the fractures. No immediate complications have been noted. Radiographic results are good, with no loss of reduction.

Conclusion: This technique avoids the need for reop-eration for hardware removal without compromising the quality of reduction. It may be argued that anchor sutures may cost more than tension band wiring which is a very low cost procedure. At the same time, we should also consider the future cost involved because of reoperation rate and morbidity. Our newly described technique would be particularly useful in dealing with olecranon fractures in children where it is undesirable to cross the physeal plate by metal work. It would also be of great value in dealing with intra articular distal humeral fractures where fixation is planned initially but conversion to total elbow replacement becomes essential intra-operatively. In such cases an olecranon osteotomy can be fixed by this technique, even in presence of a total elbow replacement.

Purpose: To assess moderate-term outcomes of silastic joint replacements of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

Method: The thirty-two patients (37 feet) that had silastic implants inserted were reviewed at an average of 2 years and 4 months (ranging 7 months to 5 years and 4 months). The mean patient age was 63 years. These patients answered a subjective questionnaire, had their feet examined clinically and radiographically and a pre-operative and post-operative AOFAS score was calculated for each.

Results: The follow-up assessment revealed that every patient described that their pain had decreased after surgery and 17 feet (46%) were completely pain free. There was a significant improvement in patients’ subjective pain scores after surgery (t value = < 0.0001). Pre-operatively, the mean pain score for all 37 feet was 8.14, whereas post-operative the mean pain score was 1.32. The mean AOFAS score before surgery was 39.97. This increased to a mean score of 87.40 after surgery (P = < 0.0001). This again is a significant improvement. No patient was dissatisfied with the outcome with their surgery.

Conclusion: These moderate term results are encouraging, with good subjective and objective results. However, long-term follow-up will be required to assess the longevity of this implant.

Spinal pathologies requiring spinal/neurospinal unit’s input/opinion from tertiary centres for their management are initially admitted to DGHs. The referral is made by mailing radiographs with clinical details to the on-call registrar who gets back with a management plan. This arrangement is fraught with delays at various levels having an impact on patient care, financial and medico-legal implications. We discuss these issues between index DGH (Poole General Hospital) and its tertiary referral centres.

To review the existing management of spinal injury admissions at our hospital, analyse critical/adverse incidents and to identify areas for improving patient care.

A comprehensive retrospective review of all spinal admissions/referrals made to tertiary centres over 6 months was undertaken. Twenty eight of the 64 admissions warranted referrals. A structured proforma was used to document the time of admission, time of booking and performing scans, time of referral & response from tertiary centre and time of transfer from hospital notes and delays at each level were critically analysed.

Seven of the 28 referrals had either neurodeficit or spinal instability. Common issues were delay in obtaining CT/MRI scans (av 2.5 days), delay due to reporting/failing to act on results (av 1.8 days), delays due to missing/lost in transit’ scans (av 1.5 day), delay in obtaining opinion (av 4 days) and non-availability of bed for transfer (av 5.5 days). There was 1 mortality and 5 other complications while awaiting transfer. The financial costs incurred were approximately £73,000 & loss of 246 patient-days.

Training on induction day, implementation of spinal care pathway and diligent documentation/communication coupled with succinct referral were strictly enforced following this study. The website www.neurorefer.co.uk was set up by Wessex neurological centre to streamline referrals and enhance efficiency. This website has now grown into a national secure referral portal incorporating other referral centres.

We aim to create a set of reference data of commonly used scoring systems in the normal population, and to compare these results with published postoperative scores for commonly performed knee operations. This was a questionnaire-based study and a total of 744 questionnaires were sent out, of which 494 replies were received. Six scoring systems were addressed: Lysholm and Oxford Knee Scores, Tegner and UCLA activity scales and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) for both pain and function. Data was collected into groups based on age (20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89 years). The reference data obtained was then compared to published postoperative scores for knee arthroplasty and ACL reconstruction, to assess whether these patients did indeed return to “normal”.

The mean scores for sequential age groups (described above) were as follows: Oxford Knee Score – 13, 13, 14, 14, 17, 15, 17; Lysholm Knee Score – 96, 95, 92, 89, 89, 89, 79; Tegener Activity Scale – 6, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3; UCLA Activity Scale – 8, 7, 7, 7, 6, 6, 5; VAS pain – 5, 8, 10, 9, 14, 12, 20; VAS function 96, 95, 90, 90, 86, 84, 84. Symptom based scoring systems (Oxford Knee Score, Lysholm) were independent of age whereas activity scores (Tegner, UCLA) decreased with age. There was no significant difference detected between scores in different sexes in the same age group. Compared to published scores in an age-matched population following TKR, the data obtained showed that patients do not return to normal scores following arthroplasty. Following ACL reconstructive surgery, activity scores were higher than compared to the data obtained from our population.

Data generated from this study can be used as reference data and can play an important role in interpreting post-intervention scores following knee surgery.

Aim: Volar locking plates are increasingly used in the management of distal radius fractures. As with any new implant, understanding the rate and type of potential metalwork related complications is important. The aim of the study was to determine the type and rate of implant related complications that require further surgery when using volar locking plates in the management of distal radius fractures.

Methods: In this study, we reviewed 114 distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plating. Patient records were reviewed with regards to demographics, operative details and post-operative outcomes. Fractures were classified as intra-articular or extra-articular. They were further classified using the AO classification system

Results: In our series, 12 cases (10%) underwent further surgery for metal work related complications mainly for screw protrusion into the radiocarpal joint following fracture collapse. Intra-articular fractures had a significantly greater complication rate as compared to extra-articular ones (11 vs. 1, P=0.04). There was no significant difference between the three plating systems used in this series with regards to need of further surgery (P=0.43). There was no significant difference between the grade of the operating surgeon with regards to metal work complications (P=0.9). There was no difference in rate of complications between males and females (P=0.27). Similarly there was no difference in metal work complications between patients aged less than 60 as compared to those aged more than 60 years (P=0.58). Our study has shown that volar locking plates may be associated with up to 10% rate of metalwork complications requiring revision surgery. The most common (8 out of 12) cause of re-operation was to remove the screws protruding into the radio-carpal joint.

Discussion: Our results suggest that volar locking plates are associated with a high rate of metal work related complications requiring further surgery. In conclusion our study suggests that volar locking plates are associated with high reoperation rates for implant related complications. Intraoperative screening to ensure that there is no intrarticular penetration is also essential. We favour obtaining intra-operatively a lateral view with the forearm elevated 15–20 degrees to the horizontal plane to allow for the medial-lateral radial inclination and taking the posterior-anterior view at about 20 degrees to the horizontal plane to allow for the normal volar distal radial tilt.

We feel that for a common fracture such as distal radial fractures an ideal implant should be easily reproducible with a low complication rate.

Introduction: To train the surgeon adds to the length of procedures and this is currently not accounted for, in the finance received to perform the operation by the hospital.

Objective: Our study focussed on these main questions:

What is the effect on the length of a procedure when a trainee is involved?

Method: Data was taken from two different sources, firstly, the ORMIS theatre system and patient operation notes. These were used to determine the length of six different types of orthopaedic procedures and the level of the main surgeon. This was collected in Stepping Hill hospital, Stockport, United Kingdom between June and July 2008. The second source used was a consultant’s logbook comprising 227 primary total knee replacements between 2004 and 2008.

Results: The data collected via the ORMIS system produced trends suggesting trainees took longer to perform procedures than consultants. The data from the consultant logbook statistically proved this. List times appeared unaffected by trainee presence. In Orthopaedic surgeries, 92% times trainees were present during the procedure and out of this 17% cases were performed by trainees. For total hip replacements done by trainees the procedure took significantly longer surgical time than consultant performed procedures (p = 0.0337).

Among these cases, 71% were performed by senior trainees. The consultant’s log book data also suggested the similar trends. In all comparisions, time taken by trainees to perform surgeries were statistically significant. Trainee performed with consultant scrubbed versus consultant performed (P = < 0.0001), trainee performed with consultant in theatre versus consultant performed(P = 0.0318) and trainee performed with consultant scrubbed versus trainee performed with consultant in theatre (P = 0.002)

Discussion and Conclusion: Hospitals are paid a fixed fees per operation due to introduction of payment by results system as they are paid a fixed tariff for a particular procedure. Training increases the length of a procedure and therefore in an efficient structured environment prevents as many cases being done on a list. Therefore, training future surgeons costs the hospital money. To counter this, training hospitals should be given financial incentives to train in surgery, or procedures performed by trainees should be priced differently to account for the time lost by training.

Introduction: The Rhys-Davies exsanguinator is a commonly used tool for exsanguinating upper or lower limbs in orthopaedic surgery. The use of same exsanguinators on a repetitive basis can cause cross contamination. This study was aimed at looking at the contamination of the Rhys-Davies exsanguinators in our hospital and comparing the results after cleaning it with a disinfectant wipe.

Materials and Methods: We used two standard methods to measure the contamination levels of the Rhys-Davies exsanguinators. In first method, we used rapid microbial ATP bioluminescence assay to detect contamination before and after cleaning of these exsanguinators. We did this test at four specified sites (outer top, outer bottom, inside top and inside bottom) after clearly marking them. Our second method was taking samples and using standard agar plates from the 24 sites of these 6 Rhys-Davies exsanguinators. We repeated the assay as well the swabs from all the sites, after cleaning these exsanguinators with Sani Cloth 70 Alcohol Wipes. We incubated these samples at 37 deg cel for 48 hours and kept them in enrichment cultures for 7 days.

Results: All sampled Rhys-Davies exsanguinators were heavily contaminated as revealed by both the methods. On bioluminescence assay, in some exsanguinators the count was 100 times more than normal (acceptable value is 30). Similarly all exsanguinators were colonised with bacterial count varying from 8 to > 350. Coagulase negative staphylococcus was the most commonly grown organism from the exsanguinators. After cleaning these tourniquets with Sani Cloth Wipes, there was 95% reduction in bioluminescence assay and 99% reduction in contamination from colony growth point of view, which is statistically significant (P=0.02).

Conclusion: Nine percent of hospital in-patients are believed to acquire an infection after their admission to hospital. Different organisms can raise different levels of concerns. Coagulase negative Staphylococcus from a skin swab is normal but it can be a major source for surgical site infections. The presence of any number of such organisms around a surgical site can be worrying. The presence of a single colony of other pathogenic organisms such as MRSA, Coliforms or Pseudomonas can be alarming if found on these devices. This study suggests that mechanical decontamination by cleaning with sani cloth wipes, then leaving it to dry completely for 15 minutes might reduce the level of contamination of these devices. Use of rapid R-mATP assay has added strength to our study as it requires only 5 min to complete, including sampling. This screening method can be used randomly to check whether protocols are being properly followed, regarding decontamination of such devices.

Introduction: The Polarus nail is used in the treatment of displaced surgical neck of humerus fractures, but has been reported to have a high hardware complication rate. A recent change to 5.3 mm “non-toggling” proximal locking screws has been introduced in an attempt to minimise these complications.

The aims of this study were to determine union rates and hardware complications, and to assess whether the “non-toggle” proximal locking option prevented screw back-out.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of case notes and radiographs of consecutive patients treated with the 150 mm length Polarus nail for acute displaced surgical neck of humerus fractures at our unit between 1st May 2002 and 29th February 2008. All patients were followed up until fracture union.

Results: Forty-nine patients were treated with the Polarus nail during the study period. Eleven patients were lost to follow-up before fracture union, so were excluded. Median age of the patients was 72 years (range: 31 to 94 years). Mean time to surgery was 10.7 days (range: two to 25 days).

Thirty-six fractures (95%) went on to unite following treatment with the Polarus nail. Of the two fractures that failed to unite one had an infective non-union and the other developed avascular necrosis with non-union of the surgical neck.

Twelve patients (32%) developed post-operative hardware complications. In nine (24%) there was backing out of the proximal locking screws, but only two patients had symptoms requiring screw removal. In five patients (13%) the nail was prominent proximally, causing impingement. In one patient (3%) the proximal screws penetrated the gleno-humeral joint, although this was asymptomatic.

There was backing-out in six of the 21 patients (29%) in which the standard 5.0 mm proximal locking screws were used. This compared with three out of 14 patients (21%) in which the 5.3 mm “non-toggling” screws were used. The difference in the rate of screw backing-out between the two groups was significant (P = 0.0474, Fisher’s Exact test). In three patients a mixture of 5.0 and 5.3 mm screws was used.

Discussion: The Polarus nail provides a stable fixation to union when used for the treatment of displaced surgical neck of humerus fractures. It is associated with a high hardware complication rate (32%), however, this is asymptomatic in the majority of cases (60%). The 5.3 mm “non-toggle” proximal locking option was found to reduce the rate of screw back-out compared with the standard 5.0 mm screw. We recommend the use of this “non-toggling” screw option for proximal locking.

Introduction: Hip fractures guidelines suggest that ‘all patients with fracture neck of femur should be operated upon as soon as possible (within 24hrs). Despite this different studies suggest that still 11% of hip fractures are treated conservatively (varies 3–37%).

Aim: Our main aim was to find out whether there is a place for non-operative treatment as a definitive primary option in patients with significant medical comorbidity. We also wanted to audit best practice for conservative treatment in medically compromised patients and in those patients whose hip fractures are not suitable for surgical repair.

Methods: We did this audit in 2007 collating information on 1010 hip fracture patients across 14 NHS hospitals in England. 50 out of 1010 (4.95%) patients were treated conservatively. We reviewed the records of these 50 patients (range 66–99, mean age 78 years) and looked at patient demographics, radiographic features, mobility, accommodation, cognition, and ASA class were recorded.

Results: There were 17 males and 33 females patients managed conservatively in our study. Before injury, 37 (74%) were living at home and 13 (26%) were institutionalised. During hospitalisation, 4 became bedridden and 30 died (mainly due to medical comorbidities). Among these 50 patients, eight were deemed physically unfit for surgery by anaesthetists and two by medical consultants. The decision of conservative treatment was made by orthopaedic consultants in ten cases and by multidisciplinary team in four cases. Five patients refused surgery and five patients were palliative due to terminal illnesses. Patients who did not proceed to surgery (either treated conservatively by choice or presented at admission with complications) had significantly higher mortality rates (overall mortality rate 60 %) suggesting that they were physiologically much worse group of patients.

Discussion: As the average life span of our population increases, some hip fractures are now treated non-operatively because of the possibility of severe or fatal complications due to surgery. Often, refusal of surgery by the patient or the patients’ family obligates the need for non-operative treatment. It is acceptable to postpone the surgery if the patients are medically unfit for these reasons (eg. acute cardiac event, patient dying, severe aortic stenosis, multi-organ failure). It is not considered appropriate if surgery is cancelled due to pyrexia, chest infection, borderline Hb or awaiting ECHO for murmur. Administrative or logistic reasons (eg. no HDU bed) needs to be looked at higher levels as well.

Introduction and Aim: The metacarpal fractures constitute 10% of skeletal fractures in general affecting mainly children and young adults. There is a lot of discrepancy and lack of evidence with regards to correctly managing the little finger metacarpal fractures. Our study was aimed at investigating the current practice of management little finger metacarpal fractures among upper limb surgeons in United Kingdom.

Methods: We conducted an online survey between June 2006 and June 2007 consisting of 10 multiple-choice questions that was e-mailed to 278 upper limb orthopaedic specialist surgeons. The response rate was 58% (n = 158) from the upper limb surgeons. Four questionnaires had to be excluded due to multiple responses to each question or incomplete forms.

Results: 43% upper limb surgeons prefer neighbour strapping alone for non-operative management of little finger metacarpal fractures. Ulnar gutter cast or splint was the next choice among 19% upper limb surgeons while 13% respondents apply neighbour strapping to ring finger along with a splint. There was mixed response regarding period of immobilisation. 40% of surgeons were in favour of 3 weeks of immobilisation, 23% for 2 weeks while 28% do not immobilise these fractures at all.

With regard to considering the most important indication(s) for surgical intervention, rotational deformity was the most common indication (84%), followed by open fracture (70%), intra-articular fracture (44%), associated 4th metacarpal fracture (26%), shortening > 5mm (21%) and volar angulation – (15%). If treated non-operatively, the most preferred period of fracture clinic follow up was one visit at 3 weeks by 40% while 36% thought that no follow up is required once decision is made to treat them conservatively.

Conclusion: Isolated undisplaced fractures of little metacarpal are usually managed conservatively using a plethora of methods of immobilisation. The indications for operative intervention are open fracture, rotational deformity, intra-articular fractures and shortening. Many clinical studies have demonstrated that in the conservative care of boxer’s fractures (casting, with or without reduction), between 20 degrees and 70 degrees of dorsal angulation is acceptable. We conclude that contemporary literature provides no evidence as to whether conservative or operative methods of the treatment of these fractures is superior, but rather suggests that they are equally effective. We conclude from our survey that there is no consensus even among the upper limb surgeons with regards to management of little finger metacarpal fractures in United Kingdom.

Aim: Our aim was to find the effect of implementation of European working time directive on current Orthopaedic training in England. Hip fracture surgery is one of the most frequently performed operation on the trauma lists and hence it is considered mandatory to independently able to perform hip fracture surgery in the registrar training curriculum.

Methods: The audit was performed over four month period in 2007 (1st April to 31st July) collating information on 1010 hip fracture patients undergoing surgery in 14 NHS hospitals in the North Western deanery of England. We have analysed the results of the this and have identified a potential area of concern.

Results: An orthopaedic trainee of registrar level(Speciality trainee year 3–6) was the lead surgeon in 37% of cases while only 4% of operations were performed by a Speciality trainee year 1–2 or Foundation year 2 (senior house officer grade) in 2007. These findings varied amongst the audited hospitals but in one hospital, trainees operated on only 12% of hip fractures. Overall, a trust grade surgeon (non-training grade) was the lead surgeon in 24% of cases. Comparing with the previous audits performed in the same hospitals, the number of hip fracture operations performed by trainees have reduced drastically. In 2003 and 2005 audits, Orthopaedic registrar’s operated on 52 % and 50% of hip fractures respectively. Similarily senior house officers had hands on experience on 11% and 9% of hip fractures in 2003 and 2005 respectively. There is a definite trend suggesting decrease in number of operations by trainees since the implementation of European working time directive as it has been introduced in a phased manner since 2004. In NHS, Current target is to achieve it fully by next year which may make the situation even worse from training point of view.

Discussion: European working time directive has reduced the working hours, leading to decreased hours of surgical training. On the other hand, the modernising medical curriculum (MMC) emphasises demonstration and record keeping of core competencies of surgical skills. The Orthopaedic Competence Assessment Project (OCAP) and the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Project (ISCP) expects trainees to achieve core competencies in key procedures such as hip fracture surgery. In the context of shorter training and reduced working hours, to achieve these core competencies it is imperative to maximise operative exposure and experience for trainees. If the findings of this reaudit in England are mirrored elsewhere in Europe, the implications for orthopaedic training are significant. We are setting very high standards for training on one side but on practical grounds, not able to achieve the requirements set by educational bodies like OCAP and ISCP.

Purpose of the study: What is the effect on the length of a procedure and the number of procedures performed on the list when a trainee is involved? What percentage of cases had trainee involvement for orthopaedic surgery?

Methods: Data was taken from two different sources, firstly, the ORMIS theatre system and patient operation notes. These were used to determine the length of six different types of orthopaedic procedures and the level of the main surgeon. The second source used was a consultant’s logbook comprising 227 primary total knee replacements between 2004 and 2008.

Results: The data collected via the ORMIS system produced trends suggesting trainees took longer to perform procedures than consultants. The data from the consultant logbook statistically proved this. List times appeared unaffected by trainee presence. In Orthopaedic surgeries, 92% times trainees were present during the procedure and out of this 17% cases were performed by trainees. For total knee replacements done by trainees the procedure took significantly longer surgical time than consultant performed procedures (p = 0.0337).

Among these cases, 71% were performed by senior trainees. The consultant’s log book data also suggested the similar trends. Statistically, trainee performed with consultant scrubbed versus consultant performed (P = < 0.0001), trainee performed with consultant in theatre versus consultant performed(P = 0.0318) and trainee performed with consultant scrubbed versus trainee performed with consultant in theatre (P = 0.002)

Discussion & Conclusion: To train the surgeon adds to the length of procedures and this is currently not accounted for, in the finance received to perform the operation by the hospital.

To counter this, training hospitals should be given financial incentives to train in surgery, or procedures performed by trainees should be priced differently to account for the time lost by training.

Purpose: Our aim of this study was to find out the abstract to publication ratio (APR) in peer-reviewed indexed journals of abstracts presented at BASK annual meetings. We also wanted to identify the publishing journals and to look at the amount of time taken for publication.

Methods: We obtained permission from BASK executive committee and retrieved all presentations (podium & poster) over six year period (2000–2005). An extensive PubMed database search was performed to determine whether or not the abstract had been published as a full paper up to the beginning of Nov 2008.

Results: A total of 294 abstracts identified, 114 of them were published as 101 full-text articles in 21 different journals. ‘The Knee’ Journal was the most popular destination with 47 publications (41.2%) followed by JBJS (British) with 28 publications (24.5%). The overall abstract to publication ratio (APR) at BASK annual meetings was 38.77%. The mean duration between presentations to publication was 3.96 yrs (range 0 to 7.2 yrs, median 3.4 yrs).

Conclusion: On bench marking the APR ratio at BASK presentations, it is comparable with those of BOA (33.1%), other BOA affiliated societies (26–50%) and medical specialties (32–66%). Abstract to publication ratio (APR) is considered as a measure of the quality of scientific meetings and our results indicates the higher credentials of BASK meetings. It is very difficult to exactly determine the reason for abstracts failing to indexed publications; it is arguable that some of these projects did not meet the scientific scrutiny of the peer-review process required for full publication. We recommend authors to submit the full manuscript of paper after acceptance of their abstracts for the BASK meeting as done in AAOS meeting in order to encourage them to complete their manuscript before presentation.

Purpose of the study: Our aim was to look at, how we are following the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines regarding the clinic times. The decrease in doctor working hours and increase in sub-specialisation has added to the problem.

Methods: 55 Orthopaedic clinics were observed and time mapped to the nearest second by an independent observer. 5 clinics observed for each of 11 clinicians (5 Consultants and 6 Registrars). The patient factors viz age, sex, mobility, BMI, site of disease were recorded. The clinician factors viz. seniority, sub-specialisation were also recorded.

Results: Of total Clinic time, 45% spent for consulting follow-up cases, 26% for new cases and 29% lost in in-between patient transit time. Of the total clinic time, patient time was 75%, procedures 4%, investigations 3%, consent 4%, dictation 13%, teaching 1%. Mean time for consultation was 13 minutes 6 seconds for new and 8 minutes 43 seconds for follow up patients which was significantly less than that recommended by BOA guidelines (15 – 20 minutes for new and 10 –15 minutes for follow up patients).

Conclusion: Since the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines in 1990, there has been a change in patient’s expectation, responsibility of the clinician towards well informed patients, detailed investigation, consenting in clinics etc. Despite the clinics over running in time the BOA guidelines are not being adhered to potentially compromising quality consultation and training at the cost of pressures to see the recommended 22 unit patients per clinic. There is a need to revise BOA guidelines regarding clinics to provide more time in clinics per patient to maintain quality of care and training.