We report the functional outcome and survivorship of the Hintegra Total Ankle Replacement (TAR), in consecutive cases by multiple surgeons in a single UK institution. Between 2010–2014 the Hintegra TAR held 7.1% UK market share and surgeons should be aware of failure mechanisms. We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 70 consecutive Hintegra TAR cases in a single institution between 2010–2014. Data collected included patient demographics, complications, reoperations, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS: AOS, MOX-FQ, pain VAS) and patient satisfaction.Introduction
Methods
The interaction between surgical lighting and laminar airflow
is poorly understood. We undertook an experiment to identify any
effect contemporary surgical lights have on laminar flow and recommend
practical strategies to limit any negative effects. Neutrally buoyant bubbles were introduced into the surgical field
of a simulated setup for a routine total knee arthroplasty in a
laminar flow theatre. Patterns of airflow were observed and the
number of bubbles remaining above the surgical field over time identified.
Five different lighting configurations were assessed. Data were analysed
using simple linear regression after logarithmic transformation.Aims
Materials and Methods
Comparison of clinical, radiological & functional outcomes of corrective surgery for right thoracic AIS curves. There is a paucity of data relating functional outcomes to the radiological and surface measurement results of either posterior or anterior surgery for right thoracic AIS. Prospective, cohort study, mean follow up 35 months (range 9-115) 38 patients (6 males); 22 Lenke 2 posterior, 16 Lenke 1 anterior. Primary= rib hump, radiological (frontal Cobb correction, apical vertebral translation AVT, sagittal profile), Modified SRS Outcomes Instrument (MSRSI). Secondary= estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, complications No significant difference at P<0.005 with student t-test unless indicated Rib Hump: 16° posterior 17 ° anterior, corrected to 8 ° (50%) and 6 ° (60%) respectively. Thoracic Cobb: 70° posterior 61 ° anterior, corrected to 27° (61%) and 22° (64%) respectively. No difference in preoperative curve flexibility or fulcrum bending correction index. Thoracic AVT 55% correction posterior, 70% anterior, Lumbar Cobb 59% correction posterior, 52% anterior. Thoracic kyphosis significantly reduced in posterior surgery (35 ° to 20 °) and significantly increased with anterior surgery (21° to 30°). Lumbar lordosis significantly reduced with posterior surgery (88° to 47°), no significant change with anterior surgery (60° to 53°). MSRSI; Domain scores similar preoperatively between groups. Difference scores (postop-preop), higher scores=better. Pain: +1.21 posterior +0.73 anterior. Self image: +1.02 posterior +0.71 anterior. Function/activity: +0.28 posterior +0.21 anterior. Mental health: +0.66 posterior +0.45 anterior. No significant difference in complication rate, operative time or estimated blood loss Similar cohorts of AIS patients treated by either anterior or posterior surgery have no significant differences in radiological or functional outcomes. The different final sagittal profile in both groups did not affect the MSRSI outcomes. Both procedures deliver significant health gains as measured by the MSRSI.
To determine the factors that influences the clinical outcomes in surgical correction of thoracic AIS. There are conflicting data regarding the effects of back shape and radiologic parameters on the self-reported outcomes of surgery in AIS. Prospective, cohort study; mean follow-up 29 months (range 9-88) 30 patients (5 males); Rib hump 17 ° corrected to 7 °. Thoracic Cobb 66 ° corrected to 25 ° (63%). Lumbar Cobb 42 ° corrected to 17°. Thoracic apical vertebral translation (AVT) 48mm corrected to 18mm. Lumbar AVT 34mm corrected to 19mm. Thoracic kyphosis 29° preoperatively 23° postoperatively. Lumbo-sacral lordosis 57° preoperatively 49° postoperatively Modified SRS Outcomes Instrument (MSRSI) filled out pre-operatively and at final follow up. Primary= rib hump, radiological (frontal Cobb correction, lumbar & thoracic AVT, sagittal profile), Modified SRS Outcomes Instrument (MSRSI) domain scores. The magnitude of the rib hump had a significant association with pain: Rib hump vs. MSRSI pain r= -0.55 p<0.000 Similar correlations existed between rib hump and self-image (r=-0.64, p<0.0000), thoracic Cobb angle with pain (r=-0.48 p<0.0001) and self-image (r= -0.57, P<0.0000). The postoperative thoracic Cobb angle, and percentage thoracic Cobb correction had significant correlations with self-image (r=-0.55 p=0.003 & r=0.54 p0.004 respectively). The size of the rib hump has a significant impact on pain & self-image. These domains are also significantly influenced by the residual thoracic Cobb angle and overall scoliosis correction.
