Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a common cause of preventable deafness in adults and exposure to loud noise at work is a significant risk factor for its development. In order to protect the hearing of workers in the U.K., the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions, established the Control of Noise at Work Regulations (2005). The objectives of this study were to define the levels of noise exposure for the surgeon, assistant, scrub nurse and anaesthetist during total hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. In addition, we sought to determine whether the noise exposure during these procedures reaches or exceeds the action values set out by the U.K. Noise at Work Regulations (2005). To our knowledge no real-time assessment of personal noise exposure has been performed simultaneously on multiple members of the theatre team during arthroplasty surgery. Individual noise exposure during arthroplasty hip and knee surgery was recorded using a personal noise dosemeter system model 22 (DM22) (Pulsar instruments, Filey, U.K.). Recordings were taken real-time during five separate theatre sessions. Each theatre session included two arthroplasty procedures and lasted approximately 4hrs. Personal noise exposure was expressed in terms of peak sound pressure and an average noise exposure over an 8-hour time-period to reflect the noise experienced by the ear over a working day. In all three sessions involving total hip replacement surgery the peak sound pressure, for the operating surgeon, exceeded the exposure action values set out by the U.K. Noise at Work Regulations. Theatre sessions involving total knee replacement surgery did not exceed any exposure action values. The peak sound pressures experienced during total hip replacement surgery are too high and mandate that the surgeon should be provided with appropriate hearing protection. In addition, if the upper exposure action value is routinely exceeded then the theatre should be designated a hearing protection zone.
Orthopaedic surgeons are exposed to high levels of noise when performing common surgical procedures. Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) has been demonstrated amongst senior orthopaedic staff. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of hearing loss amongst arthroplasty surgeons compared to non-surgical clinicians and explore the factors associated with hearing loss. A cross-sectional prevalence study. Arthroplasty surgeons and non-surgical clinicians were recruited from orthopaedic and medical conferences. All participants were given a paper questionnaire including demographic details, hearing history and Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS). All participants were screened for hearing loss in a quiet room using the HearCheck Screener™ (Siemens, UK). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with hearing loss. All statistical models were adjusted for age, gender, smoking status and personal noise exposure. A power calculation estimated a sample size of 100 participants.Background
Methods
The rate of total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery continues to dramatically rise in the United States, with over 300,000 procedures performed in 2010. Although a relatively safe procedure, THA is not without complications. These complications include acetabular fracture, heterotopic ossification, implant failure, and nerve palsy to name a few. The rates of neurologic injury for a primary THA are reported as 0.7–3.5%. These rates increase to 7.6% for revision THA. The direct anterior total hip arthroplasty (DATHA) is gaining popularity amongst orthopedic surgeons. Many of these surgeons elect to use the Hana® table during this procedure for optimal positioning capability. Although intraoperative mobility and positioning of the hip joint during DATHA improves operative access, select positions of the limb put certain neurologic structures at risk. The most commonly reported neurologic injuries in this regard are to the sciatic and femoral nerves. To our knowledge, the use of neuromonitoring during DATHA, especially those using the Hana® table, has not been described in the literature. The patient was a 60-year-old male with long standing osteoarthritis of the right hip and prior left THA. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) leads were placed bilaterally into the hand (ulnar nerve) as well as the popliteal fossae (posterior tibial nerve). Unilateral electromyography leads were placed into the vastus medialis obliquus, biceps femoris, gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and abductor hallucis of the operative limb (Fig. 1). Once the patient was sterilely draped, a direct anterior Smith-Peterson approach to the hip was used.Introduction
Methods
Since 2011, the knee service at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre has been offering a neutralising medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to a group of patients presenting with early medial osteoarthritis of the knee, varus alignment and symptoms for more than 2 years. During development of this practice an association was observed between this phenotype of osteoarthritis and the presence of CAM deformity at the hip. A retrospective cohort study. All patients who underwent HTO since 2011 were identified (n=30). Comparator groups were used in order to establish whether meaningful observations were being made: Control group: The spouses of a high-risk osteoarthritis cohort recruited for a different study at our unit (n=20) Pre-arthroplasty group: Patients who have undergone uni-compartmental arthroplasty (UKA) for antero-medial osteoarthritis (n=20)All patients had standing bilateral full-length radiographs available for analysis using in house developed Matlab-based software for hip measurements and MediCAD for lower limb alignment measurements.Background
Methods
