Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral component represents a widely practiced technique for a variety of indications. In this study we compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two polished tapered stems.

From our prospectively collated database we identified all patients undergoing cement-in-cement revision from January 2005 – 2013 who had a minimum of two years follow-up. All cases were performed by the senior author using either an Exeter short revision stem or the C-stem AMT high offset No 1. Patients were followed-up annually with clinical and radiological assessment.

Ninety-seven patients matched the inclusion criteria. There were 50 Exeter and 47 C-stem AMT components. There were no significant differences between the patient demographics in either group. Mean follow-up was 9.7 years. A significant improvement in OHS, WOMAC and SF-12 scores was observed in both cohorts. Leg lengths were significantly shorter in the Exeter group, with a mean of -4mm in this cohort compared to 0mm in the C-stem AMT group. One patient in the Exeter group had early evidence of radiological loosening. In total, 16 patients (15%) underwent further revision of the femoral component (seven in the C-stem AMT group and nine in the Exeter group). No femoral components were revised for aseptic loosening. There were two cases of femoral component fracture in the Exeter group.

Our series shows promising long-term outcomes for the cement-in-cement revision technique using either the Exeter or C-stem AMT components. These results demonstrate that cement-in-cement revision using a double or triple taper-slip design is a safe and reliable technique when used for the correct indications.

The aim of this study is to determine whether fixation, as opposed to revision arthroplasty, can be safely used to treat reducible Vancouver B type fractures in association with a cemented collarless polished tapered femoral stem (the Exeter).

This is a retrospective cohort study of 152 operatively managed consecutive unilateral Vancouver B fractures involving Exeter stems. 130 were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 22 with revision arthroplasty. Radiographs were assessed and classified by 3 observers. The primary outcome measure was revision of ≥1 component. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for revision following ORIF. Secondary outcomes included any reoperation, complications, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay and mortality.

Fractures (B1 n=74 (49%); B2 n=50 (33%); and B3 n=28 (18%)) occurred at mean 6.7±10.4 years after primary THA (n=143) or hemiarthroplasty (n=15). Mean follow up was 6.5 ±2.6 years (3.2 to 12.1). Rates of revision and reoperation were significantly higher following revision arthroplasty compared to ORIF for B2 (p=0.001) fractures and B3 fractures (p=0.05). Five-year survival was significantly better following ORIF: 92% (86.4 to 97.4 95%CI) Vs 63% (41.7 to 83.3), p<0.001. No independent predictors of revision following ORIF were identified: fixation of B2 or B3 fractures was not associated with an increased risk of revision. Dislocation was the commonest mode of failure after revision arthroplasty. ORIF was associated with reduced blood transfusion requirement and reoperations, but there were no differences in medical complications, hospital stay or mortality between surgical groups.

When the bone-cement interface was intact and the fracture was anatomically reducible, Vancouver B2 fractures around Exeter stems can be treated with fixation as opposed to revision arthroplasty. Fixation of Vancouver B3 fractures can be performed in frail elderly patients without increasing revision risk.

Periprosthetic fractures (PPF) of the femur following total hip arthroplasty represent a significant complication with a rising incidence. The commonest subtype is Vancouver B2 type, for which revision to a long uncemented tapered fluted stem is a widely accepted management. In this study we compare this procedure to the less commonly performed cement-in-cement revision.

All patients undergoing surgical intervention for a Vancouver B2 femoral PPF in a cemented stem from 2008 – 2018 were identified. We collated patient age, gender, ASA score, BMI, operative time, blood transfusion requirement, change in haemoglobin (Hb) level, length of hospital stay and last Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Radiographic analysis was performed to assess time to fracture union and leg length discrepancy. Complications and survivorship of implant and patients were recorded.

43 uncemented and 29 cement-in-cement revisions were identified. There was no difference in patient demographics between groups. A significantly shorter operative time was found in the cement-in-cement group, but there was no difference in transfusion requirement, Hb change, or length of hospital stay. OHS was comparable between groups. A non-significant increase in overall complication rates was found in the revision uncemented group, with a significantly higher dislocation rate. Time of union was comparable and there were no non-unions in the cement-in-cement group. A greater degree of stem subsidence was found in the uncemented group. There was no difference in any revision surgery required in either group. Three patients in the uncemented group died in the perioperative period, compared to none in the cement-in-cement group.

With appropriate patient selection, both cement-in-cement and long uncemented tapered stem revision represent appropriate treatment options for Vancouver B2 fractures.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine whether fixation, as opposed to revision arthroplasty, can be safely used to treat reducible Vancouver B type fractures in association with a cemented collarless polished tapered femoral stem (the Exeter).