The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in aseptic revision surgery of the joint with a prior septic revision procedure in the same joint remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC in aseptic revisions performed in patients with a previous septic revision in the same joint. As secondary outcome measure, we explore possible risk factors associated with UPC and the re-revision rates. This retrospective single-center study includes all patients between January 2016 and October 2018 with an aseptic revision total hip or knee arthroplasty procedure with a prior septic revision in the same joint. Patients with less than three microbiology samples, without joint aspiration or with aseptic revision surgery performed <3 weeks after a septic revision were excluded. UPC was defined as a single positive culture in a revision that the surgeon had classified as aseptic according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting.Aim
Method
Our goal is to assess diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid testing in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). In addition to differential leukocyte count, simples and inexpensive biomarkers such as synovial fluid C-reactive protein (CRP), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and alpha-2-macrogloblulin(A2M) were also investigated and its possible role in increasing accuracy assessed. Between January/2013 and December/2019 total hip or knee arthroplasty revision cases (regardless of preoperative diagnosis) were prospectively included provided enough synovial fluid for biomarker analysis was collected and at least four tissue samples, as well as the implant for sonication, were gathered for microbiological study. Definitive diagnosis was classified according to the new EBJIS PJI definition. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we determined cutoff values as well as diagnostic accuracy for each marker.Aim
Method
There have been many attempts to define the criteria by which prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is diagnosed. Our aim is to validate the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of PJI. This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who have undergone total hip or knee revision surgery in four different European institutions between 2013–2018. Cases with less than four intraoperative microbiology samples; no preoperative/intraoperative synovial fluid differential leukocyte count or intraoperative histology were excluded. Minimum follow-up of at least two years after revision surgery if no subsequent infection and/or the need for implant removal was also required. All cases were classified using the 2021 EBJIS, the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) and the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) PJI definitions.Aim
Method
Accurate diagnosis is key in correctly managing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our aim is to compare the preoperative performance of three PJI definitions comparing it to definitive postoperative classification. This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who have undergone total hip or knee revision surgery in four different European institutions. For this specific study, cases with no preoperative synovial fluid differential leukocyte count and less than four intraoperative microbiology samples were excluded. Cases were classified using the 2021 EBJIS, the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) and the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) PJI definitions. Preoperative classification was based on clinical features, inflammatory markers and synovial fluid leukocyte count and microbiology results.Aim
Method
Synovial fluid investigation is the best alternative to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI) before adequate microbiological/histology sampling during revision surgery. Although accurate preoperative diagnosis is certainly recommended, puncturing every patient before revision arthroplasty raises concerns about safety and feasibility issues especially in difficult to access joint (e.g., hip), that often require OR time and fluoroscopy/ultrasound guidance. Currently there is no clear guidelines regarding optimal indications to perform preoperative joint aspiration to diagnose PJI before revision surgery. The main goal of this study is to determine the accuracy of our institutional criteria using the new European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) PJI definition. We retrospectively evaluated every single- or first-stage for presumed aseptic or known infected revision total hip/knee arthroplasty procedures between 2013–2020. Preoperative clinical and laboratory features were systematically scrutinized. Cases with insufficient information for accurate final PJI diagnosis (i.e., no perioperative synovial fluid examination or no multiple cultures including sonication of removed implant) were excluded. Preoperative joint aspiration is recommended in our institution if any of the following criteria are met: 1) elevated CRP and/or ESR; 2) early failure (<2 years) or repeat failure; 3) high clinical suspicion/risk factors are present. Performance of such criteria were compared against final postoperative EBJIS definition PJI diagnosis.Aim
Method
Treatment of complicated wound healing after total joint arthroplasty is controversial. What exactly constitutes prolonged wound drainage is matter of debate and recommendations to manage it vary considerably. Nonoperative measures are often recommended. If drainage persists, surgery may be indicated. To further intricate decision-making, differentiating superficial from deep surgical site infection is also controversial and inherently complex. Specific cutoffs for synovial fluid leukocyte count and blood C-reactive protein (CRP) in the acute stage have been suggested as a way to superficial infection requiring superficial wound washout from deep infection requiring a formal debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure. The goal of this study is to analyze clinical and laboratory findings of an institutional protocol of “aggressively” proceeding with formal DAIR in all patients with complicated wound healing Our indications for DAIR in suspected acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are: 1)prolonged wound drainage and CRP upward trend after day-3; 2)persistent wound drainage by day-10 regardless of CRP; 3)wound healing disturbance (e.g. “superficial” infection, “superficial” skin necrosis) anytime in early postoperative weeks. We retrospectively evaluated patients undergoing DAIR in the first 60 postoperative days between 2014–2018. Patients without multiple deep tissue cultures obtained intraoperative were excluded. Deep infection was defined by at least two positive deep tissue cultures or one positive deep culture and positive leukocyte count (>10,000 cells/mL or >90% PMN).Aim
Method
C-reactive protein(CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) are non-specific markers with variable reported accuracy in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection(PJI). They are often used as a part of the initial diagnostics as they are widely available and inexpensive. Given its high false-negative rate, CRP is an insufficient screening tool for PJI especially in low virulence microorganisms. Nevertheless, many advocate ESR offers no added advantage and is useless in this setting. Our goal is to determine if the combined measurement of ESR and CRP offers increased sensitivity for the preliminary screening of PJI over isolated CRP measurement. We retrospectively evaluated every single- or first-stage for presumed aseptic or known infected revision total hip/knee arthroplasty procedures between 2013–2018. Cases without preoperative CRP and ESR measurement as well those without synovial fluid for differential leukocyte count and/or no multiple cultures including sonication of removed implant obtained during surgery were excluded. Diagnostic accuracy was compared against two different PJI definitions: 2013 International Consensus Meeting and ProImplant Foundation definitions.Aim
Method
Antibiotic loaded spacers are often used during a two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) both for its mechanical properties and as a means for local antibiotic delivery. The main goal of this study is to compare the rate of positive cultures during reimplantation with the use of different antibiotic loaded spacers: aminoglycoside only vs. combined glycopeptide/aminoglycoside vs. combined glycopeptide/carbapenem/aminoglycoside. We retrospectively evaluated every two-stage exchange procedures for infected hip/knee arthroplasty between 2012–2018. Microbiological findings in the first and second stage were registered as well as the type of spacer and antibiotic(s) used. Cases in whom no cultures were obtained during reimplantation and cases without sufficient data on antibiotic(s) used in cement spacers were excluded.Aim
Method
