header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:

Displaced acetabular fractures in the older patient present significant treatment challenges. There is evidence the morbidity and mortality associated is similar to the fractured neck of femur cohort. Despite growing literature, there remains significant controversy regarding treatment algorithms; varying between conservative management, to fracture fixation and finally surgical fixation and simultaneous THA to allow immediate full weight bearing.

£250k NIHR, Research for Patient Benefit (Ref: PB-PG-0815-20054). Trial ethical approval (17/EE/0271). After national consultation, 3 arms included; conservative management, fracture fixation and simultaneous fracture fixation with THA. Statistical analysis required minimum 12 patients/3 arms to show feasibility, with an optimum 20/arm. Inclusion criteria; patients >60 years & displaced acetabular fracture. Exclusion criteria: open fracture, THA in situ, pre-injury immobility, polytrauma. Primary outcome measure - ability recruit & EQ-5D-5L at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures (9 months); OHS, Disability Rating Index, radiographs, perioperative physiological variables including surgery duration, blood loss, complications and health economics.

11 UK level 1 major trauma centres enrolled into the trial, commenced December 2017. Failure surgical equipoise was identified as an issue regarding recruitment. Full trial recruitment (60 patients) achieved; 333 patients screened. 66% male, median age 76 (range 63–93), median BMI 25 (range 18–37), 87% full mental capacity, 77% admitted from own home. 75% fall from standing height. 60% fractures; anterior column posterior hemi-transverse. Trial feasibility confirmed December 2020. Presented data- secondary outcomes that are statistically significant in improvement from baseline for only the fix and replace arm, with acceptable trial complications. Issues are highlighted with conservative management in this patient cohort.

Our unique RCT informs design and sample size calculation for a future RCT. It represents the first opportunity to understand the intricacies of these treatment modalities. This RCT provides clinicians with information on how best to provide management for this medically complex patient cohort.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 86 - 86
1 Jan 2013
Barksfield R Rawal J Angardi D Bowden B Chojnowski A
Full Access

Background

Evidence concerning the management of dorsal fracture dislocation (DFD) of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) in the hand has been limited by small sample size and case heterogeneity within studies. This retrospective case control study examined clinical outcome of this specific subgroup managed by three different methods.

Methods

Patients undergoing fixation of unstable DFD of the PIPJ between March 2005 and August 2011 were identified from theatre records. A retrospective review of case-notes and radiographs was undertaken to determine fracture characteristics, fixation methods and clinical outcomes.


Introduction

Despite the multiple patho-aetiological basis of Hallux valgus (HV), corrective osteotomy is a common and globally performed orthopaedic procedure. Over-correction of the inter-metatarsal angle (IMA), however, is not without consequence. Through increased joint pressures, over-correction may predispose to joint degeneration. Hypothesizing that over-correction leads to an increase in intra-articular joint pressures, we constructed a mechanical simulation of the 1st metatarsal-phalangeal joint.

Methods

The vector forces of Flexor Hallucis Longus, Extensor Hallucis Longus, Extensor Hallucis Brevis and Adductor Hallucis, acting upon the 1st proximal phalanx were simulated with tensioned weighted rope. A Foley catheter balloon inflated to 1.5ml, simulated intra-articular distractive vector forces. The joint was freely mobile.

At 5° IMA intervals from 10° valgus to 15° varus, intrarticular pressures were recorded using a contact pressure (Graseby™, Hertfordshire, UK) transducer attached to a calibrated manometer (Digitech Instruments™, Ulhasnagar, India). At each angle, measurements were repeated five times with removal and recalibration of the pressure monitor after each measurement.